Corruption, Shadow Economy and Economic Growth: An Empirical Survey Across the European Union Countries

Open access


This study was carried out to empirically investigate the relationships between corruption and shadow economy among the European Union countries, over the period 2005-2014. Moreover, since one would expect corruption and shadow economy to be more common in poorer countries, this study was therefore carried out to determine how corruption and shadow economy affect economic development. The empirical findings of this study confirm a high and positive relationship between corruption and shadow economy, therefore a higher level of corruption involves a higher level of shadow economy. Regarding the influence of corruption and shadow economy on economic growth, a high and negative relationship was found. This means that increasing corruption and shadow economy negatively affects economic growth.

1. Achim, M. (2017), Corruption, income and business development, Journal for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development, 10(1), 85-100.

2. Achim, M., Borlea, N.S. (2015). Determinants of the European funds absorption 2007-2013 in European Union Member States, Proceeding of WEI International Academic Conference in Vienna, Austria, 174-188.

3. Beck, P., Maher, M. (1986). A comparison of bribery and bidding in thin markets. Economic Letters, 20 (1), 1-5.

4. Buehn, A., Schneider F. (2009). Corruption and the Shadow Economy: A Structural Equation Model Approach, IZA DP 4182.

5. Choi, J., Thum, M. (2005). Corruption and the Shadow Economy. International Economic Review, 46 (3), 817-836.

6. De Rosa, D., Gooroochurn, N., Gorg, H. (2010). Corruption and productivity: firmlevel evidence from the BEEPS Survey. Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank, 5348,1-41.

7. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. Quaterly Journal of Economics, 117 (1), 1-37.

8. Dreher, A., Schneider, F. (2006). Corruption and the Shadow economy. An empirical analysis. Working paper CREMA Gellerstrasse 24-CH-4052, 1-37.

9. Fjeldsta, O.H. (2003). Fighting fiscal corruption: Lessons from the Tanzania revenue authority. Public Administration and development, 23, 165-175.

10. Fjeldstam, O.H. (1996). Tax evasion and corruption in local governments in Tanzania: Alternative economic approaches. Working Paper 14, Chr. Michelsen Institute, 1-31..

11. Ghosh S., Neanidis K. C. (2011). Corruption, Fiscal Policy, and Growth: a Unified Approach. Brunel University London, Working Paper No. 11-20, 1-42.

12. Husted, B.W. (1999). Wealth, Culture, and Corruption, Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2), 339-59.

13. Ivanyna M., Moumouras, A., Rangazas, P. (2010). The culture of corruption, tax evasion, and optimal tax policy. Available at

14. Jiang, T., Nie, H. (2014). The stained China miracle: Corruption, regulation, and firm performance, Economics Letters, 123, 366-369.

15. Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D., Sleifer, A. (1997). The unofficial economy in transition. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 159-239.

16. Kaufman, D. (2010). Can Corruption Adversely Affect Public Finance in Industrialized Countries?, Brookings Institution Opinions April 19.

17. Kirchler, E. (2007). The Economic Psychology of Tax Behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

18. Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and Growth, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110 (3), 681-712.

19. Mocan, N. (2008). What determines corruption? International Evidence from Micro data, Economic Inquiry, 46(4), 493-510.

20. Orviska, M., Hudson, J. (2003). Tax evasion, civic duty and the law abiding citizen. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(1), 83-102.

21. Paldam, M., Gundlach, E. (2009). The transition of corruption: From poverty to honesty, Economic Letters, 103, 146-148.

22. Paldam, M. (2002). The big pattern of corruption: economics, culture and the see saw dynamics. European Journal of Political Economy, 18, 215-240.

23. Paldam, M. (2001). Corruption and religion. Adding to the economic model. Kyklos, 54, 383-414.

24. Sahakyan, N., Stiegert , KW. (2012). Corruption and Firm Performance, Eastern European Economics, 50(6), 5-27.

25. Schneider, F., Raczkowski, K., Mróz, B. (2015). Shadow economy and tax evasion in the EU, Journal of Money Laundering Control. 18(1), 34-51.

26. Schneider, F. (2013). Size and Development of the Shadow Economy of 31 European and 5 other OECD Countries from 2003 to 2013: A Further Decline, 1-7. Available at Accessed on November 2015.

27. Schneider, F. (2011). The Shadow Economy and Shadow Economy Labor Force: What Do We (Not) Know?, IZA Discussion paper, no. 5769, 1-66.

28. Schneider, F., Buehn, A., Montenegro, C.E. (2010). New Estimates for the Shadow Economies all over the World, International Economic Journal, 24(4), 443-461.

29. Schneider, F. (2005). Shadow economies of 145 countries all over the world: estimation results of the period 1999 to 2003, Discussion Paper Linz, 1-62.

30. Schneider, F., Klinglmair, R. (2004). Shadow economies around the world: what do we know? Universität Linz, Working Paper No. 0403, 1-57.

31. Shelak, B.J. (1997). The impact of the US underground activity. A note relating to the impact on state finances. Journal of Government Information, 24(2), 113-117.

32. Torgler, B., Schneider, F. (2007). The Impact of Tax Morale and Institutional Quality on the Shadow Economy. IZA Discussion Paper, 1-46.

33. Transparency International (2016). Available at: Accessed on February, 2016.

34. Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: a cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 399-457.

35. Virta, H. (2007). Corruption and Shadow Economy: Differences in the Relationship between Countries. Discussion papers, Helsinki Center of Economic Research, 171, 1-26.

36. Weber, A. (2005). How far Perceptions go, Transparency Brazil Working Paper. The World Bank, Washington DC.

37. World Bank Group (2016). Available at: < > Accessed on February, 2016.

38. World Bank (2009). Anticorruption. Washington, DC.

39. Zaman, G., Goschin, Z. (2015). Shadow economy and economic growth in Romania. Cons and pros. Procedia Economics and Finance, 22, 80 - 87.

Journal Information

Cited By


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 330 330 82
PDF Downloads 144 144 53