The Perception of Administrative Barriers and Their Implications for SMEs’ Performance: Evidence from Slovenia

Open access

Abstract

The importance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is widely recognised for the Slovenian economy. However, the issues regarding legislative and other administrative barriers and their perception by SMEs as a heterogeneous group of enterprises are not yet fully investigated. The main research hypothesis concerns that there exist significant differences in the perception of administrative barriers among characteristic SME groups. Consequently, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the key administrative barriers SMEs face in Slovenia. This entails three activities: (1) identifying the main areas in which barriers are found; (2) establishing what they imply performance-wise; and (3) providing policymaker guidelines tailored to different SME groups (size, legal form, sector, age). The empirical results, based on one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni post hoc tests on a sample of 925 SMEs, show differences in the various groups of SMEs mentioned above. Thus, it is shown that it is most promising to address the administrative barriers through an in-depth approach that targets specific enterprise groups and is reflected within guidelines for responsible policymakers.

Aristovnik, A., & Obadic, A. (2015). The impact and efficiency of public administration excellence on fostering SMEs in EU countries. Amfiteatru economic, 17(39), 761-774.

Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA). (2013). Accountants for small business. London: Association of Chartered Certified Accountants.

Djankov, S., McLiesh, C., & Ramalho, R.M. (2006). Regulation and growth. Economics Letters, 92(3), 395-401.

Edquist, C. (2001). The Systems of Innovation Approach and Innovation Policy: An account of the state of the art. In DRUID Conference, Aalborg: 12–15.

Edquist, C. (2010). Systems of innovation perspectives and challenges. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 2(3), 14-45.

European Commission. (2010). EUROPE 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. European commission: Brussels.

European Commission. (2006). Merjenje administrativnih stroškov in zmanjšanje administrativnih obremenitev v Evropski uniji. Brussels: European Commission.

European Commission. (2014). The High Level Group on Administrative Burdens – Questions and Answers. Brussels: European Commission.

European Commission. (2018). Interactive SME database 2016. Brussels: European Commission.

European Parliament. (2016). Barriers to SME growth in Europe. Strasbourg: European Parliament.

Government Office for Development and European Cohesion Policy. (2017). Slovenian Development Strategy 2030. Government of the Republic of Slovenia: Ljubljana.

Hooley, G., & Greenley, G. (2005). The resource underpinnings of competitive positions. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 13(2), 93−116.

Kemp, S.M., & Kemp, S. (2004). Business Statistics Demystified, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Koprić, I. (2012). Managing Public Affairs in South Eastern Europe: Muddled Governance. In A. M. Bissessar (ed.). Governance: Is it for everyone? Nova Science Publisher: Hauppauge.

Kovač, P. (2015). Developing New Governance Models and Administrative Practices in Central and Eastern Europe. In Kovač, P., & Gajduschek, G. (Eds). Contemporary Governance Models and Practices in Central and Eastern Europe. Selected Papers from the 22nd NISPAcee Annual Conference, May 22–24, 2014, Budapest, Hungary.

Lee, S., Dinis, M. C. D. S. N., Lowe, L., & Anders, K. (2016). Statistics for international social work and other behavioral sciences. Oxford University Press.

Merrilees, B., Rundle-Thiele, S., & Lye, A (2011). Marketing capabilities: Antecedents and implications for B2B SME performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(3), 368-375.

Milavec, U., & Klun, M. (2011). Familiarity with Measures to Reduce Administrative Burdens in the Public and Private Sector in Slovenia. Uprava, 11(1), pp. 7-23.

Ministry of Economic Development and Technology. (2009). Usposabljanje eVEM – Pogoji za opravljanje dejavnosti. Ljubljana: Ministry of Economic Development and Technology.

Ministry of the Interior. (2013). Enotna metodologija za merjenje stroškov, ki jih zakonodaja povzroča subjektom. Ljubljana: Ministry of the Interior.

Obadić, A., Aristovnik, A., & Ravšelj, D. (2017). Analysis of Administrative Barriers for SMEs in the Field of Labour Market Regulation. In 5th Annual Spain Business Research Conference.

Pasanen, M. (2003). In search of factors affecting SME performance. Kuopio: University of Kuopio.

Ropret, M., Fatur, P., Rodman, K., & Likar, B., 2012. Factors of successful innovation in services and a performance comparison with manufacturing sector. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 12(4), 379-401.

Ravšelj, D., & Aristovnik, A. (2018). Administrative Barriers for SMEs in the Field of Tax Compliance and Financial and Accounting Reporting: Evidence from Slovenia. Problemy Zarządzania, (1/2018 (73), t. 2), 75-90.

Segarra-Blasco, A., Garcia-Quevedo, J., & Teruel-Carrizosa, M. (2008). Barriers to Innovation and Public Policy in Catalonian. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(4), 431–451.

Slabe-Erker, R., & Klun, M. (2012). The contribution of institutional quality to lowering company compliance costs. African Journal of Business Management, 6(8), 3111-3119.

Tax, Financial and Legal Portal. (2016). Zakonodajni Supervizor. Available at: http://www.tax-fin-lex.si/stari/VeljavnaZakonodajaRs.aspx.

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2000). Promoting Transparency And Financial Disclosure: Accounting By Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

World Bank, 2018. Doing Business in the European Union 2018: Croatia, the Czech Republic, Portugal and Slovakia. Washington DC: World Bank.

World Economic Forum (WEF). (2015). Global competitiveness report 2015–2016. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

World Economic Forum (WEF). (2017). Global competitiveness report 2017–2018. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

World Economic Forum (WEF). (2018). Global competitiveness report 2018. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 37 37 14
PDF Downloads 39 39 10