Formulacity in ESP Teaching: A Case of Doing a Balancing Act Between Form and Meaning

Open access


Grammar teaching has never belonged to mainstream ESP teaching/ learning practices. However, this apparent lack of concern with grammar in ESP materials runs counter to both subjective and objective needs of ESP learners. The first part of the paper presents students′ views on deficiencies of coursebooks for teaching English for Medical Purposes (EMP) as well as author’s reflective thinking on the needs of medical undergraduates of vocational schools in Poland. It is suggested that some of the deficiencies of the materials might be remedied and the students′ needs better taken care of if explicit teaching of formulaic language is introduced into ESP classroom environment. It is hypothesized that explicit teaching of formulaic language may stimulate grammar development in the long term and foster communicative competence of ESP learners in the short term. Therefore, the second part of the paper proposes pedagogically relavant classification of medical formulaic sequences motivated by the lexicogrammatical features of Medical English. The third part of the paper shows in what way the proposed classification of formulaic sequences might help teachers of medical English design tasks that are conducive to the development of formulaic competence of students of English for Medical Purposes.

Bley-Vroman, R. 1989. ‘The logical problemof foreign language learning’. Linguistic Analysis 20: 3-49.

Basturkmen, H. 2008. Ideas and Options in English for Specific Purposes. New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Bentley, K. 2010. The TKT Course. CLIL Module. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Conklin, K., Schmitt, N. 2008. ‘Formulaic Sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers?’ Applied Linguistics: 29/1 72/89. Oxford University Press.

Gozdawa-Gołębiowski, R. 2008. Gramar and Formulacity in Foreign Language Teaching. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM Glottodidactica Vol. XXXIV.

Harmer, J. 2012. Teacher Knowledge. Core Concepts in English Laguage Teaching. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

Jones, M., Durrant, Ph. 2008.What can a corpus tell us about vocabulary teaching materials? In A. O’Keeffe, M. McCarthy (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. (387-400) New York: The Taylor & Francis Group.

Lewis, M. 1993. Lexical Approach. Language Teaching Publications.

Lewis, M. 2000. Teaching Collocation. Further Developments in Lexical Approach. London: LTP Teacher Training.

Pavičić Takač, V. 2008. Vocabulary Learning Strategies and Foreign Language Acquistion. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.

Sinclair, J. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation, Oxford University Press.

Thornbury, S. 2008. Uncovering Grammar. Oxford: Macmillan Education.

Wray, A., Perkins, M. 2000. ‘The functions of formulaic language: an integrated model’. Language & Communication Vol. 20 (1): 1-28.

Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wray, A. 2008. Formulaic Language: Pushing the Boundaries. Oxford University Press.

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric

The Journal of University of Bialystok

Journal Information

Cite Score 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.138
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.358

Cited By


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 187 153 11
PDF Downloads 101 90 5