Liquefaction mechanism induced by dynamic excitation modeled in Plaxis AE with the use of UBC and MOHR–coulomb constitutive relationships

Open access


Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) is commonly used in modern design of the various types of structures. There are two main issues/aspects that should be consider while using CAE in Geotechnics: the basic theory and material model. The paper deals with a problem of choosing the proper constitutive relationships which according to the authors are equally important in obtaining correct and reasonable results. This problem is illustrated by an example of dynamic calculations of fully saturated non-cohesive soils where liquefaction phenomenon is most likely to occur.

[1] Chen J.W., Chen F.C., The penetration experiment to predict liquefaction resistance of reclaimed soils, Ocean Engineering, 2008, 35, 380–392.

[2] Daftari A., Kudla W., Prediction of Soil Liquefaction by Using UBC3D-PLM Model in PLAXIS, International Journal of Environmental, Ecological, Geological and Mining Engineering, 2014.

[3] Galavi V. et al., Finite Element Modelling of Seismic Liquefaction in Soils, Geotechnical Engineering Journal of the SEAGS & AGSSEA, 2013, 44.

[4] Haritos N., Modelling ocean waves and their effects on offshore structures, Australian Earthquake Engineering Society 2010 Conference.

[5] Hwang J.H. et al., A practical reliability-based method for assessing soil liquefaction potential, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2004, 24, 761–770.

[6] Noorzad R. et. al., The effect of structures on the wave-induced liquefaction potential of seabed sand deposits, Applied Ocean Research, 2009, 31, 25–30.

[7] Makra A., Evaluation of the UBC3D-PLM constitutive model for prediction of earthquake induced liquefaction on embankment dams, MSc. Graduation Thesis, 2013.

[8] Lenz A., Baise G., Spatial variability of liquefaction potential in regional mapping using CPT and SPT data. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2007, 27, 690–702.

[9] Petalas A., Galavi V., Plaxis Liquefaction Model UBC3DPLM, PLAXIS, 2013.

[10] Puebla H., Byrne M., Phillips P., Analysis of CANLEX liquefaction embankments prototype and centrifuge models,. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1997, 34, 641.

[11] Tsegaye A.B., Liquefaction Model UBC3D, PLAXIS, 2010.

[12] Wiłun Z., Zarys geotechniki, Wydawnictwo Komunikacji i Łączności, 2013.

[13] Winterwerp J.C. et al., Mud-induced wave damping and wave-induced liquefaction, Coastal Engineering, 2012, 64, 102–112.

[14] Xiao H. et al., Parametric study of breaking solitary wave induced liquefaction of coastal sandy slopes, Ocean Engineering, 2010, 37, 1546–1553.

[15] Ye. J., 3D liquefaction criteria for seabed considering the cohesion and friction of soil, Applied Ocean Research, 2012, 37, 111–119.

[16] Zhang Y. et al., An analytical solution for response of a porous seabed to combined wave and current loading, Ocean Engineering, 57, 240–247, 2013.

[17] Strong-Motion Virtual Data Center, Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data,

[18] Central Geological Database, Polish Geological Institute,

[19] COSMOS Virtual Data Center, Consortium of Organizations for Strong-Motion Observation Systems,

Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica

The Journal of Wrocław University of Science and Technology and AGH University of Science and Technology

Journal Information

CiteScore 2018: 1.03

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.213
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.106

Cited By


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 307 246 16
PDF Downloads 219 197 8