Using of Multicriteria Method for Choosing the Best Alternative of the Heating Power Plant

Open access

Abstract

The paper presents construction of heating system in Trebišov town in alternative solution and its environmental impact assessment (EIA). Choosing the best alternative consider zero variant (if no activity is done - present state of the environment) and another two alternatives assessment using the method of the total indicator of environmental quality. Nine selected criteria were divided into four groups according to their character - economic, technical, ecological and social. Based on evaluation of the construction of biomass-fired power plant seems to be the best solution of heating system for Trebišov town.

[1] Ministry of economy of the SR. 1997. Resolution of the Government No. 684/97, 30 December 1997, Bratislava: Ministry of Economy of the SR.

[2] Ministry of Economy of the SR. 2000. National renewable energy and action plan. Bratislava: Ministry of Economy of the SR, 1-76.

[3] Ministry of Economy of the SR. 2002. Conception of energy. Bratislava: Ministry of Economy.

[4] Ministry of Economy of the SR and Ministry of Agriculture of the SR. 2004. Report on progress in the development of renewable energy sources, including the setting of national indicative targets for the use of renewable energy sources (RES). Bratislava: Ministry of Economy, p. 23.

[5] Štroffeková, S. 2011. Energy and its environmental impact assessment in the Slovak Republic in 2011. The indicator sectoral report. (In Slovak)

[6] Ministry of Economy of the SR. 2007. Concept of Energy Effectiveness, Bratislava: Ministry of Economy.

[7] Ministry of Agriculture of the SR. 2007. Energy efficiency action plan for the years 2008 to 2010. Bratislava: Ministry of Agriculture.

[8] Slovak Innovation and Energy Agency . Sustainable development and the impact of energy on the environment. Annex. 6, pages 1-5, available on (in Slovak): https://www.siea.sk/materials/files/poradenstvo/legislativa/energ_politika/enp_priloha_6.pdf

[9] Act 24/2006 Coll. on environmental impact assessment and on amendments and supplements

[10] Ivaň, M. 2011. LAND - Servis. 2011. Recovery facilities category "O" Others, recovery of construction debris, paper, plastics, wood, Operation Trebišov, October 2011. available on (in Slovak): http://www.enviroportal.sk/sk_SK/eia/detail/ing-michal-ivan-land-servis-trebisovzariadenie-na-zhodnocovanie-odpad

[11] Trebišovská energetická, s.r.o, Central energy sources TREBIŠOV (in Slovak)

[12] Banik and son, s.r.o., Differences between traditional and condensing boilers. available on (in Slovak): http://www.banik.sk/rozdiely-medzi-klasickym-a-kondenzacnym-kotlom/

[13] Majerník, M., Húsková, V., Bosák, M., Chovancová, J. 2008. Methodology of the environmental impact assessment, Košice: TUKE, p. 212.

[14] Bašková, R. 2004. Modeling of construction processes. Mathematico Economy Methods - Part I. Linear optimization and network analysis. Košice: TUKE. ISBN 80-8073-188-8.

[15] Kampf, R. 2003. Estimated method for weight criteria, Scientific paper of the University of Pardubice, The Jan Perner Transport faculty, Series B, vol. 9, pp. 255-261.

[16] Olejník, A. 2016. Environmental impact assessment of selected structure, Diploma thesis, Košice: TUKE, p. 71.

Selected Scientific Papers - Journal of Civil Engineering

The Journal of Technical University of Kosice

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 123 122 11
PDF Downloads 62 62 6