JD, Bradbury RB & Siriwardena GM 1999: The second silent spring? Nature 400: 611–612. DOI: 10.1038/23127
McGarigal K & Marks B 1995: FRAGSTATS: Spatial analysis program for quantifying landscapestructure. Retrieved November 6, 2017, from https://andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/sites/default/files/lter/pubs/pdf/pub1538.pdf
McGarigal K, Cushman SA & Ene E 2012: FRAGSTATS v4. Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical and Continuous Maps. University of Massachusetts. Amherst. Retrieved September 14, 2017, from http
LandscapeStructures in Context of Contemporary Reality (in Slovak). Životné prostredie, 38, 86-89.
Jakubec, B. (2011). IInfluence of Land Use with Dispersed Settlements on Landscape´s Diversity and Biodiversity. PhD thesis, Technicka univerzita, Zvolen.
Jančura, P., Bohalova, I., Slamova, M. & Mišikova P. (2010). Method of identification and assessment of characteristic landscape appearance. In Bulletin of the Ministry of Environment of Slovak Republic, Part 1b, 18, 2-51. Bratislava: MŽP SR.
Kunz, M. (2010). Diversity of
maps and aerial photographs. Landscape Ecology , 16, 41-54.
Fujihara, M. (2001). Changes in pine forests and their adjacent communities in the Boso Peninsula, central Japan. Hikobia 13: 373-378.
Fujihara, M., Hara, K. & Short, K. (2005). Changes in landscapestructure of "Yatsu" valleys: a typical Japanese urban fringe landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning , Vol 70/3-4: 261-270.
Fujihara, M., Kikuchi, T. (2005). Changes in the landscapestructure of the Nagara River Basin, central
, Budapest (in Hungarian with English Summary)
Bond, G., Burnside, N., G., Metcalfe, D. J., Scott, D. M. & Blamire, J. 2004. The effects of land-use and landscapestructure on Barn Owl (Tyto alba) breeding success in southern England, U.K. – Landscape Ecology 20: 555–566. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-004-5037-7
Cooke, D., Nagle, A., Smiddy, P., Fairley, J. & Muircheartaigh, I. 1996. The diet of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) in County Cork in relation to land use. – Biology & Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 96B(2): 97–111.
de la Peña, N. M, Butet
BURKHARD, B., KROLL, F., MÜLLER, F., WINDHORST, W. (2009): Landscapes' capacities to provide ecosystem services - a concept for land-cover based assessment. Landscape Online, Vol. 15, p. 1-22.
CUSHMAN, S. A., MCGARIGAL, K., NEEL, M. C. (2008): Parsimony in landscape metrics: strength, universality and consistency. Ecological Indicators, Vol. 8, p. 691-703.
DAUBER, J. et al. (2003): Landscapestructure as an indicator of biodiversity: matrix effects on species richness. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 98, p. 321
The growing development of settlements in mountainous areas and their sustainable development constantly requires new approaches to assess the land in terms of occurrence of landslides. The flysch zone, where the monitored area is located, is one of the most landslide prone areas in Slovakia. Landslides respond sensitively to the quality of the individual factors that form the landscape and to the change of natural conditions. Their occurrence is a geo-barrier that reduces or totally prevents the use of natural environment and negatively affects the life of population and territorial development. The reason for the increased hazard of landslides is not only demographic pressure on territories, but also its poor management. Consistent spatial planning addresses not only the spatial layout but also the functional use of the territory. Landslides represent one of the limits of land use. This study is based on the assessment of landsliding as a limit to possible territorial development. The input parameters for the assessment were elements of the current landscape structure (built up structure, forest stands, transitional woodland-shrubs, traditional agricultural land, permanent grasslands and arable land) and occurring landslides (active, potential and stabilized). On most of the determined elements of the landscape, landslides occur on about a quarter of their area. They have a smaller share only in areas of mixed forests, built up areas and have the smallest share on arable land. Potential landslides have the largest proportion on all landscape elements. They occupy the largest areas on coniferous forests (1578.93 ha) and on permanent grasslands (741.33 ha). By evaluating the overall endangerment of the area by landslides according to the degree of threat, we found that the greatest threat of landslides is in the Skalité and Svrčinovec cadastral areas, the smallest threat is in the Čadca cadastral area. In addition to the danger of landsliding in the individual elements of the landscape, we have also set limits for its development. Spatial planning limits have been divided into two categories according to the sectors they affect the most: limiting the development of an area assigned for residential building, or restricting the development of an area designed for agricultural and forestry purposes.
Oļgerts Nikodemus, Simon Bell, Zanda Penēze and Imants Krūze
Latvian Environment Data Centre (2000). Biodiversity in Latvia http://enrin.grida.no/biodiv/biodiv/national/latvia/ecosys/agro/agrpres.htm
Mander, Ü. & Palang, H. (1994). Changes of landscapestructure in Estonia during the soviet period. GeoJournal 33(1): 44-54.
Mazzoleni, D., Di Pasquale, G., Mulligan, M., Di Martino P. & Regio F. (2004). Recent Dynamics of the Mediterranean Vegetation and Landscape. London: J. Wiley and Sons
Changes in the landscapestructure are recognized as having a significant environmental impact on a global scale ( Foley et al. 2005 , Rockström et al. 2009 ). The historical sources, in particular historical map sources, are of growing importance in the fields of environmental history ( Woitschová 2017 ) and land use reconstruction ( Yang et al. 2014 , Fuchs et al. 2015 ). They enable scholars to research and extrapolate the data necessary for the evaluation of the past states of the environment that are closely connected with land use change
evaluating multiscale landscapestructures’, International
Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 34,
part 4/W5, pp. 22–29.
eCognition Developer 8.64.0 User Guide, 2010, Trimble
Documentation, München, Germany.
Griffiths, GH, Lee, J & Eversham, BC 2000, ‘Landscape pattern
and species richness; regional scale analysis from remote
sensing’, International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 21,
Gulinck, H, Múgica, M, de Lucio, JV & Atauri, JA 2001,
cultural landscape archetypes (in Czech) . Praha, CZ: Academia.
Holl, A. & Nilsson K. (1999). Cultural landscape as subject to national research programmes in Denmark. Landsc. Urban Plann. , 46(1-3), 15-27. DOI:10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00035-3.
Hreško, J., Kanasova, D. & Petrovič F. (2010). Landscape archetypes as the elements of Slovak historical landscapestructure. Ekológia (Bratislava) , 29(2), 158-173. DOI: 10.4149/ekol_2010_02_158.
Jakab, I. & Petluš P. (2012). Development of a program tool for the determination of the