Multimodal Metaphors and Advertising: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Use of Behavioural Multimodal Metaphors

Open access

Summary

The main purpose of this paper is to analyze how culture is embedded in the way viewers from different language backgrounds conceptualize and interpret the same multimodal metaphors. Therefore, interaction between metaphor and culture is hence a crucial aspect of research in this study. Following Lakoff and Johnson’s (1980) and Forceville’s (1996, 2009) approaches, this paper examines how a comparative study undertaken from a cross-cultural perspective can shed light on how culture is an influential factor that can trigger changes in interpretations and reactions in the viewers. Data for this research were gathered with the help of 240 participants taken from 8 different language backgrounds. The subjects of this study were supplied with a questionnaire which consisted of three multimodal metaphors and 8 questions. In particular, I want to focus on the following research questions: (1) Which figurative B-term do different cultures conceptualize in a multimodal metaphor? (2) How aggressive are these multimodal metaphors considered by the participants of the study? On the basis of the results of this research, it can be concluded that not only the cultural background but also the personal has some influence on the way respondents interpret multimodal metaphors. The reactions identified in the responses of the subjects are influenced by different factors: religion, personal and societal experiences, beliefs, etc.

Bounegru, L., &Forceville, C. (2011): Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Journal of Visual Communication, 10, 209–229.

Carroll, N. (1994). Visual Metapho’. In J. Hintikka (ed.), Aspects of Metaphor (pp. 189–218).Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Cook, G. (2001). The Discourse of Advertising (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Croft, W. (1993). The Role of Domains in the Interpretation of Metaphors and Metonymies, Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 335–370.

Dirven, R. (2009). Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualization. In C. Forceville, &E. Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal Metaphor (pp. 19–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Esposito, J. A. (2011). Critical approach to the analysis of advertisements. The Linguistics Journal, 5(1), 197–219.

Forceville, C. (1994). Pictorial Metaphor in Advertisements. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9(1), 1–29.

Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. New York: Routledge.

Forceville, C. (2002a). Further thoughts on delimitating pictorial metaphor. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum, 6, 213–27.

Forceville, C. (2006). Non - verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, &F. Ruiz de Mendoza (ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives (pp. 379–402).Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Forceville, C. (2008). Metaphor in Pictures and Multimodal Representations. In R. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and thought (pp. 462–482). New York: Cambridge University.

Forceville, C. (2009). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. Forceville &E. Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal Metaphor (pp. 19–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Forceville, C. &Urios-Aparisi, E. (2009). Introduction. In C. J. Forceville &E. Urios-Aparisi (ed.), Applications of Cognitive Linguistics. Multimodal Metaphor (pp. 3–17).Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Gibbs, R. (1994). The Poetics of the Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gibbs, R. W. (1999). Taking Metaphor out of Our Heads and Putting it into the Cultural World. In R. Gibbs and G. Steen, Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 145–166). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lakoff, G. (1991). Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System Used to justify War in the Gulf. Distributed via electronic bulletin boards. Reprinted in B.Hallet (ed.), Engulfed in War: Just War and the Persian Gulf (pp. 95–111). Honolulu: Matsunaga Institute for Peace.

Lakoff, G. (1993). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lakoff, G. &Mark, J. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. &Turner, M. (1989). More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Shore, B. (1996). Culture in Mind: Cognition, Culture, and the Problem of Meaning. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Forceville, C. (2009). A Course in Pictorial and Multimodal Metaphor.

Sustainable Multilingualism

Darnioji daugiakalbyste

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 214 214 31
PDF Downloads 133 133 17