Predictability of smoking onset among Romanian adolescents

Open access

Abstract

Objectives: Research identifying reliable and country-specific predictors of smoking is needed in order to develop effective adolescent smoking prevention programmes. The objective of this study was to assess the cognitive and socio-demographic factors associated with smoking onset among Romanian teenagers, using both cross-sectional and longitudinal data.

Methods: The data were obtained from a two-wave, one-year longitudinal study carried out among 316 senior high school non-smokers from Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Questionnaires assessed smoking behaviour, attitudes, social influence, self-efficacy and intention regarding smoking (motivational variables) as well as different sociodemographic features.

Results: The cross-sectional analyses showed that socio-demographics and motivational variables were strongly associated with smoking behaviour; the explained variance was 76%. The longitudinal analyses revealed that four variables explained 33% of the variance in change of status from non-smoking to regular smoking over a period of one year. Regular smoking onset after one year was predicted by baseline low self-efficacy in refraining from smoking in different situations, having more smoking friends and playing truant from school. Having a brother was a protective factor.

Conclusion: The results suggest that smoking prevention programmes in Romania should strengthen self-efficacy beliefs and resistance against peer modelling and help Romanian young people to develop skills and action plans to cope with pressure to smoke and challenging situations.

1. World Health Organization. WHO European tobacco control raport, 2007. Available June 2008 at: http://www.euro.who.int/Document/E89842.pdf.

2. Bartholomew L, Parcel G, Kok G. Intervention mapping: a process for developing theory and evidence based health education programs. Health Educ Behav 1998; 25: 545-63.

3. Ausems M. Smoking prevention: comparing in school, tailored out of school and boosters interventions: dissertation. Maastricht, 2003.

4. De Vries H, Mudde AN, Leijs I, Charlton A, Vartiainen E, Vartiainen E et al. The European Smoking prevention Framework Approach (ESFA): an example of integral prevention. Health Educ Res 2003; 18: 611-26.

5. De Vries H, Mudde AN, Kremers S, Wetzels J, Uiters E, Ariza C et al. The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (ESFA): short-term effects. Health Educ Res 2003; 18: 649-63.

6. De Vries H, Backbier E, Kok G, Dijkstra M. The impact of social influences in the context of attitude, self-efficacy, intention and previous behaviour as predictors of smoking onset. J Appl Soc Psychol 1995; 25: 237-57.

7. De Vries H, Dijk F, Wetzels J, Mudde A, Kremers S, Ariza C et al. The European Smoking prevention Framework Approach (ESFA): effects after 24 and 30 months. Health Educ Res 2006; 2: 116-32.

8. Dijkstra M, Mesters I, De Vries H, Van Breukelen G, Parcel GS. Effectiveness of a social influence approach and boosters to smoking prevention. Health Educ Res 1999; 14: 791-802.

9. Holm K, Kremers S, De Vries H. Why do Danish adolescents take up smoking? Eur J Public Health 2003; 13: 67-74.

10. Vitoria PD, Kremers SP, Mudde AN, Pais-Clemente M, De Vries H. Psychosocial factors related with smoking behaviour in Portuguese adolescents. Eur J Cancer Prev 2006; 15: 531-40.

11. Bandura A. Social learning theory. New York: Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, 1997.

12. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1975.

13. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Prom 1997; 12: 38-48.

14. Tyas LS, Pederson L. Psychosocial factors related to adolescent smoking: a critical review of the literature. Tob Control 1998; 7: 409-20.

15. US Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing tobacco use among young people: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: USDHHS, 1994.

16. Nebot M, Tomas Z, Ariza C, Valmayor S, López MJ, Juárez O. Factors associated with smoking onset: 3-year cohort study of schoolchildren. Archivos de Bronconeumologia 2004; 40: 495-501.

17. Hoving C, Reubsaet A, De Vries H. Predictors of smoking stage transitions for adolescent boys and girls. Prev Med 2007; 44: 485-9.

18. Conrad KM, Flay BR, Hill D. Why children start smoking cigarettes: predictors of onset. Bri J Addict 1992; 87: 1711-24.

19. Engels RCME, Knibbe RA, Drop MJ. Predictability of smoking in adolescence: between optimism and pessimism. Addiction 1999; 94: 115-24.

20. Ausems M, Mesters I, Van Breukelen G, De Vries H, Brug J, Steenhuis I, Van Assema P. Short-term effects of a randomized computer-based out-of-school smoking prevention trial aimed at elementary schoolchildren. Prev Med 2002; 34: 581-9.

21. National Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2002. Available January 2006 at: http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/questionnaires/pdf-ques/2002brfss.pdf.

22. Forrester K, Biglan A, Severson HH, Smolkowski K. Predictors of smoking onset over two years. Nicotine Tob Res 2007; 9: 1259-67.

23. De Vries H, Van’t Riet J, Panday S, Reubsaet A. Access point analysis in smoking and nonsmoking adolescents: findings from the European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach study. Eur J Cancer Prev 2007; 16: 257-65.

