Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items for

  • Author: Bunthoon Nonthasoot x
Clear All Modify Search
Open access

Jade Suphapol, Boonchoo Sirichindakul, Bunthoon Nonthasoot and Supanit Nivatvongs


Background: Invasion of major hepatic vessels in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) generally prohibits the surgical treatment. Objective: Analyze outcomes of non-surgical approaches in this group of HCC. Methods: Retrospective review of medical records of 648 HCC admitted to King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital between January 2003 and December 2005 was carried out to select only patients who had unresectable HCC with vascular invasion and hepatic functions-Child-Pugh class-A. Vascular invasion was defined as involvement of portal vein, inferior vena cava (IVC), or their branches identified by imaging techniques. Non-surgical treatments were either transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or systemic chemotherapy (SCT) in addition to general supportive care. Treatment outcomes of the patients were analyzed. Results: Out of 71 unresectable HCC patients enrolled, 57patients were treated with TACE, while 14 received SCT. In the TACE group, 39 (68%), 7 (12%) and 11 (19%) patients had portal vein, IVC, and both vessels invasion, respectively. In the SCT group; 11 (78%), 1 (7%) and 2 (14%) had invasion of portal vein, IVC, and both vessels, respectively. Median overall survival in both groups was 158 days. Univariate analysis demonstrated that AFP level <1000 ng/mL, tumor size <10 cm, and SCT treatment significantly influenced survival. Additional multivariate analysis confirmed that diameters of tumor, and SCT were independent prognostic factors for good survival. A survival analysis showed longer survival in the SCT group than that of TACE (210 vs. 149 days, p=0.03) group. Conclusion: Survival of HCC patients with major vessels invasion was better when treated with SCT compared to TACE. Future prospective study in larger populations to test the hypothesis is warranted.

Open access

Boonchoo Sirichindakul, Virote Sriuranpong, Naruemon Wisedopas, Bunthoon Nonthasoot, Jade Suphapol and Supanit Nivatvongs


Background: Severe clinical hepatitis after imatinib treatment has been reported anecdotally. Hepatic tissue of patients with liver matastasis is often fragile and difficult to handle during liver resection from gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).

Objective: Observe hepatic tissue of these patients and examine the detailed histopathology underlying the change in the texture of non-tumorous hepatic parenchyma of these patients.

Materials and methods:We reviewed six GIST patients with liver metastases who underwent hepatic resection at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital between July 2004 and November 2005. Four patients did not have imatinib and two patients received imatinib for four and eight months before liver resection. Preoperative hepatic biochemistry profiles of all patients were unremarkable. We examined histopathology of non-tumorous hepatic parenchyma of these patients using H-E staining, and additional histochemistry for vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor using immunohistochemistry staining.

Results: In all patients, common histopathological changes were swelling of hepatocytes, diffuse parenchymal congestion, dilatation of central vein, and infiltration of portal tract by mononuclear cells. However, there was significant zone 3 hepatocytolysis only in patients who received imatinib treatment. Additionally, moderate degree of hepatic steatosis correlated well with the duration of imatinib exposure. Immunohistochemical study could not demonstrate any difference between these two groups.

Conclusion: In two cases of subclinical hepatotoxicity from exposure to imatinib, histopathologic findings were consistent with drug induced liver injury. Imatinib induced liver injury may be more common than obvious clinical hepatitis.

Open access

Wipusit Taesombat, Boonchoo Sirichindakul, Bunthoon Nonthasoot, Jade Suphapol, Methee Sutherasan and Supanit Nivatvongs



Major vascular invasion by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a poor prognostic factor. The outcome of hepatic resection for this advanced stage tumor remains unclear.


To clarify the outcome of hepatic resection for HCC with vascular invasion.


Between January 2005 and May 2013, 13 of 272 patients who underwent hepatic resection of HCC had a confirmed major portal or hepatic vein tumor thrombosis. The perioperative and long-term outcomes of this cohort of patients were retrospectively reviewed.


Ten of the 13 patients underwent preoperative transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). None showed tumor progression or liver function deterioration. All underwent hepatic resection with complete removal of tumor thrombus. The vascular resection margin was microscopically negative in all patients. Postoperative complications occurred in 62%. Most complications were pleural effusion, which necessitates percutaneous drainage. No perioperative mortality occurred. The median follow up time was 38.5 months (range 10–112). The median overall survival was 38.5 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence free survival was 93%, 36%, and 36%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5 year-overall survival was 93%, 76%, and 48%, respectively. Nine patients had intrahepatic tumor recurrence, extrahepatic recurrence, or both. Five with recurrence underwent TACE, radiofrequency ablation, or surgical resection. On univariate analysis, the only factor that tended to relate to worse overall survival was underlying liver cirrhosis (P = 0.056).


Hepatic resection for HCC with invasive thrombosis, combined with careful patient selection, close postoperative follow up, and early treatment of recurrence offers a chance of long-term survival.