New Miocene Monachinae from the Western Shore of the Chesapeake Bay (Maryland, USA)

  • 1 Laboratory of Evolutionary Biology, Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Howard University, 520 W St. NW, , Washington, U.S.A
  • 2 Paleo Quest 4657, Sudley Road, , Catharpin, U.S.A


The Family Phocidae includes four subfamilies (Phocinae, Monachinae, Cystophorinae, and Devinophocinae) consisting of mediumto large-sized mammals that possess distinctive adaptations to semi-aquatic life. In the Miocene of the Chesapeake Group, only two subfamilies of the Family Phocidae were identified: Phocinae and Monachinae. Leptophoca, a representative of the subfamily Phocinae, appears on the eastern shore of the North Atlantic around 16 million years ago. Recently, two new monachine species, the larger Terranectes magnus (n. gen., n. sp.) and the medium-sized T. parvus (n. sp.), were recorded in the Upper Miocene of the Chesapeake Group in the Eastover Formation (7.0–6.0 Ma) and St. Marys Formation (10.0-8.0 Ma). These two distinct subfamilies of seals indicate a well-marked divergence between phocines and monachines, much earlier than 18 million years ago, as previously suggested. The Eastover Formation was deposited in a shallow embayment that covered southern Maryland, the coastal plain of Virginia, and the northeastern corner of North Carolina. The geologically older St. Marys Formation represents a tide-influenced coastal environment, with low-salinity estuaries. There was a sharp temperature decrease in the Late Miocene, indicated by a shift to a cooler-water fish fauna during St. Marys time. The Eastover Formation reflects warmer waters with relatively strong currents, significant shoals, barriers, and varied depths. Fossil evidence of earlier seals suggests that phocids originated in the North Atlantic and otarioids in the North Pacific. True seals diverged from ancient Carnivora in the early Oligocene (or earlier) in the Paratethyan / Mediterranean Basins, spread widely during the Middle Miocene and crossed westward across the Atlantic Ocean, before dispersing in the eastern United States by the Early Pliocene.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Amson, E., Muizon, C. de. 2014. A new durophagous phocid (Mammalia: Carnivora) from the late Neogene of Peru and considerations on monachine seals phylogeny. Journal of Systematic Paleontology, 1-26, DOI: 10.1080/14772019.2013.799610.

  • Antoniuk, A. A. 1979. Comparative morphology of the axial skeleton of the Pinnipeds. Ph.D thesis. Moscow, 1-24 [In Russian].

  • Ärnason, U., Gullberg, A.,Janke, A., Kullberg, M., Lehman, N., Petrov, E. A., Väinölä, R. 2006. Pinniped Phylogeny and a new Hypothesis for their origin and dispersal. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 41, 345-354.

  • Barnes, L. G., Mitchell, E. D. 1975. Late Cenozoic northeast Pacifi c Phocidae. Rapports et Procesverbaux des Reunions, Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer., 169, 3442.

  • Barnes, L. G., Ray, C. E, Koretsky, I. A. 2006. A New Pliocene Sea Lion, Proterozetes ulysses (Mammalia: Otariidae) from Oregon, USA. In: Csiki, Z., ed. Mesozoic and Cenozoic Vertebrates and Paleoenvironments. Tribute to the Career of Professor Dan Grigorescu. Ars Docendi, Bucharest, 57-77.

  • Berta, A., Kienle, S., Bianucci, G., Sorbi, S. 2015. A reevaluation of Pliophoca etrusca (Pinnipedia, Phocidae) from the Pliocene of Italy: phylogenetic and biogeographic implications. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 35, DOI 10.1080/02724634.2014.889144.

  • Boessenecker, R. W. 2013. Taphonomic Implications of barnacle encrusted sea lion bones from the Middle Pleistocene Port Orford Formation, coastal Oregon. Journal of Paleontology, 87, 657-663.

  • Cozzuol, M. A. 2001. “Northern” seal from the Miocene of Argentina: Implications for phocidphylogeny and biogeography. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 21, 415-421.

  • Dewaele, L., Lambert, O., Louwye, S. 2017. On Prophoca and Leptophoca (Pinnipedia, Phocidae) from the Miocene of the North Atlantic realm: redescription, phylogenetic affi nities and paleobiogeographic implications. Peer J., 5, e3024, DOI 10.7717/peerj.3024.

  • Edwards, L. E., Barron, J. A., Bukry, D., Bybell, L. M., Cronin, T. M., Poag, C. W., Weems, R. E., Wingard, G. L. 2005. Paleontology of the upper Eocene to Quaternary postimpact section in the USGS-NASA Langley core, Hampton, Virginia, chap. H. In: Horton, J. W., Jr., Powars, D. S., and Gohn, G. S., eds. Studies of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure - Th e USGS-NASA Langley corehole, Hampton, Virginia, and related coreholes and geophysical surveys. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1688, p. H1-H47, 9 fossil plates, 2 oversize fi gures.

