How is environmental performance associated with economic growth? A world cross-country analysis

Open access

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to explore the association between environmental performance and income level in the world economy in 2016. Data from Yale University and World Bank are used in a cross-country regression analysis comprising 166 countries. The gross Domestic Product per capita (based in purchased power parity, constant 2011 international dollars) in these countries is positively associated with the environmental performance index (EPI) calculated by Yale and Columbia University in 2016. Furthermore, the causality of this relationship is from GDP per capita to Environmental Performance and both Environmental Health (EH) and Ecosystem Vitality (EV) are positively associated with GDP per capita. Environmental Health (EH) is stronger related to GDP per capita, meaning that investments in public health, sanitation and infrastructure are increasing as countries develop.

1. Ardelean, D.I., David, D. (2013). The reflection of the cost-efficiency coefficient of the environment policies in the European Union and the Member States. Studia Universitatis “Vasile Goldiș” Arad, Economic Series, Vol.23, Issue 3, pp.14-20.

2. Bertinelli, L., Strobl, E. (2005). The environmental Kuznets curve semi-parametrically revisited. Economics Letters, Vol.88, pp.350–357.

3. Bimonte, S. (2002). Information access, income distribution, and the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecological Economics, Vol.41, Issue 1, pp.145–156.

4. Booth, H. (2017). The Environmental Kuznets Curve. The validity of Kuznets Curve and its Policy Implications. World Economics, Vol.18, No.1, pp.145-152.

5. Bulte, E.H., van Soest, D.P. (2001). Environmental degradation in developing countries: households and the (reverse) environmental Kuznets curve. Journal of Development Economics, Vol.65, pp.225–235.

6. Cole, M.A., Rayner, A.J., Bates, J.M. (1997). The Environmental Kuznets Curve: an empirical analysis. Environment and Development Economics, Vol.2, pp.401–416.

7. Caviglia-Harris, J.L., Chambers, D., and Kahn, J.R. (2009). Taking the ‘U’ out of Kuznets-A Comprehensive analysis of the EKC and environmental degradation. Ecological Economics, Vol. 68, pp. 1149–1159.

8. de Bruyn, S.M., van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., Opschoor, J.B. (1998). Economic growth and emissions: reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental Kuznets curves. Ecological Economics, Vol.25, pp.161–175.

9. Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey. Ecological Economics, Vol.49, Issue 4, pp.431-455.

10. Dinda, S. (2005). A theoretical basis for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics, Vol.53, pp.403-413.

11. Grossman G. and Krueger, A. (1995). Economic Growth and the Environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.110, Issue 2, pp.353-377.

12. Holtz-Eakin, D., Selden, T.M. (1992). Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth. NBER Working Paper 4248.

13. Harbaugh, W., Levinson, A., Wilson, D. (2002). Re-examining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets curve. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 84, pp.541–551.

14. Hsu, A. et al. (2016). 2016 Environmental Performance Index. New Haven, CT: Yale University. Available: www.epi.yale.edu. Accessed 17 June 2017.

15. Islam, N. (1997). Income-Environment Relationship. How different is Asia? Asian Development Review, Vol.15.No.1, pp.18-51.

16. Islam, N., Vincent, J., Panayotou, T. (1998). Unveiling the Income-Environment Relationship: An Exploration into the Determinants of Environmental Quality. Available at: http://economics.emory.edu/home/documents/workingpapers/islam_98_12_paper.pdf Accessed 10 July 2017.

17. Jha, R. & Murthy. KVB (2003). An Inverse Global Environmental Kuznets Curve. Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol.31, Issue 2, pp. 352–368.

18. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and economic inequality. American Economic Review, Vol.45, pp.1-28.

19. Lee, J., List, J.A. (2004). Examining trends of criteria air pollutants: ere the effects of government intervention transitory?. Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol.29, 21–37

20. Moomaw, W.R., Unruh, G.C. (1997). Are Environmental Kuznets curves misleading us? The case of CO2 emissions. Environment and Development Economics, Vol.2, pp.451–463.

21. Munasinghe, M. (1999). Is environmental degradation an inevitable consequence of economic growth: tunneling through the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics, Vol.29, Issue 1, pp. 89 – 109.

22. OECD (2003). OECD Environmental Indicators. Development, Measurement and Use. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/env/indicators-modelling-outlooks/24993546.pdf Accessed 1 July 2017.

23. Panayotou, T. (1997). Demystifying the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Turning a Black Box into a Policy Tool. Available at: http://www.cid.harvard.edu/archive/esd/pdfs/iep/643.pdf Accessed 4 July 2017.

24. Perman, R., Stern, D.I. (2003). Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the Environmental Kuznets Curve does not exist. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Vol.47, pp.325–347

25. Saboori, B., Sulaiman, J., and Mohd, S. (2011). Economic growth and CO 2 emissions in Malaysia: a cointegration analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy, Vol.51, pp.184-191.

26. Selden, T.M., Song, D. (1994). Environmental quality and development: is there a kuznets curve for air pollution emissions?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 27, Issue2, pp.147–162.

27. Selden, T.M., Song, D. (1995). Neoclassical growth, the J curve for abatement and the inverted U curve for pollution. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol.29, Issue 2, pp.162–168.

28. Shahbaz, M., Lean, H.H., and Shabbir, M.S. (2012). Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in Pakistan: Cointegration and Granger Causality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol 16, pp. 2947–2953.

29. Shafik, N. and Bandyopadhyay, S. (1992). Economic Growth and Environmental Quality-Time Series and Cross-Country Evidence. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, WPS 904.

30. Shafik, N. (1994). Economic development and environmental quality: an econometric analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, Vol.46, pp.757–773.

31. Shen, J. (2006). A simultaneous estimation of Environmental Kuznets Curve: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, Vol 17, pp. 383–394.

32. Seppälä, T., Haukioja, T., and Kaivo-oja, J. (2001). The EKC Hypothesis Does Not Hold for Direct Material Flows: Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis Tests for Direct Material Flows in Five Industrial Countries. Population and Environment, Vol 23, Issue2, pp. 217-238.

33. Stern, D.I. (1998). Progress on the environmental Kuznets curve?. Environment and Development Economics Vol.3, Issue 2, pp.173–196.

34. Stern, D.I., Common, M.S. (2001). Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulphur?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol.41, pp.162–178.

35. Stern, D.I. (2004). The Rise and Fall of Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Development, Vol.32, No.8, pp.1418-1439.

36. Taguchi, H. (2012). The Environmental Kuznets Curve in Asia: The Case of Sulphur and Carbon Emissions. Asia-Pacific Development Journal, Vol 19, pp. 77–92.

37. Tisdell, C. (2001). Globalisation and sustainability: environmental Kuznets curve and the WTO. Ecological Economics, Vol.39, Issue 2, pp.185–196.

38. Tiwari, A.K., Shahbaz, M., and Hye, Q.M.A. (2013). The Environmental Kuznets Curve and the Role of Coal Consumption in India: Cointegration and Causality Analysis in an Open Economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol 18, pp. 519–527.

39. UNDP. (2016). Human Development Report 2016. Human Development for Everyone. Washington DC, USA.

40. http://epi.yale.edu/reports/2016-report. Accessed 30 June 2017