Probabilistic Model on Buying Decision of Higher Education Services

Open access

Abstract

Buying decisions are determined by two key factors: endogenous factor that belongs to the buyer (which is present at least the attitudinal variable) and exogenous factors such demo-economic, sociological, psychological, marketing mix, linked all more or less by the product or the service offered for purchase and consumption. The study aims to use Rasch’s model to express the likelihood that a consumer will make the decision to purchase a higher educational service. Applied to item solving, Rasch probabilistic model, on which the research methodology study is largely supported, states that the probability of success in solving an item depends on two factors. The one belongs to that who solves the item - the human factor, called the latent trait, and the other belongs to the item, called the facility of the item The purchase decision approach using the Rasch model results validity is mainly based on the isometry of the two situations The results of the study describe behavioral probability situations where customers who make university education services purchasing decisions can themselves be found. We recommend the educational marketing strategies based on the analysis made on the applied model, which may increase the students’ enrolled number in a particular university.

1. Boadé, G. (2013), Robustesse du modèle de Rasch unidimensionnel à la violation de l’hypothèse d’unidimensionnalité, in http://hdl.handle.net/1866/994 [accessed on 20.02.2018]

2. Fischer, G. (1974), Einfûhrung in die psychologische Testtheorie, Bern, Ed. Huber

3. Hambleton, R. K. & Russel, W. J. (1993), Comparison of classical test theorty and item response theory and their application to test development. Educational Measurement: Issues and practice, p. 38-47

4. Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H. & Rogers, H. J. (1991), Fundamentals of item response theory, California, SAGA publications

5. Jacoby, J., Szybillo, G. & Busato-Sehach, J. (1977), Information Acquisition Behavior in Brand Choice Situations, Journal of Marketing Research, p. 63-69

6. Jacoby, J., Olson, J. C. & Haddock R. (1971), Price, Brand Name, and Product Composition Characteristics as Determinants of Perceived Quality, Journal of Consumer Research 3, no. 4, p. 209-216

7. Kotler Ph., Armstrong G. (2012), Principles of marketing – 14th ed., New Jersey, Ed. Prentice Hall

8. Kotler Ph., Keller K. L., (2008), Managementul marketingului – ed. V, București, Editura Teora

9. Kotler Ph., Fox K., (1995), Strategic Marketing for Educational Institutions - second ed., New Jersey, Ed. Prentice-Hall

10. Opariuc-Dan, C., (2012), Caracteristici ale modelelor de evaluare psihologică bazate pe Teoria Răspunsului la Item in https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Cristian_Opariuc-Dan/publication/229150476_ [accessed on 18.01.2018]

11. Stan, A, (2000), Statistică aplicată în psihologie, Iași, Editura Polirom

12. Stone, M. A., Desmond, J., (2007), Fundamentals of Marketing, London & New York, Ed. Routledge

13. Tulin Erdem, (1998), Brand Equity as a Signaling Phenomenon, Journal of Consumer Psychology 7, no.1998, p. 131-157

14. Vorzsák Á. et al. (2004), Marketingul serviciilor, Cluj-Napoca, Editura Presa Universitară Clujeană

15. Central Intelligence Agency, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/resources/theworld-factbook/geos/ro.html [accessed on 14.02.2018]

17. http://www.vorkauf.ch/ Evaluation à référence critérielle: Présentation du modèle de Rasch [accessed on 20.02.2018]