A Model of Socially Responsible Organizational Culture

Open access

Abstract

While scholarly literature abounds with research on organizational culture and CSR, this study adds knowledge to the field, redefining a new concept: that of socially responsible organizational culture. In our opinion, socially responsible organizational culture encompasses all the values, beliefs, norms and strategies that facilitate, direct, operate and develop the relations between organization and stakeholders in order to harmonize these relationships and increase economic, social and environmental performance. This paper creates a conceptual model of socially responsible organizational culture and presents a methodology for evaluating socially responsible organizational culture in the EU Member States. Results show significant variations between states, explained by differences in national culture, attitude and focus on CSR actions.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Adler N. 1986. International Dimensions of Organizational Behaviour. Boston: McGraw Hill.

  • 2. Ashforth B.E. Gioia D.A. Robinson S.L. and Trevino L.K. 2008. Introduction to special topic forum re-viewing organizational corruption. Academic of Management Review 33(3) pp.670-684.

  • 3. Berger I.E. Cunningham P. and Drumwright M.E. 2007. Mainstreaming corporate social responsibility: developing markets for virtue. California Management Review 4. 49 pp.132-157.

  • 5. Bibu N. Nastase M. and Gligor D.C. 2010. The perception over Corporate Social Responsibility in Romania. Review of International Comparative Management 11(5) pp.764-778.

  • 6. Boons F. and Ludeke-Freund F. 2013. Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-theart steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaning Production 45 pp.p-19.

  • 7. Carroll A. 1991. The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons 34 pp.39-48.

  • 8. Certo S. 2002. Managementul modern. BucureSti: Teora Publishing House.

  • 9. Cooke R.A. and Rousseau D.M. 1988. Behavioural norms and expectations: a quantitative approach to the assessment of organizational culture. Group Organization Studies 13 pp.245-273.

  • 10. Doppelt B. 2003. Leading Change Toward Sustainability. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

  • 11. Dutta S. Lanvin B. and Wunsch-Vincent S. 2016. The Global Innovation Index 2016: Winning with Global Innovation. Available at: . Accesed 9 January 2017.

  • 12. Earle H.A. 2003. Building a workplace of choice: Using the work environment to attract and retain top talent. Journal of Facilities Management 2(3) pp.244-257.

  • 13. European Commission 2001. Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility: Green Paper. Brussels.

  • 14. Galbreath J. 2009. Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Formal Strategic Planning and Firm Culture. British Journal of Management 21 pp.511-525.

  • 15. Gangone A.D. 2014. Responsabilitate sociala corporatista. Repere conceptuale. Abordari strategice. Particularitaţi culturale. BucureSti: Universitara Publishing House.

  • 16. Gangone A.D. and Ganescu M.C. 2014. Corporate social responsibility in emerging and developing economies in Central and Eastern Europe - a measurement model from the stakeholder theory perspective. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 27(1) pp.539-558.

  • 17. Ganescu C. 2012. Corporate social responsibility a strategy to create and consolidate sustainable businesses. Theoretical and Applied Economics 19(11) pp.91-106.

  • 18. Ganescu C. 2011. Cultura organizaţionala Si competitivitatea. BucureSti: Universitara Publishing House.

  • 19. Hemingway C.A. 2013. Corporate Social Entrepreneurship. Integrity Within. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • 20. Hillman A. and Keim G. 2001. Shareholder value stakeholder management and social issues: what´s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal 22(2) pp.125-139.

  • 21. Hofstede G. Hofstede G.J. and Minkov M. 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Revised and Expanded 3rd Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill USA.

  • 22. Hofstede G. 1996. Managementul structurilor multiculturale. Software-ul gândirii. BucureSti: Economica Publishing House.

  • 23. Hsu A. 2016. 2016 Environmental Performance Index. New Haven: Yale University. [on-line] Available at: [Accesed 15 January 2017].

  • 24. Jaakson K. Vadi M. and Tamm K. 2009. Organizational culture and CSR: an exploratory study of Estonian servce organizations. Social Responsibility Journal 5(1) pp.6-18.

  • 25. Jones T.M. Felps W. and Bigley G. 2007. Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Academy of Management Review 32 pp.137-155.

  • 26. Kotter J.P. and Heskett J.L. 1992. Corporate culture and performance. New York: Free Press.

  • 27. KPMG International 2016. 2016 Change Readiness Index. Oxford: Oxford Economics.

  • 28. Linnenluecke M.K. and Griffiths A. 2010. Corporate sustainability and organizational culture. Journal of World Business 45 pp.357-366.

  • 29. Maas K.E.H. Boons F.A.A. 2010. CSR as a strategic activity: value creation redistribution and integration. In: Louche C. Idowu S. Leal Filho W. (Eds.) Innovative CSR: From Risk Management to Value Creation. Greenleaf London pp. 154-172.

  • 30. Maignan I. and Ferrell O.C. 2004. Corporate social responsibility and marketing: an integrative framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 32(1) pp.3-19.

  • 31. Maon F. Lindgreen A. and Swaen V. 2010. Organizational Stages and Cultural Phases: A Critical Review and a Consolidative Model of Corporate Social Responsibility Development. International Journal of Management Reviews 12(1) pp.20-38.

  • 32. Obrad C. Petcu D. GhergheS V. and Suciu S. 2011. Responsabilitatea sociala a companiilor din România între percepţii Si realitate. Amfiteatru Economic XIII(29) pp.44-56.

  • 33. Olaru. M. Stoleriu. G. and Sandru I.M.D. 2011. Preocupari ale IMM-urilor din România privind responsabilitatea sociala în raport cu criteriile modelului european de excelenţa EFQM. Amfiteatru Economic XIII (29) pp.57-72.

  • 34. Schein E.H. 1999. Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.

  • 35. Schwab K. 2016. The Global Competitiveness Report 2016-2017. Full Data Edition [Pdf] Available at: . Accesed 10 January 2017.

  • 36. Siltaoja M.E. 2006. Value priorities as combining core factors between CSR and reputation - a qualitative study. Journal of Business Ethics 68(1) pp.91-111.

  • 37. Stanwick P.A. and Stanwick S.D. 1998. The Relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Size Financial Performance and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Business Ethics 17(2) pp.195-204.

  • 38. Strautmanis J. 2007. Acquiring Corporate Social Responsibility Approach Through Business Study Process. Riga: University of Latvia.

  • 39. Swanson D.L. 1999. Toward an integrative theory of business and society: a research strategy for corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 24 pp.506-521.

  • 40. Transparency International 2016. Corruption Perceptions Index 2016 Available at: .

  • 41. Trevino L. and Nelson K. 2007. Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk About How to Do It Right 4th edn. New York: Wiley.

  • 42. Ubius U. and Alas R. 2009. Organizational Culture Types as Predictors of Corporate Social Responsibility. Engineering Economics 1(61) pp.90-99.

  • 43. Wood. D.J. 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review 16 pp.691-718.

  • 44. Yu Y. and Choi Y. 2016. Stakeholder pressure and CSR adoption: the mediating role of organizational culture for Chinese companies. The Social Science Journal 53(2) pp.226-235.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 358 214 2
PDF Downloads 318 235 11