which would cover a catchment area of approximately 100,000 persons. It included specific provisions to address the criticisms of the earlier efforts, including lack of financing and administrative plans. The following year, this plan was updated as Strategy for Reform of Mental Health Care in 2013.
Most important, it was announced that the initial implementation of the plans would be funded by the European Union's Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF), which included two major components. The Integrated Regional Operational Programme (IROP) would focus on
there are clear links between research and policy. Work by public administration, public policy and political science scholars over the past decades seems to have informed the policy documents, although the influence is not always direct (i.e., academic publications read by the author of the report), but filtered down through layers within and between countries. For instance, the Generali Future Fund report mentioned refers to the work by sociologist Helmut Anheier and another German think tank report makes use of Sherry Arnstein's (1969) classic ‘ladder of citizen
destination with FDI projects at record high. EY, [online] 27 May. Available at: http://www.ey.com/gl/en/newsroom/news-releases/news-ey-western-europe-overtakes-china-and-north-america-as-number-1-investment-destination [Accessed 25 June 2016].
González-González, E. and Nogués, S., 2016. Regional polycentricity: an indicator framework for assessing cohesion impacts of railway infrastructures. European Planning Studies , 24(5): 950–973.
Jackson, J. K., 2013. U.S. DirectInvestment Abroad: Trends and Current Issues. Congressional Research Service , [pdf] 11
., 2015. “One Belt One Road”: China’s great leap outward. European Council on Foreign Relations China Analysis, [online] June. Available at: http://www.ecfr.eu/page/-/China_analysis_belt_road.pdf .
Hongying Wang, 2016. A Deeper Look at China’s “Going Out” Policy”. CIGI Commentary, [online] March. Available at: https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/hongying_wang_mar2016_web.pdf .
Jakoby, M., 2016. Chiny bez makijazu. Warsaw: Muza.
Jakobowski, J., 2015. China’s foreigndirectinvestment within 16+1 cooperation formula: strategy
, [online] 6 November. Available at: http://english.mofcom.gov.cn/article/newsrelease/counselorsoffice/bilateralexchanges/201611/20161101651046.shtml [Accessed 20 November 2016].
Jacques, M., 2012. When China Rules the World. The End of the Western World and the Birth of a New Global Order . 2 nd Edition. London: Penguin Press.
Jakóbowski, J., 2015. China’s foreigndirectinvestments within the ‘16+1’ cooperation formula: strategy, institutions, and results. Commentary, OSW Centre for Eastern Studies , [online] November. Available at https
The topic of competitiveness is becoming increasingly significant in the context of modern economics. Considering intensive processes of globalisation alongside with competitive pressure amongst the countries, competitiveness has become a necessary condition for successful economic and social development of any country. Only by creating, enforcing and maintaining international competitiveness of the country, rapid economic growth during the long term is achievable. Amongst the other urgent issues, the European Union (further the EU) public policies are also focused on competitiveness. After the failure to implement the Lisbon strategy and become “the most dynamic and competitive knowledge-based economy”, the EU declared its new competitiveness aims in the long-term strategy Europe 2020. Promotion of competitiveness is one of the fundamental aims and priority directions of the EU structural policy. The EU structural support is engaged as one of the public policy measures to promote the competitiveness of the member-states. In this context, it is purposeful to research whether the structural support is used efficiently and whether it actually contributes to the implementation of the defined aims. Under the order of various Lithuanian institutions, numerous studies on the efficiency of the EU structural support have been carried out. Nevertheless, by analysing the impact of the EU structural support, insufficient attention has been paid to the aspect of competitiveness. Considering the fact that Lithuania has entered the third programming period 2014-2020, evaluation of the EU structural investment in the country has become even more topical - for successful implementation of the aims raised for this new period, the analysis of the previous results is relevant. This determined formulation of the research problem: what impact does the EU structural support have on the competitiveness of Lithuanian economics? The empirical research has revealed that the EU structural support has a positive impact on Lithuanian gross domestic product growth, promotes foreign direct investment, research and development expenditure and increases the number of operating entities during 2004-2014 period.