Brain death as irreversible loss of a human’s moral status

Open access


Singer claims that there are two ways of challenging the fact that brain-dead patients, from whom organs are usually retrieved, are in fact biologically alive. By means of the first, the so called dead donor rule may be abandoned, opening the way to lethal organ donation. In the second, it might be posited that terms such as “life” and “death” do not have any primary biological meaning and are applicable to persons instead of organisms. This second possibility permits one to acknowledge that brain-dead patients are deceased because they are irreversibly unconscious. In the commentary which follows, I will argue that Singer’s second option is preferable since it (a) provides a higher amount of organs available for transplant, and (b) is better suited to the meaning of “death” which occurs in ordinary language. I will also defend such a concept of death against the objections raised by Michael Nair-Collins in the article Can the brain-dead be harmed or wronged? On the moral status of brain death and its implications for organ transplantation.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2015): Code of medical ethics of the American medical association. Chicago: American Medical Association.

  • BEAUCHAMP T. L. & CHILDRESS J. F. (2001): Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.

  • BERNAT J. (2013): Life or death for the dead-donor rule? In: The New England Journal of Medicine 369(14) pp. 1289–1291.

  • DAVIES J. K. (2007): Precedent autonomy advance directives and end-of-life care. In: B. Steinbock (ed.): The Oxford handbook of ethics. New York: Oxford University Press pp. 349–374.

  • DE TOMASO M. NAVARRO J. RICCI K. LORENZO M. LANZILLOTTI C. COLONNA F. RESTA M. LANCIONI G. & LIVREA P. (2013): Pain in prolonged disorders of consciousness: Laser evoked potentials findings in patients with vegetative and minimally conscious states. In: Brain Injury 27(7–8) pp. 962–972.

  • DWORKIN R. (1994): Life’s dominion: An argument about abortion euthanasia and individual freedom. New York: Vintage Books.

  • FEINBERG J. (1986): The moral limits of the criminal lawvol. 1: Harm to others. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • FERNÁNDEZ-ESPEJO D. & OWEN A. M. (2013): Detecting awareness after severe brain injury. In: Nature reviews neuroscience 14 pp. 801–809.

  • GALEWICZ W (2013): Status ludzkiego zarodka a etyka badań biomedycznych [The status of the human embryo and the ethics of the biomedical research]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

  • JAWORSKA A. & TANNENBAUM J. (2018): The Grounds of Moral Status. In: E. N. Zalta (ed.): The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2018 Edition) [online] [Retrieved September 9 2018]. Available at:

  • KANT I. (1991): The metaphysics of morals transl. Mary Gregor. New York Port Chester Melbourne & Sydney: Cambridge University Press.

  • KORSGAARD Ch. (1983): Two distinctions in goodness. In: The Philosophical Review 92(2) pp. 169–195.

  • LI D. HAWLEY Z. & SCHINER K. (2013): Increasing organ donation via changes in the default choice or allocation rule. In: Journal of Health Economics 32(6) pp. 1117–1129.

  • LIZZA J. P. (2006): Persons humanity and the definition of death. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

  • MAGNUS D. C. WILFOND B. S. & CAPLAN A. L. (2014): Accepting Brain Death. In: The New England Journal of Medicine 370(10) pp. 891–894.

  • MARQUIS D. (2010): Are DCD donors dead? In: The Hastings Center Report 40(3) pp. 24–31.

  • MCMAHAN J. (2002): The ethics of killing: Problems at the margins of life. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.

  • MILLER F. & TRUOG R. (2012): Death dying and organ transplantation. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.

  • MONTI M. M. VANHAUDENHUYSE A. COLEMAN M. R. BOLY M. PICKARD J. D. TSHIBANDA L. OWEN A. M. & LAUREYS S. (2010): Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. In: New England Journal of Medicine 362(7) pp. 578–589

  • NAGEL T. (1970): Death. In: Noûs 4(1) pp. 73–80.

  • NAIR-COLLINS M. (2017): Can the brain-dead be harmed or wronged?: On the moral status of brain death and its implications for organ transplantation. In: Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 27(4) pp. 525–559.

  • NAIR-COLLINS M. (2018): A biological theory of death: Characterization justification and implications. In: Diametros 55 pp. 27–43.

