Benchmarking and Assessment of Good Practices in Public Transport Information Systems

Open access

Abstract

The development of the Public Transport (PT) services in the last decade is characterized by wide implementation of various information systems and technologies, which cover different transport services, such as traffic planning, traffic network monitoring, management of operation of PT fleets, providing information to the passengers, ticketing payment, etc. The article considers the research part of a large EU-funded project POLITE aimed at public transport sector and increasing the awareness of infomobility services and PT attractiveness through the application of identified Good Practices and Best Practices. The objective of this paper is presentation of the methodology of benchmarking and assessment of Good Practices and choice of the best one on the basis of the multi-criteria comparative analysis. For assessment of Good Practices the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method is applied.

1. Ambrosino, G., Boero, M., Nelson, J.D., Romanazzo, M. (2010). Infomobility Systems andSustainable Transport services. Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development: ENEA.

2. Arena, M., Azzone, G., Franchi, F., Malpezzi, S. (2012). An Integrated Framework for Infomobility. In Proceedings of the Third International Engineering Systems Symposium, CESUN 2012, June 2012. Netherlands, Delft: Delft University of Technology.

3. Canali, C., Lancellotti, R. (2006). A distributed architecture to support infomobility services. ACM Digital library.

4. INTERREG IVC. Glossary. Available at - http://www.interreg4c.eu/glossary/#g

5. POLITE Project. (2012-2013). Policy Learning in Information Technologies for Public TransportEnhancement. Available at - http://www.polite-project.eu/polite-project

6. Saaty, T.L. (2001). Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in aComplex World, New Edition 2001 (Analytic Hierarchy Process Series, Vol. 2), RWS Publications.

7. Sterle, C. (2009). Location-Routing models and methods for freight distribution and infomobility incity logistics, PhD Thesis. Università degli Studi di Napoli ‘Federico II’, Napoli, Italy.

8. T-TRANS Project. (2013). Report Deliverable 3.1 - ITS state of the art assessment. Available at - http://www.ttransnetwork.eu/ttrans/wpcontent/uploads/2013/05/D3_1_TTRANS_ITS_state_of_the_art_assessment.pdf

9. Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Transport and Telecommunication Journal

The Journal of Transport and Telecommunication Institute

Journal Information


Cite Score 2017: 1.21

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.294
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.539

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 133 133 12
PDF Downloads 64 64 4