Comprehension of Spatial Metaphors After Right Hemisphere Stroke: A Case Report

Open access


Studying how spatial information interacts with figurative language processing in right-hemisphere (RH) stroke patients is a relatively neglected area of research. The goal of the present case study was to establish whether an ischemic lesion in the right temporo-parietal region causing spatial neglect would affect comprehension of sentence-level spatial metaphors, since some evidence indicates the crucial role of the RH in metaphor processing. The patient under study showed some degree of cognitive impairment (e.g., in spatial and verbal working memory, executive control, visuo-spatial matching skills). However, his comprehension of spatial metaphors was preserved. This case illustrates that RH damage does not necessarily affect comprehension of sentence-level spatial metaphors.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Kerbler G.M. Nedelska Z. Fripp J. Laczo J.Vyhnalek M. Lisy J. et al. (2015). Basal forebrain atrophy contributes to allocentric navigation impairment in Alzheimer’s disease patients. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 7 185.

  • 2. Mesulam M.M. (1981). A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Ann. Neurol. 10 309-325.

  • 3. Mesulam M.M. (1999). Spatial attention and neglect: parietal frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 354 1325-1346.

  • 4. Zaehle T. Jordan K. Wuestenberg T. Baudewig J. Dechent P. & Mast F.W. (2007). The neural basis of the egocentric and allocentric spatial frame reference. Brain Research 1137 92-103.

  • 5. Chatterjee A. (2001). Language and space: some interactions. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 5 55-61.

  • 6. Chatterjee A. (2008). The neural organization of spatial thought and language. Sem. Speech Lang. 29 226-238.

  • 7. Wu D.H. S. Waller & A. Chatterjee. (2007). The functional neuroanatomy of thematic role and locative relational knowledge. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19 1542-55.

  • 8. Wallentin M. Ostergaard S. Lund E.T. Ostergaard S. & Roepstorff A. (2005). Concrete spatial language: see what I mean? Brain & Language 92 221-233.

  • 9. Bottini G. Corcoran R. Sterzi R. Paulesu E. Schenone P Scarpa R.S. et al. (1994). The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language. Brain 117 1241-1253.

  • 10. Schmidt G.L. DeBuse C.J. & Seger C.A. (2007). Right hemisphere metaphor processing? Characterizing the lateralization of semantic processes. Brain & Language 100 127-141.

  • 11. Rapp A.M. Leube D.T. Erb M. Grodd W. & Kircher T.T.J. (2007). Laterality in metaphor processing: lack of evidence from functional magnetic responance imaging for the right heipshere theorey. Brain & Language 100 142-149.

  • 12. Winner E. & Gardner H. (1977). The comprehension of metaphors in brain damaged patients. Brain 100 717-729.

  • 13. Van Lancker D.R. & Kempler D. (1987). Comprehension of familiar phrases by left-but not by righthemisphere damaged patients. Brain & Language 32 265-277.

  • 14. Ianni R.G. Cardillo E.R. McQuire M. & Chatterjee A. (2014). Flying under the radar: figurative language impairments in focal lesion patients. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8 871.

  • 15. Casasanto D. & Bottini R. (2013). Spatial language and abstract concepts. WIREs Cognitive Science 5 139-149.

  • 16. Vuković M. (2011). Afaziologija. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju.

  • 17. Nasreddine Z. Phillips N.A. Bédirian V. Charbonneau S. Whitehead V. Collin I. Cummings J.L. & Chertkow H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 53(4) 659-699.

  • 18. MacDonald M.C. Almor A. HendersonV.W. Kempler D. & Andersenet E.S. (2001). Assessing Working Memory and Language Comprehension in Alzheimer’s Disease. Brain & Language 78 17–42.

  • 19. Raven J. C. Court J. H. & Raven J. (1990). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales—section 2: Coloured progressive matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.

  • 20. Sieroff E. (2015). Acquired spatial dyslexia. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. DOI: 10.1016/

  • 21. Baldo J.V. Bunge S.A. Wilson S.M. & Dronkers N.F. (2010). Is relational reasoning dependent on language? A voxel-based symptom mapping study. Brain & Language 113 59-64.

  • 22. Crawford J.R. & Howell D.C. (1998). Comparing an individual’s test score against norms derived from small samples. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 12 482-486.

  • 23. Driver J. & Husain M. (2002). The role of spatial working memory deficits in [pathological search by neglect patients. In: Karanth H.O. Milner D. & Vallar G. (Eds.) The cognitive and neural bases of spatial neglect. Oxford: Oxford University Press (pp. 351-362).

  • 24. Halligan P.W. (1999). Hemianopia and visual neglect: a question of balance. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 67 561–566.

  • 25. Ting D.S. Pollock A. Dutton G.N. Doubal F.N. Thompson M. Dhillon B. et al. (2011) Visual neglect following stroke: current concepts and future focus. Surv Ophthalmol 56 114-134.

  • 26. Gallagher M. Wilkinson D.T. & Sakel M. (2013) Hemispatial neglect: clinical features assessment and treatment. British Journal of Neuroscience Nursing 9 273-277.

  • 27. Karnath H.O. Rennig J. Johannsen L. & Rorden C. (2011). The anatomy underlying acute vs. chronic spatial neglect: a longitudinal study. Brain 134 903-912.

  • 28. Makris N. Kennedy D.N. McInerney S. Sorensen G.A. Wang R. Caviness V.S. et al. (2005). Segmentation of Subcomponents within the Superior Longitudinal Fascicle in Humans: A Quantitative In Vivo DTMRI Study. Cerebral Cortex 15:854—869.

  • 29. Thiebaut de Schotten M. Urbanski M. Duffau H. Vollem E. Levym R. et al. (2005). Direct evidence for a parietal-frontal pathway subserving spatial awareness in humans. Science 309 2226–2228.

  • 30. Tanaka S. Honda M. & Sadato N. (2005). Modalityspecific cognitive function of medial and lateral human Brodmann area 6. The Journal of Neuroscience 25 496-501.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.13

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.118
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.079

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 201 125 3
PDF Downloads 115 76 1