24. Lotrean LM, Ionut C, Mesters I, De Vries H. Factors associated with smoking among Romanian senior high school students. J Res Social Interv 2009; 25: 83-100.

25. White HR, Violette NM, Metzger L, Stouthamer-Loeber M. Adolescent risk factors for late-onset smoking among African American young men. Nicotine Tob Res 2007; 9: 153-61.

26. Chang FC, Lee CM, Lai HR, Chiang JT, Lee PH, Chen WJ. Social influences and self-efficacy as predictors of youth smoking initiation and cessation: a 3-year longitudinal study of vocational high school students in Taiwan. Addiction 2006; 101: 1645-55.

27. Van Den Bree MBV, Whitmer MD, Pickworth WB. Predictors of smoking development in a population-based sample of adolescents: a prospective study. J Adolesc Health 2004; 35: 172-81.

28. De Vries H, Engels R, Kremers S, Wetzels J, Mudde, A. Parents and friends’ smoking status as predictors of smoking onset: findings from six European countries. Health Educ Res 2003; 18: 627-36.

29. Piperakis SM, Garagouni-Araiou F, Argyracouli E. A survey on smoking habits and attitudes among adolescents in Greece. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2008; 20: 63-71.

30. Wang MQ, Fitzhugh EC, Green BL, Turner LW, Eddy JM, Westerfield RC. Prospective social psychological factors of adolescent smoking progression. J Adolesc Health 1999; 24: 2-9.

31. Engels RCME, Knibbe RA, Drop MJ, De Haan YT. Homogeneity of cigarette smoking within peer groups: influence or selection? Health Educ Behav 1997; 24: 801-11.

32. Kremers SPJ, Mudde AN, De Vries NK, Brug J, De Vries H. Unplanned smoking initiation: new insights and implications for interventions. Patient Educ Couns 2004; 55: 345-52.

33. Van De Ven MO, Engels RC, Otten R, Van Den Eijnden RJ. A longitudinal test of the theory of planned behavior predicting smoking onset among asthmatic and non-asthmatic adolescents. J Behav Med 2007; 30: 435-45.

34. Wakefield M, Kloska D, O’Malley P, Johnston L, Chaloupka F, Pierce J, Giovino G, Ruel E, Flay B. The role of smoking intentions in predicting future smoking among youth: findings from monitoring the future data. Addiction 2004; 99: 91422.

35. Milton B, Cook PA, Dugdill L. Why do primary school children smoke?: a longitudinal analysis of predictors of smoking uptake during pre-adolescence. Public Health 2004; 118: 24755.

36. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organiz Beh Human Decis Process 1991; 50: 179-211.

37. Center for Health Policies and Services. Fumatul si sanatatea publica in Romania: cunostintele, atitudinile si comportamentul legate de fumat in randul populatiei generale (Smoking and public health in Romania. Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding tobacco use among general population in Romania). Bucharest: The Center, 2004.

38. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Global youth tobacco survey, 2004. Available February 2006 at: http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/global/GYTS/factsheets/2004/pdf/Romania_factsheet2004.

39. Trofor A, Loghin CR. Fumatul de la obicei la boala (Smoking from habit to disease). Iasi: Tehnopress, 2004.

40. The Official Gazette of Romania no. 1067. Law no 147/ 2004, Romania.

41. Lotrean LM, Ionut C, de Vries H. Tobacco use among Romanian youth. Salud Publica Mex 2006; 48: 107-12.

42. Pederson LL, Lefcoe NM. Short- and long-term prediction of self reported cigarette smoking in a cohort of late adolescents: report of an 8-year follow-up of public school students. Prev Med 1987; 16: 432-47.

43. Godin G, Kok G. The theory of planned behavior: a review of its applications to health-related behaviors. Am J Health Prom 1996; 11: 87-98.

44. Armitage CJ, Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Bri J Soc Psychol 2001; 40: 471-99.

45. Rosenthal R. How are we doing in soft psychology? Am Psychologist 1990; 45: 775-7.

46. Kremers SPJ, Mudde AN, De Vries H. Model of Unplanned Smoking Initiation of Children and Adolescents (MUSICA): an integrated stage model of smoking behavior. Prev Med 2004; 38: 643-51.

47. Murray D, Perry C, Griffin G, Harty K, Jacobs D, Schmidt L, Daly K, Pallonen U. Results from a statewide approach to adolescent tobacco use prevention. Prev Med 1992; 21: 449-72.

48. Dolcini MM, Adler NE, Ginsberg D. Factors influencing agreement between self-reports and biological measures of smoking among adolescents. J Res Adolescence1996; 6: 515-42.

Slovenian Journal of Public Health

The Journal of National Institute of Public Health

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.620
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.488



CiteScore 2017: 0.33

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.147
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.429

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 322 292 26
PDF Downloads 86 83 8