Stated Preferences for Improved Air Quality Management in the City of Nairobi, Kenya / Vrednovanje Iskazanih Preferencija Za Unapređenje Kvaliteta Vazduha U Gradu Najrobi U Keniji

Open access


The study uses contingent valuation (CV) framework to assess individuals’ preferences for improved air quality management through motorized emission reductions in the city of Nairobi, Kenya. A conventional payment card (PC) is used to draw preferences from individuals in order to estimate the mean and the median willingness to pay (WTP) for air quality improvements in the city. Through interval regression analysis, the study finds that individuals are, on average, willing to pay Kshs. 396.57 ($4.67) and a median of Kshs. 244.94 ($2.88) to improve air quality management in the city. These amounts are found to increase with male gender, individuals’ income, certainty about future income and residence in an urban area. These amounts, however, decline with age, residential distance from nearby roads, and motor vehicle ownership. On the whole, the study shows significant public support towards improved air quality management in the city, which is of vital importance for effective formation and implementation of air quality management programmes.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ababio O.Y. (2003). New school chemistry. Onitsha: Africana- FEP.

  • Ackerman M. Davies T. Jefferson C. Longhust J. & Marquez J. (2002). Comparison of diesel and hybrid vehicle emissions by computer modelling. Urban Transport VIII 471-480. doi:10.2495/UT020461.

  • Amin A.T.M.N. (2009). Reducing emissions from private cars: Incentive measures for behavioural change. Nairobi Kenya: UNEP. Retrieved Jun 15 2015 from http://www. 20emissions/UNEP%20Reducing%20emissions%20 from%20private%20cars.pdf

  • Arrow K. Solow R. Portney P.R. Leamer E.E. & Radner R.H. (1993). Report on the NOAA Panel on contingent valuations natural resource damage assessment under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990. Federal Register 58 4601-4614.

  • Asian Development Bank. (2003). Reducing vehicle emissions in Asia. Manila Philippines: Asian Development Bank.

  • Bateman I. Carson R.T. Day B. Hanemann W.M. Hanley N. & Hett T. (2002). Economic valuation with stated preferences: A Manual. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar.

  • Brouwer R. (2009). Stated preference uncertainty: signal or noise? Amsterdam: Institute for Environmental Studies VU University Amsterdam.

  • Cadle S.H. Croes B.E. Minassian F. Natarajan M. Tierney E.J. & Lawson D.R. (2004). Real-world vehicle emissions: A summary of the Th irteenth Coordinating Research Council on-road Vehicle Emissions Workshop. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 54(1) 18-23.

  • Cameron T.A. & Huppert D.D. (1989). OLS versus ML estimation of non-market resource values with payment card interval data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 17(3) 230-246. doi:10.1016/0095-0696(89)90018-1.

  • Carlsson F. & Johansson-Stenman O. (2000). Willingness to pay for improved air quality in Sweden. Journal of Applied Economics 32(6) 661-669. doi:10.1080/000368400322273.

  • Carson R.T. (2000). Contingent valuation: a user’s guide. Environmental Science and Technology 34(8) 1413-1418. doi:10.1021/es990728j.

  • Central Bureau of Statistics - CBS. (2009). Economic Survey 2009. Nairobi Kenya: Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS).

  • Colvile R.N. Hutchinson E.J. Mindell J.S. & Warren R.F. (2001). Th e transport sector as a source of air pollution. Atmospheric Environment 35(9) 1537-1565. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00551-3.

  • Dillman D.A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Donfouet H. Cook J. & Jeanty P.W. (2013). Th e economic value of improved air quality in urban Africa: results from Douala Cameroon. Environment and Development Economics 20(5) 630-649. doi:10.1017/S1355770X14000552.

  • Dziegielewska D. & Mendelsohn R. (2005). Valuing air quality in Poland. Journal of Environmental and Resources Economics 30(2) 131-163. doi:10.1007/s10640-004-1515-2.

  • Fabian H.G. & Vergel K.N. (2002). Analysis of air pollution exposure of individuals in the road environment. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 4(5) 55-70.

  • Fazal S. (2006). Addressing congestion and transport-related air pollution in Saharanpur India. Environment and Urbanization 18(1) 141-154.

  • Firoozzarea A. & Ghorbani M. (2011). Investigation of citizens’ WTP for Mashhad air pollution reduction: applying Heckit model. 5th Symposium on Advances in Science & Technology Mashhad Iran. Retrieved Jun 15 2015 from

  • Fonta M. Ichoku H.E. & Nwosu E. (2010). Contingent valuation in community-based project planning: the case of Lake Bamendjim fishery restocking in Cameroon. African Economic Research Consortium Nairobi Research Paper 210. Retrieved Jun 15 2015 from

  • Foster V. & Mourato S. (2003). Elicitation format and sensitivity to scope do contingent valuation and choice experiments give the same results? Environmental and Resource Economics 24(2) 141-160. doi:10.1023/A:1022856329552.

  • Freeman A.M. (1993). Th e measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods. Washington: Resources for the Future.

  • Gwilliam K. (2003). Urban transport in developing countries. Transport Reviews 23(2) 197-216. doi: 10.1080/01441640309893.