  • Ehret, D. J., Macfadden, B. J., Jones, D. S., De Vries, T. J., Foster, D. A., Salas-Gismondi, R. 2012. Origin of the white shark Carcharodon (Lamniformes: Lamnidae) based on recalibration of the Upper Neogene Pisco Formation of Peru. Paleontology, 55, 1139-1153.

  • Frenguelli, J. 1922. Prionodelphisrovereti, unrepresentante de la familia “Squalodontidae” en la Paranesse superior de Entre Rios. Boletin de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias en Cordoba (Republica Argentina), 25, 491-500.

  • Fyler, C. A., Reeder, T. W., Berta, A., Antonelis, G., Aguilar, A., Androukaki, E. 2005. Historical Biogeography and Phylogeny of monachine seals (Pinnipedia: Phocidae) based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA data. Journal of Biogeography, 32, 1267-1279.

  • Ginsburg, L., Janvier, P. 1975. Les mammiferes marins des faluns de la Touraine et de l’Anjou: faune, sistemas, et paleobiologie. Bulletin de la Societe d’Etudes Scientifi ques de l’Anjou., 9, 73-96.

  • Les Phoques (Phocidae, Pinnipedia, Carnivora, Mammalia) des faluns Miocenes de l’Anjou. 1999. Bulletin dela-Societedes sciences naturellesde l’Ouest de la France, 21, 169-178.

  • Goldin, P. E., Pilipenko, D. A. 2012. New fi ndings of seal Monachopsis pontica from Neogene of Kerch Peninsula. In: Lopatin, A.V., Parkhaev, P.Yu. & Rozanov, A.Yu., eds. Modern paleontology: classical and newest methods: the Ninth All-Russian Scientifi c School for Young Scientists in Paleontology (October 1-3, 2012, Borissiak Paleontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow): book of abstracts, p. 17 [In Russian].

  • Gottfried, M. D., Bohaska, D. J., Whitmore, F. C. 1994. Miocene Cetaceans of the Chesapeake Group. In: Berta, A. and Deméré, T. A., eds. Contributions in Marine Mammal Paleontology Honoring Frank C. Whitmore, Jr. : Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History,29, 229-238.

  • Kidwell, S. 2006. Challenges in Paleoenvironmental Interpretation of the Maryland Miocene.Th e Geology and Paleontology of Calvert Cliff s. A Symposium to celebrate the 25th anniversary of the Calvert Marine Museum’s Fossil Club, 19-21.

  • Koretsky, I. A. 2001. Morphology and Systematics of Miocene Phocinae (Mammalia: Carnivora) from Paratethys and the North Atlantic Region. Geologica Hungarica, Budapest, 54, 1-109.

  • Koretsky, I. A., Grigorescu, D. 2002. Th e Fossil Monk Seal Pontophocasarmatica (Alekseev) (Mammalia: Phocidae: Monachinae) from the Miocene of Eastern Europe. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 93, 149-162.

  • Koretsky, I. A., Holec, P. 2002. A primitive Seal (Mammalia: Phocidae) from the Early Middle Miocene of Central Paratethys. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 93, 163-178.

  • Koretsky, I. A., Sanders, A. 2002. Paleontology of the Late Oligocene Ashley and Chandler Bridge Formations of South Carolina, 1: PaleogenePinniped Remains. Th e Oldest Known Seal (Carnivora: Phocidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 93, 179-184.

  • Koretsky, I. A., Barnes, L. G. 2006. Pinniped Evolutionary History and Paleogeography. In: Csiki, Z., ed. Mesozoic and Cenozoic Vertebrates and Paleoenvironments. Tribute to the Career of Professor Dan Grigorescu. Ars Docendi, Bucharest. 143, 1-153.

  • Koretsky, I. A., Ray, C. E. 2008. Phocidae of the Pliocene of Eastern USA. In: Ray, C. E., Bohaska, D., Koretsky, I. A., Ward, L. W. and Barnes, L.G., eds. Geology and Paleontology of the Lee Creek Mine, North Carolina, IV, Virginia Museum of Natural History Special Publication,15, 81-140.

  • Koretsky, I. A., Ray, C. E., Peters, N. 2012. A new species of Leptophoca (Carnivora, Phocidae, Phocinae) from both sides of the North Atlantic Ocean (Miocene seals of Th e Netherlands, part I). Deinsea, 15 Annual of the Natural History Museum Rotterdam, 1-12.

  • Koretsky, I. A., Rahmat, S. J. 2013. First Record of Fossil Cystophorinae (Carnivora, Phocidae): Middle Miocene Seals form the Northern Paratethys. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologie e Stratigraphie, 119, 325-350.

  • Koretsky, I. A., Domning, D. P. 2014. One of the oldest seals (Carnivora, Phocidae) from the Old World. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 34, 224-229.

  • Koretsky, I. A., Rahmat, S. J. 2015. A New Species of the Subfamily Devinophocinae (Carnivora: Phocidae) from the Central Paratethys. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafi a, 121 (1), 1-17.

