“Bus Lane Within The Area Of Intersection” Method For Buses Priority On The Intersections

Open access

Abstract

The primary objective of this article is to formalize the “special bus lanes within the area of intersection” method that allows providing buses with space-time priority at signalized intersections (mostly of the isolated type), including those with no more than two traffic lanes in each direction at the approaches to the intersection. The article establishes the limits for efficient application of this method, and describes the results of a simulation experiment conducted in the VISSIM environment to investigate the functioning of the method on an actual intersection. The most critical phase of implementation of this method is to determine the optimum length of the special bus lane at the approach to the intersection. The optimum length of special bus lanes at the approaches to isolated or coordinated intersections is determined based on the maximum length of queued vehicles which is computed using the simulation models developed in the Objective-C language. The article covers the basic characteristics of those models, their structure and building principles, and also provides the model validation results. Simulation models can be used both for determination of the optimum length of special bus lanes at the approaches to signalized intersections and for analysis of intersection performance based on the maximum length of queued vehicles.

1. Abdelghany, K. F., Mahmassani, H. S., Abdelghany, A. F. (2007) A Modeling Framework for Bus Rapid Transit Operations Evaluation and Service Planning. Transportation Planning and Technology, vol. 30, issue 6, pp. 571-591.

2. Angus, P. Davol. (2001) Modeling of traffic signal control and transit signal priority strategies in a microscopic simulation laboratory. Massachusetts institute of technology, 118.

3. Balke, K., Dudek, C., Urbanik II T. (2000) Development and evaluation of intelligent bus priority concept. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 1727, pp. 12-19.

4. Bus rapid transit / Planning guide (2007) New York.: 3ed edition, 825.

5. Ding, L., Zhang, N., Qian, Z. D. (2014) Analysis of Managed Bus Lane Strategies Based on Microcosmic Traffic Simulation. Advanced Materials Research, vol. 1079-1080, pp. 440-447.

6. Ekeila, W., Sayed, T., Esawey, M. E. (2009) Development of dynamic transit signal priority strategy. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 2111, pp. 1-9.

7. Example collection about the guidelines for traffic signal systems (2010). Research society for roads - and Transportation, Cologne, 92.

8. Garrow, M., Machemehl R. (1997) Development and evaluation of transit signal priority strategies. Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, 147.

9. Highway Capacity Manual (2000) TRB, Washington, DC, 1134 p.

10. Inose, H., Khamada, T. (1983) Road traffic control. Moscow, USSR, Transport, 248.

11. Klinkovshtein, H. I., Afanasiev, M. B. (2001) Traffic management. Moscow, Transport, 247.

12. Kremenets, Y. A., Pechersii, M. B. (2005) Technical means of traffic management. Moscow, 279.

13. Lin Y., Yang X., Zou N., Franz M. (2015) Transit signal priority control at signalized intersections: a comprehensive review. Transportation Letters: the International Journal of Transportation Research, vol. 7, issue 3, pp. 168-180.

14. Manual for the design of road traffic facilities (2001) Federal Highway Research Institute. October, 370.

15. Ma W., Yang X. (2008) Efficiency Analysis of Transit Signal Priority Strategies on Isolated Intersection. Journal of System Simulation, issue 12, pp. 184-191.

16. Przhibyl, P., Svitek, M. (2003). Telematic in transport (translation from Czech). Moscow, 540.

17. Polischuk, V. P., Dzyuba, O. P. (2008) Theory of traffic flow: models and methods of traffic management. Kyiv, 175.

18. Shelkov, Y. D. (1995) Traffic management in the cities. Moscow, 143.

19. Scnabel, W. (1997) Fundamentals of traffic engineering and transport planning. Volume 1: Traffic Systems, 2nd edition, Berlin, publisher of Construction mbH, 590.

20. Skabardonis, A. (2000) Control Strategies for Transit Priority. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 1727, pp. 20-26

21. Vikovych, I. A., Zubachyk R. M. (2013a) Development of method for bus priority on the intersection. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. Scientific Journal, no. 6/4 (54), pp. 28-34.

22. Vikovych, I. A., Zubachyk R. M. (2013b) Development of simulation model for determination of the maximum length of queued vehicles. Herald of the National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kharkiv, no. 65, pp. 27-33.

23. Vikovych, I. A., Zubachyk R. M. (2013c) Simulation model development for determination of the maximum length of queued vehicles on adjacent direction to coordinated intersection. “Technology audit and production reserves” journal. Scientific Journal, no. 6/1(14), pp. 19-26.

24. Vikovych, I. A., Zubachyk R. M., Bespalov D. O. (2014) Efficiency determination of method “bus lane within the area of intersection” from the standpoint of priority in time. “Technology audit and production reserves” journal. Scientific Journal, no. 5/1(19), pp. 40-45.

25. Wie, L., Zhang, L., Wang, Z. (2013) Cellular automata moderl on bus signal priority strategies considering resource constraints. Practical application of intelligent systems: Proceedings of the eighth international conference on intelligent systems and knowledge engineering, Shenzhen, China, pp. 689-706.

Transport and Telecommunication Journal

The Journal of Transport and Telecommunication Institute

Journal Information


Cite Score 2017: 1.21

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.294
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.539

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 148 148 12
PDF Downloads 107 107 13