  • Gwilliam K. Kojima M. & Johnson T. (2004). Reducing air pollution from urban transport. Washington DC: World Bank.

  • Haab T.C. & McConnell K.E. (2002). Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: the Econometrics of Nonmarket Valuation. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar.

  • Hanley N. Kristrom B. & Shogren J.F. (2009). Coherent arbitrariness: on value uncertainty for environmental goods. Land Economics 85(1) 41-50. doi:10.3368/ le.85.1.41

  • Kinney P.L. Gatari M. Volavka-Close N. Ngo N. Ndiba P.K. Law A. Gachanja A. Gaita M.S. Chilrud S.N. & Sclar E. (2011). Traffi c impacts on PM 2. 5 air quality in Nairobi Kenya. Environmental Science and Policy 14(4) 369-378. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2011.02.005.

  • Klose T. (1999). Th e contingent valuation method in health care. Health Policy 47(2) 97-123.

  • Lilley L.C. (2000). A new approach to emissions inventory modelling - Assessing fuel and vehicle impacts on air quality. Advances in Air Pollution 8 389-398. doi:10.2495/AIR000391.

  • Loomis J. & Ekstrand E. (1998). Alternative approaches for incorporating respondent uncertainty when estimating willingness to pay: The case of the Mexican spotted owl. Ecological Economics 27(1) 29-41. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00126-2.

  • Mendelsohn R. & Olmstead S. (2009). The Economic valuation of environmental amenities and disamenities: methods and applications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 34 325-347. doi:10.1146/annurevenviron-011509-135201.

  • Mitchell R. & Carson R. (1993). Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Washington DC: Resources for the Future.

  • Mitchell R.C. & Carson R.T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Morrison M.D. Blamey R.K. & Bennett J.W. (2000). Minimizing payment vehicle bias in contingent valuation studies. Environmental and Resource Economies 16(4) 407-422. doi:10.1023/A:1008368611972.

  • Mulaku G.C. & Kariuki L.W. (2001). Mapping and analysis of air pollution in Nairobi Kenya. International Conference on Spatial Information for Sustainable Development. Nairobi Kenya. Retrieved Jun 15 2015 from

  • Odhiambo G.O. Kinyua A.M. Gatebe C.K. & Awange J. (2010). Motor vehicles air pollution in Nairobi Kenya. Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences 2(4) 178-187.

  • Omwenga M. (2011). Integrated transport system for liveable city environment: a case study of Nairobi Kenya. 47th ISOCARP Congress. Retrieved Jun 15 2015 from

  • Ryan M. Scott D.A. & Donaldson C. (2004). Valuing health care using willingness to pay: a comparison of the payment card and dichotomous choice methods. Journal of Health Economics 23(2) 237-258. doi:10.1016/j. jhealeco.2003.09.003

  • Sayadi S. Gonzalez-Roa M.C. & Calatrava-Requena J. (2009). Public preferences for landscape features: the case of agricultural landscape in mountainous Mediterranean areas. Land Use Policy 26(2) 334-344. doi:10.1016/j. landusepol.2008.04.003.

  • Strazzera E. Genius M. Scarpa R. & Hutchinson G. (2003). The effect of protest votes on the estimates of WTP for use values of recreational sites. Environmental and Resource Economics 25(4) 461-476. doi:10.1023/A:1025098431440.

  • Venkatachalam L. (2004). Th e contingent valuation method: a review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 24(1) 89-124. doi:10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00138-0.

  • Vliet E.D.S. & Kinney P.L. (2007). Impacts of roadway emissions on urban particulate matter concentrations in sub-Saharan Africa: new evidence from Nairobi Kenya. Environmental Research Letters 2(4) 1-6. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/2/4/045028.

  • Wang H. & Whittington D. (2000). Willingness to pay for air quality improvement in So_ a Bulgaria. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No 2280. Washington DC: World Bank.

  • Wang H. & Whittington D. (2005). Measuring individuals’ valuation distributions using a stochastic payment card approach. Ecological Economics 55(2) 143-154. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.11.011.

  • Wang X.J. Zhang W. Li Y. Yang K.Z. & Bai M. (2006). Air quality improvement estimation and assessment using contingent valuation method: a case study in Beijing. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 120(1) 153-168. doi:10.1007/s10661-005-9054-z.

  • Welsh M.P. & Poe G.L. (1998). Elicitation eff ects in contingent valuation: comparisons to a multiple bounded discrete choice approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36(2) 170-85. doi:10.1006/ jeem.1998.1043.

  • White P.C.L. Bennett A.C. & Hayes E.J.V. (2001). Th e use of willingness-to-pay approaches in mammal conservation. Mammal Review 31(2) 151-167. doi:10.1046/ j.1365-2907.2001.00083.x.

  • Whitehead J. Blomquist G. Ready R. & Huang J. (1998). Construct validity of dichotomous choice contingent valuation questions. Environmental and Resource Economics 11(1) 107-116. doi:10.1023/A:1008231430184.

  • WHO. (2006). Air Quality Guidelines: Global Update 2005. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved Jun 15 2015 from

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 176 94 2
PDF Downloads 58 29 2