Large deformation finite element analysis of undrained pile installation

Open access

Abstract

In this paper, a numerical undrained analysis of pile jacking into the subsoil using Abaqus software suit has been presented. Two different approaches, including traditional Finite Element Method (FEM) and Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) formulation, were tested. In the first method, the soil was modelled as a two-phase medium and effective stress analysis was performed. In the second one (ALE), a single-phase medium was assumed and total stress analysis was carried out. The fitting between effective stress parameters and total stress parameters has been presented and both solutions have been compared. The results, discussion and verification of numerical analyzes have been introduced. Possible applications and limitations of large deformation modelling techniques have been explained.

[1] Atkinson J., The mechanics of soils and foundations, CRC Press, 2007.

[2] Bienen B., Qiu G., Pucker T., CPT correlation developed from numerical analysis to predict jack-up foundation penetration into sand overlying clay, Ocean Engineering, 2015, 108, 216–226, DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.08.009.

[3] Bond A.J., Jardine R.J., Effects of installing displacement piles in a high OCR clay, Geotechnique, 1991, 41(3), 341–363. DOI: 10.1680/geot.1991.41.3.341.

[4] Cummings A.E., Kerkhoff G.O., Peck R.B., Effect of driving piles into soft clay, Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 1950, 115(1), 275–285.

[5] Dai Z.H., Qin Z.Z., Numerical and theoretical verification of modified cam-clay model and discussion on its problems, Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20, 3305–3313, DOI: 10.1007/s11771-013-1854-7.

[6] Dassault Systémes, 2013, Abaqus 6.13 Analysis User’s Guide, Dassault Systèmes.

[7] Donea J.H., Huerta A., Ponthot J.-Ph., RodríguezFerran A., Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian Methods, [in:] Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanic, Vol. 1. Fundamentals, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2004, 413–437, DOI: 10.1002/0470091355.ecm009.

[8] Hamann T., Qiu G., Grabe J., Application of a Coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian approach on pile installation problems under partially drained conditions, Computers and Geotechnics, 2015, 63, 279–290, DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.10.006.

[9] Komurka V.E., Wagner A.B., Edil T.B., A Review of Pile Set-Up, Proc., 51st Annual Geotechnical Engineering Conference, 2003.

[10] Mabsout M.E., Tassoulas J.L., A finite element model for the simulation of pile driving, International Journal for numerical methods in Engineering, 1994, 37(2), 257–278, DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620370206.

[11] Noh W.F., CEL: a time-dependent, two-space-dimensional, coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian code. Lawrence Radiation Lab., Univ. of California, Livermore, 1963.

[12] Potts D.M., Zdravković L., Finite element analysis in geotechnical engineering: theory, Vol. 1, Thomas Telford, 1999, DOI: 10.1680/feaiget.27534.

[13] Tho K.K., Leung C.F., Chow Y.K., Swaddiwudhipong S., Eulerian finite element simulation of spudcan–pile interaction, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2013, 50(6), 595–608, DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2012-0288.

[14] Vermeer P.A., Verruijt A., An accuracy condition for consolidation by finite elements, International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1981, 5(1), 1–14. DOI: 10.1002/nag.1610050103

[15] Yi J.T., Zhao B., Li Y.P., Yang Y., Lee F.H., Goh S.H., Zhang X.Y., Wu J.F., Post-installation pore-pressure changes around spudcan and long-term spudcan behaviour in soft clay, Computers and Geotechnics, 2014, 56, 133–147, DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.11.007.

[16] Zhou T.Q., Tan F., Li C., Numerical Analysis for Excess Pore Pressure Dissipation Process for Pressed Pile Installation, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, Vol. 405, 133–137, DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.405-408.133.

Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica

The Journal of Wrocław University of Science and Technology and AGH University of Science and Technology

Journal Information

CiteScore 2018: 1.03

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.213
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.106

Cited By

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 231 189 14
PDF Downloads 111 104 13