  • Koretsky, I. A., Barnes, L. G., Rahmat, S. J. 2016. Re-evaluation of morphological characters questions current views of pinniped origins. Vestnik Zoologii, 50 (4), 327-354.

  • McKenna, M. C., Bell, S. K. 1997. Classifi cation of Mammals above the Species Level. Columbia University Press, New York, 1-631.

  • Miller, M. E., Christensen, G. C., Evans, H. E. 1964. Anatomy of the dog. W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, London, 1-941.

  • Mitchell, E. D., Tedford, R. H. 1973. Th e Enaliarctinae: A new group of extinct aquatic Carnivora and a consideration of the origin of the Otariidae. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 151, 203-284.

  • Muizon, C de, Hendey, Q. B. 1980. Late Tertiary seals of the South Atlantic Ocean. Annals of the South African Museum, 82, 91-128.

  • Muizon, C de.1981a. Les vertébrés fossiles de la formation Pisco (Pérou). Premiere partie. Deux nouveaux Monachinae (Phocidae, Mammalia) du Pliocene du Sud-Sacaco. Institut Francais d’Etudes Andines, 6, 1-150.

  • Muizon, C de. 1981 b. Premier signalement de Monachinae (Phocidae: Mammalia) dans le Sahelien (Miocene Supérieur) d’Oran (Algérie). Palaeovertebrata, 11, 181-94.

  • Muizon, C de. 1981 c. Paleontologie - Une interprétation fonctionnelle et phylogénétique de l’insertion du psoas major chez les Phocidae. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences Paris, 292, 687-862.

  • Muizon, C de. 1982. Les relations phylogenetiques des Lutrinae (Mustelidae, Mammalia). Geobios, memoire special, 6, 259-272.

  • Piérard, J. 1971. Osteology and myology of the Weddell seal Leptophoca weddelli Lesson, 1826. In: Burt, W. H., ed. Antarctic Pinnipedia.Antarctic Research Series of the National Academy of Sciences National Research Cente,. 18,53-108.

  • Powars, D. S., Bruce, T. S. 1999. Th e eff ects of the Chesapeake Bay impact crater on the geological framework and correlation of hydrogeologic units of the Lower York-James Peninsula, Virginia. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1612, 1-82.

  • Rahmat, S. J., Koretsky, I. A. 2016. First record of postcranial bones in Devinophoca emryi (Carnivora, Phocidae, Devinophocinae). Vestnik Zoologii, 50 (1), 71-84.

  • Ray, C. E. 1976. Phoca wymani and other Tertiary seals (Mammalia: Phocidae) described from the eastern seaboard of North America. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 28, 1-33.

  • Ray, C. E. 1977. Geography of phocid evolution. Systematic Zoology, 25, 391-406.

  • Repenning, C. A., Ray, C. E. 1977. Th e origin of the Hawaiian Monk seal. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 89, 667-688.

  • Repenning, C. A., Ray, C. E., Grigorescu, D. 1979. Pinniped biogeography. In: Gray, J. and Boucot, A. J. eds. Historical biogeography, plate tectonics, and the changing environment. Oregon State University Press, 357369.

  • Sepkoski, J. J. 2002. A compendium of fossil marine animal genera. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 363, 1-560.

  • Tedford, R. H. 1977. Relationship of pinnipeds to other carnivores (Mammalia). Systematic Zoology, 25, 363374.

  • Van Beneden, P. J. 1876. Les Phoques Fossiles du bassin d’Anvers. Bulletin de l’AcademieRoyale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-arts de Belgique, 45 ann., 2 ser, 41, 783-802, Brussels.

  • Walsh, S., Naish, D. 2002. Fossil seals from Late Neogene deposits in South America: a new pinniped (Carnivora, Mammalia) assemblage from Chile. Palaeontology, 45, 821-842.

  • Ward, L. W., Blackwelder, B. W. 1980. Stratigraphic revision of upper Miocene and lower Pliocene beds of the Chesapeake Group, middle Atlantic Coastal Plain, Contributions to stratigraphy. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 1482-D, 1-61.

  • Weems, R. E., Schindler, J. S., Lewis, W. C. 2010-11. Detailed sections from auger holes in the Emporia 1:100,000-scale quadrangle, North Carolina and Virginia. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 1-288.

  • Wolsan, M. 1993. Phylogeny and classifi cation of early European Mustelidae (Mammalia: Carnivora). Acta Th eriologica, 38, 345-384.

  • Wozencraft , C. 1989. Th e phylogeny of the Recent Carnivora. In: Gittleman, J. L., ed. Carnivore Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution, New York, 495-535.

  • Wyss, A. R., Flynn, J. J. 1993. A phylogenetic analysis and defi nition of the Carnivora. In: Szalay, F. S., Novacek, M. J., McKenna, M. C., eds. Mammal Phylogeny: Placentals. Springer, New York, 32-53.


Journal + Issues