Localisation and Types of Cosmetic Medical Treatments - Correlation with Demographic Characteristics of Serbian Clients

Open access


There is a growing number of cosmetic medical treatments in the Balkan region. Yet, this trend has not been closely observed in terms of the correlation between procedure characteristics and clients’ sociocultural and psychological characteristics.

The aim of this cross-sectional/retrospective research is to establish the correlation of types of cosmetic procedures with basic sociodemographic characteristics of clients in Serbia. Each of 144 study subjects underwent a cosmetic treatment (320 in total) within the first three months of 2014, while the study was being conducted. The sample included 5 male and 139 female subjects, with the age range of 17-71 (38.87±10.722).

Peaks of interventions have been detected in subjects aged 31-35 and 36-40; more frequently those were individuals with a higher level of education and their motive most commonly was of aesthetic nature. The majority of the subjects (44.44%) underwent only one intervention, while the average number of interventions per subject within the period of three months was 2.21±1.40. Face interventions were considerably higher in number than others, with a rising trend with age. The number of procedures in the area of the abdomen, breasts and thighs, rose with the increase of a body mass index. The most popular treatments included removal of stretch marks and fillers, mesotherapy and botulinum toxin.

Due to ever-growing sociocultural pressure and a modern concept of life, women often decide on cosmetic therapy at the first sign of ageing and hormonal changes, with a downward age trend especially with respect to minimally invasive procedures, as well as the most visible body parts, the face in the first place.

1. Rubeša, G., Tic-Bačić, T., Sveško-Visentin, H. & Bačić, G. (2011). The Influence of Aesthetic Surgery on the Profile of Emotion. Collegium Antropologicum, 35, Suppl. 2, 51-55.

2. Freedman, R. (1988). Bodylove: Learning to like our looks -- and ourselves. New York: Harper & Row.

3. van den Berg, P., Paxton, S.J., Keery, H., Wall, M., Guo, J. & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2007). Body dissatisfaction and body comparison with media images in males and females. Body Image, 4, 257-268. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.04.003

4. Sarwer, D.B. & Crerand, C.E. (2004). Body image and cosmetic medical treatments. Body Image, 1, 99-111. DOI: 10.1016/S1740-1445(03)00003-2

5. Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Bridges, S. & Furnham, A. (2009). Acceptance of cosmetic surgery: Personality and individual difference predictors. Body Image, 6, 7-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.09.004

6. ASPS (2013). 2013 Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. US: The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

7. ISAPS (2013). International Survey on Aesthetic/ Cosmetic Procedures Performed in 2013. New York: The International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Retrieved January 25, 2015, from http://www.isaps.org

8. Sarwer, D.B., Wadden, T.A., Pertschuk, M.J. & Whitaker, L.A. (1998). The psychology of cosmetic surgery: a review and reconception. Clinical Psychology Review, 18 (1), 1-22. DOI: 10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00047-0

9. Malick, F., Howard, J. & Koo, J. (2008). Understanding the psyhology of cosmetic patients. Dermatologic therapy, 21, 47-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8019.2008.00169.x

10. Honigman, R.J., Jackson, A.C. & Dowling, N.A. (2011). The PreFACE: A Preoperative Psychosocial Screen for Elective Facial Cosmetic Surgery and Cosmetic Dentistry Patients. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 66 (1), 16-23. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181d50e54

11. Hodgkinson, D.J. (2005). Identifying the Body-Dismorphic Patient in Aesthetic Surgery. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 29 (6), 503-509. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-005-5033-6

12. Markey, C.N. & Markey, P.M. (2010). A correlational and experimental examination of reality television viewing and interest in cosmetic surgery. Body Image, 7, 165-171. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.10.006

13. Swami, V., Arteche, A., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Furnham, A., Stieger, S., Haubner, T., et al. (2008). Looking good: Factors affecting the likelihood of having cosmetic surgery. European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 30, 211-218. DOI: 10.1007/s00238-007-0185-z

14. ASPS (2009). Procedural statistics trends: 2008 quick facts. US: The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Retrieved January 25, 2015, from http://www.plasticsurgery.org

15. Ishigooka, J., Iwao, M., Suzuki, M., Fukuyama, Y., Murasaki, M. & Miura, S. (1998). Demographic features of patients seeking cosmetic surgery. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 52, 283-287. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1819.1998.00388.x

16. Pierard, G.E., Hermanns-Le, T., Gaspard, U. & Pierard- Franchimont, C. (2014). Asymmetric facial skin viscoelasticity during climacteric aging. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, 7, 111-118. DOI: 10.2147/CCID.S60313

17. Carter Singh, G., Hankins, M.C., Dulku, A. & Kelly, M.B.H. (2006). Psychosocial Aspects of Botox in Aesthetic Surgery. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 30, 71-76. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-005-0150-9

18. Cook, S.A., Rosser, R., Toone, H., James, M.I. & Salmon, P. (2006). The psychological and social characteristics of patients referred for NHS cosmetic surgery: Quantifying clinical need. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 59, 54-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.08.004

19. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117- 140. DOI: 10.1177/001872675400700202

20. Ekman, P. & Friesen, W.V. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 124-129. DOI: 10.1037/ h0030377

21. Stanulović-Kapor, N., Vrgović, P. & Hinić, D. (2009). Komunikologija i komuniciranje u organizaciji. Novi Pazar: Državni univerzitet u Novom Pazaru.

22. Seidell, J.C. (2000). The current epidemic of obesity. In: C. Bouchard (ed.), Physical Activity and Obesity, Vol. 2 (pp. 21-30). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

23. Sarwer, D.B., Magee, L. & Clark, V. (2004). Physical appearance and cosmetic medical treatments: physiological and socio-cultural influences. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 2 (1), 29-39. DOI: 10.1111/j.1473-2130.2003.00003.x

24. Dion, K., Berscheid, E. & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285-290. DOI: 10.1037/h0033731

25. van der Lei, B. (2010). Book review. Cosmetic Medicine & Aesthetic Surgery: Strategies for Success. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 63, 376. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.11.016

Serbian Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research

The Journal of Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.21

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.126
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.081


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 152 148 8
PDF Downloads 64 64 6