Productivity of Czech logistic firms: quality orientation, entrants and multinationals

Open access


The paper analyses logistics industry in Czech Republic and analyzes clusters and groups of one hundred companies that were active in the market in 2014. Analysis is based on the economic theory of endogenous growth and technological spillovers of multinational firms. They have the know-how and technology, which makes them more productive than local firms which tries to catch up the leaders and try to get as much knowledge as possible. This paper contributes to this theory. Key findings for this transitional economy is that quality certification is not beneficial for labor productivity and earnings, there are differences among multinational firms in terms of output efficiency and they are on average more productive than local firms, older firms are less productive than younger, but entrants are not more profitable than older firms.

Acs, Z. J. et al. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics. 41(4), 15-30. DOI:

Cantwell, J. & Piscitello, L. (2002). The location of technological activities of MNCs in European regions: The role of spillovers and local competencies. Journal of International Management. 8(1), 69-96. DOI: 10.1016/S1075-4253(01)00056-4.

Dopfer, K. (2005). The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gotzamani, K., Longinidis, P. & Vouzas, F. (2010). The logistics services outsourcing dilemma: quality management and financial performance perspectives. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 15(6), 438-453. DOI:

Greasley, D. & Oxley, L. (2011). Economics and History: Surveys in Cliometrics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Gregory, N. F. (2009). Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change. Research Policy. 38(5), 700-709. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.004.

Griliches, Z. (1992). The Search for R&D Spillovers. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 94(-), 29-47. DOI: 10.2307/3440244.

Javorcik, B. S. (2004). Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers Through Backward Linkages. The American Economic Review. 94(3), 605-627. DOI: 10.1257/0002828041464605.

Keller, W. & Yeaple, S. R. (2009). Multinational Enterprises, International Trade, and Productivity Growth: Firm-Level Evidence from the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics. 91(4), 821-831. DOI: 10.3386/w9504.

Klein, R. & Rai, A. (2009). Interfirm Strategic Information Flows in Logistics Supply Chain Relationships. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 33(4), 735-762.

Levine, D. I. & Toffel, M. W. (2010). Quality Management and Job Quality: How the ISO 9001 Standard for Quality Management Systems Affects Employees and Employers. Management Science. 56(-), 978-996. DOI:

Liebowitz S. J. & Magolis, S. E. (1995). Path Dependence, Lock-in, and History. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization. 1(11), 205-226. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1706450.

Lucas, R. J. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics. 22(1988), 3-42.

Memedovic, O. et al. (2008). Fuelling the global value chains: what role for logistics capabilities? International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development. 1(3), 353-374. DOI: 10.1504/IJTLID.2008.019978.

Min, H. & Jong, S. J. (2006). Benchmarking the operational efficiency of third party logistics providers using data envelopment analysis. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 11(3), 259-265. DOI:

Munuzuri, J. et al. (2013). ISO 9001 and standardised logistics management: an empirical analysis in Spanish small and medium-sized enterprises. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. 24(3-4), 479-495. DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2012.756746

Nelson, R. R. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Park, H. G. & Lee, Y. J. (2015). The Efficiency and Productivity Analysis of Large Logistics Providers Services in Korea. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics. 31(4), 469-476. DOI:

Prajogo, D. & Olhager, J. (2012). Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration. International Journal of Production Economics. 135(1), 514-522. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.09.001.

Qureshi, M. N., Kumar, D. & Kumar, P. (2007). Modeling the logistics outsourcing relationship variables to enhance shippers’ productivity and competitiveness in logistical supply chain. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 56(8), 689-714. DOI: 10.1108/17410400710833001.

Ramsey, J. B. (1969). Tests for Specification Errors in Classical Linear Least-Squares Regression Analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 31(2), 350-371.

Stabler, A. (1996). Productivity, Performance Measurement and Management in Logistics. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. 8(2), 46-63. DOI:

Van Beveren, I. (2012). Total factor productivity estimation: a practical review. Journal of Economic Surveys. 26(1), 98-128. DOI: DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00631.x.

Vochozka, M., Straková, J. & Váchal, J. (2015). Model to predict survival of transportation and shipping companies. Nase More. 62(-), 109-113. DOI: 10.17818/NM/2015/SI4.

Vokoun, M. (2014). Multinationals in a Small Open Economy - The Case of the Czech Republic (1997-2010). International Journal of Business and Management Studies. 3(1), 299-314.

Vokoun, M. (2015). Innovation behaviour of firms in a small open economy: the case of the Czech manufacturing industry. Empirica. 43(1), 111-139. DOI:

Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual comparison by ranking methods. Biometrics. 1(6), 80-83. DOI: 10.2307/3001968.

Studia Commercialia Bratislavensia

The Journal of University of Economics in Bratislava

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 99 99 12
PDF Downloads 47 47 7