Mapping Deprivation in Rural Areas from Transylvania: Reflections on a Methodological Exercise

Open access

Abstract

The aim of the present paper is to present and critically discuss the potentialities and limits of using official data (collected and reported by state-institutions) in order to shed light on consequences of uneven development and measure area deprivation in present-day Romania. Our argumentation is based on a quantitative inquiry at the level of rural communes and small-towns from three counties located in the historical region of Transylvania. It presents the reasons for choosing certain statistical indicators, the construction of composite indexes and the profiles of localities according to their values. We explore the statistical correlations between our indexes and the poverty rates measured for 2002 (CASPIS, 2004), as well as the Local Human Development Index proposed by Sandu (2011) and revised by the World Bank (2014). Unlike other poverty-mapping inquiries, our goal was not to identify compact, segregated and severely impoverished settlements, but to measure the extent of material deprivation at the level of the entire administrative unit. In this way, we refrained from seeing poverty as the problem of a socially (and sometimes spatially) marginalized settlement, and instead defined poverty as a problem of the entire local community, that should be addressed by the local community as a whole. Our data reveals that, after controlling for poverty and local resources, the share of the Roma ethnic minority is a strong statistical predictor of registered unemployment, however, it does not correlate with the frequency of granting social assistance benefits.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Alkire S. (2002). Valuing Freedoms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Anghel R. (2009). Schimbare socială sau dezvoltare? Studiu de caz într-un oraș din România [Social change or development? A case study of a town in Romania]. In R. Anghel and I. Horvath (eds.): Sociologia migrației. Teorii și studii de caz românești [The sociology of migration. Theories and case studies from Romania]. Iași: Polirom pp. 249-268.

  • Atkinson T. C. Marlier E. Nolan B. (2002). Social Indicators: The EU and Social Inclusion Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • CASPIS - National Commission for Combating Poverty and Promoting Social Inclusion – (2004). Indicators of social exclusion/inclusion. Bucharest: CASPIS.

  • Eurostat (2011). Migrants in Europe. A statistical portrait of first and second generation migrants. Brussels: EU.

  • Fleck G. And Rughiniș C. (2008). Come closer. The inclusion and exclusion of the Roma. București: Human Dynamics.

  • Harvey D. (2003). The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Kasmir S. and Carbonella A. (2008): Dispossession and the New Anthropology of Labour. Critique of Anthropology 28(1):5-25.

  • Moisă F. Rostas I.A. Tarnovschi D. Stoian I. Rădulescu D. Andersen T.Ş. (2013) Raportul societăţii civile asupra implementării Strategiei Naţionale de Integrare a Romilor şi a Planului de Acţiune al Deceniului în România în 2012 [Civil society report on the National Strategy for the Integration of the Roma and the National Action Plan in Romania in 2012] http://www.romadecade.org/cms/upload/file/9270_file25_ro_civil-society-monitoring-report_ro.pdf (Accessed: 6.09.2013).

  • Petrovici N. (2013). Neoliberal Proletarization along the Urban-Rural Divide in Postsocialist Romania. Studia UBB Sociologia 58(2): 23-55.

  • Popescu L. (2006). Child Care Family and State in Post-Socialist Romania. In M. Mesner and G. Wolfgruber (eds): Politics of Reproduction at the Turn of the 21th Century; the Cases of Finland Portugal Romania Russia Austria and the US. Innsbruck: Studien Verlag pp. 109-127.

  • Rat C. (2009). The Impact of Minimum Income Guarantee Schemes in Central and Eastern Europe. In A. Cerami and P. Vanhuysee (eds.): Post-Communist Welfare Pathways: Theorizing Social Policy Transformations in CEE Basignstoke: Palgrave Macmillan pp. 164-181.

  • Rat C. (2011). Incluziune adversă. Prestații sociale și persistența sărăciei în rândul romilor din România [Adverse Inclusion. Social Transfers and the Persistence of Poverty among the Roma from Romania]. In S. Toma and L. Foszto (eds.): Spectrum. Cercetari sociale despre romi.[Spectrum. Social researches about the Roma]. Cluj-Napoca: Editura ISPMN and Criterion pp. 159-180.

  • Rat C. (2013). Bare peripheries. State retrenchment and population profiling in segregated Roma settlements from Romania. Studia UBB Sociologia 58(2): 155-175.

  • Sandu D. (2005). Comunitățile de romi din România. O hartă a sărăciei comunitare prin sondajul PROROMI. [Roma communities in Romania. A community-poverty map based on the PROROMI survey]. Bucharest: The World Bank. http://www.anr.gov.ro/docs/statistici/PROROMI__Comunitatile_de_Romi_din_Romania_187.pdf (01.09.2015).

  • Sandu D.(2010). Home orientation in transnational spaces of Romanian migration. Studia UBB Sociologia 55(2):15-37.

  • Sandu D. (2011). Disparități sociale în dezvoltarea și în politica regională din România International Review of Social Research 1(1): 1-30.

  • Sandu D.(2013). Romanian migration in the frame of the East-West migration system: understanding its near future. Workshop on labour market liberalization 11th of October 2013 The Hague. https://sites.google.com/site/dumitrusandu/. (2.04.2014).

  • Sen A. (1983). Poor relatively speaking. Oxford Economic Papers New Series 35(2): 153-169.

  • Sen A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Singh G. (2003). Area deprivation and widening inequalities in US mortality 1969-1998. American Journal of Public Health 93(7):1137-43.

  • Somers M. (2005): Let them Eat Social Capital: Socializing the Market versus Marketizing the Social. Thesis Eleven 81(1): 5-19.

  • Vincze E. (2013). Socio-spatial marginality of the Roma as a form of intersectional injustice. Studia UBB Sociologia 58(2): 217-243.

  • Vincze E. and Hossu I. (eds.) (2014). Marginalizarea socio-teritorială a comunităților de romi în România [The social and territorial marginalization of Roma communities in Romania]. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Fundației pentru Studii Europene.

  • United Nations Development Programme/World Bank/European Commission – Fundamental Rights Agency (2011): The Situation of the Roma in 11 Member Stateshttp://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/2099-FRA-2012-Roma-at-a-glance_EN.pdf (20.12.2015).

  • United Nations Development Programme – UNDP (2013): Integrated Household Surveys among Roma Populations. Roma Inclusion Working Papers UNDP http://www.eurasia.undp.org/content/rbec/en/home/library/roma/roma-household-survey-methodology.html (20.12.2015).

  • The World Bank (2009): Report on the Law on the Minimum Income Guarantee in Romania 2002-2009. Washington: The World Bank.

  • The World Bank (2014): Competitive Cities: Reshaping the Economic Geography of Romania. Washington: World Bank. http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2014/02/20/000456286_20140220151016/Rendered/PDF/843240v10Full00s0Box382123B00OUO070.pdf (15.10.2015).

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.04

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.100
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.000

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 171 99 1
PDF Downloads 108 75 2