  • NAIR-COLLINS M. GREEN S. R. & SUTIN A. R. (2015): Abandoning the dead donor rule? A national survey of public views on death and organ donation. In: Journal of Medical Ethics 41(4) pp. 297–302.

  • NOWAK P. G. (2016): Umiarkowanie liberalna koncepcja śmierci jako uzasadnienie dla neurologicznych kryteriów śmierci [The moderately liberal concept of death as a basis for neurological criteria of death]. In: Przegląd Filozoficzny – Nowa Seria [Philosophical Review – New Series] 25(2) pp. 200–211.

  • NOWAK P. G. (2018a): Pobieranie narządów po zatrzymaniu krążenia. O nadrzędności neurologicznego kryterium śmierci nad krążeniowym – kwestie regulacyjne [Donation after circulatory determination of death: About the precedence of neurological criterion of death over circulatory criterion – regulatory issues]. In: Analiza i egzystencja [Analysis and existence] 42 pp. 35–53.

  • NOWAK P. G. (2018b): Pobieranie narządów po zatrzymaniu krążenia. O nadrzędności neurologicznego kryterium śmierci nad krążeniowym – kwestie filozoficzne [Donation after circulatory determination of death: About the precedence of neurological criterion of death over circulatory criterion – philosophical issues]. In: Analiza i Egzystencja [Analysis and existence] 42 pp. 55–71.

  • OWEN A. M. COLEMAN M. R. DAVIS M. H. BOLY M. LAUREYS S. & PICKARD J. D. (2006): Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. In: Science 313(5792) p. 1402.

  • POLISH MEDICAL CODE OF ETHICS [online] [Retrieved August 29 2018]. Available at:

  • POSNER J. B. SAPER C. B. SCHIFF N. D. & PLUM F. (2007): Plum and Posner’s Diagnosis of Stupor and Coma. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.

  • REGAN T. (1983/2004): The case for animal rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • RITHALIA A. MCDAID C. SUEKARRAN S. LINDSEY M. & SOWDEN A. (2009): Impact of presumed consent for organ donation on donation rates: a systematic review. In: BMJ 338 p. a3162.

  • SHEWMON A. D. (1998): Chronic “brain death”: Meta-analysis and conceptual consequences. In: Neurology 51(6) pp. 1538–1545.

  • SILVER D. (2003): Lethal injection autonomy and the proper ends of medicine. In: Bioethics 17(2) pp. 205–211.

  • SINGER P. (1994): Rethinking life and death: The collapse of our traditional ethics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

  • SINGER P. (2018): The challenge of brain death for the sanctity of life ethic. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe) 8(3–4) pp. 153–165.

  • TRUOG R. (2016): The price of our illusions and myths about the dead donor rule. In: Journal of Medical Ethics 42(5) pp. 318–319.

  • VEATCH R. M. (2003): The dead donor rule: True by definition. In: The American Journal of Bioethics 3(1) pp. 10–11.

  • VEATCH R. M. (2015): Killing by organ procurement: Brain-based death and legal fictions. In: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40(3) pp. 289–311.

  • VEATCH R. M. & ROSS L. F. (2015): Transplantation ethics. Washington D. C.: Georgetown University Press.

  • WARREN A. M. (1973): On the moral and legal status of abortion. In: The Monist 57(1) pp. 43–61.

  • WARREN A. M. (1997): Moral status. In: R. G. Frey & Ch. H. Wellman (eds.): A Companion to applied ethics. Malden MA: Blackwell pp. 439–450.

  • WILKINSON T. M. (2011): Ethics and the acquisition of organs. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.

  • WILKINSON T. M. & SAVULESCU J. (2012): Should we allow organ donation euthanasia? Alternatives for maximizing the number and quality of organs for transplantation. In: Bioethics 26(1) pp. 32–48.

  • YU T. LANG S. VOGEL D. MARKL A. MÜLLER F. & KOTCHOUBEY B. (2013): Patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome respond to the pain cries of other people. In: Neurology 80(4) pp. 345–352.

  • ŻURADZKI T. (2011): Rola świadomości w decyzjach dotyczących zaprzestania podtrzymywania funkcji życiowych [The role of consciousness in the end-of-life decisions]. In: Rocznik kognitywistyczny [Yearbook of cognitive science] 5 pp. 191–198.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.35

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.161

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 783 489 30
PDF Downloads 505 270 27