Numerical Simulations of Blast Loads from Near-Field Ground Explosions in Air

Open access

Abstract

Numerical simulations of air blast loading in the near-field acting on the ground have been performed. A simplified blast model based on empirical blast loading data representing spherical and hemispherical explosive shapes has been simulated. Conwep is an implementation of the empirical blast models presented by Kingery and Bulmash, which is also implemented in the commercial code LS-DYNA based on work done by Rahnders-Pehrson and Bannister. This makes it possible to simulate blast loads acting on structures representing spherical and hemispherical explosive shapes of TNT with reasonable computational effort as an alternative to the SPH and Eulerian model. The CPU time for the simplified blast model is however considerably shorter and may still be useful in time consuming concept studies. Reasonable numerical results using reasonable model sizes can be achieved not only for modelling near-field explosions in air but most areas of geotechnical. Calculation was compared with blast SPH and Eulerian model.

[1] Kingery C.N., Bulmash G., Airblast parameters from TNT spherical air burst and hemispherical surface burst, ARBRL-TR-02555. MD: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, 1984.

[2] Randers-Pehrson G., Bannister K., Airblast loading model for DYNA2D and DYNA3D, ARL-TR-1310, Army Research Laboratory, 1997.

[3] LS-DYNA® KEYWORD USER’S MANUAL VOLUME II Material Models. 01/02/15 (r:5991) LS-DYNA Dev, Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC), 2015.

[4] Zakrisson B., Wikman B., Häggblad H., Numerical simulations of blast loads and structural deformation from near-field explosions in air, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2011, 38, 597–612.

[5] Johnson G.R., Cook W.H., A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures, Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, The Hague, The Netherlands, 23 Apr. 1983.

[6] Flis L., Sperski M., Badania odporności osłon warstwowych zbudowanych ze stali kadłubowych na ostrzał pociskami 12,7 mm, ZN AMW nr 4 Gdynia, 2013.

[7] Sonntag R.E., Borgnakke C., Van Wylen G.J., Fundamentals of thermodynamics, 6th ed., Wiley, Cop., New York, 2003.

[8] Lewis B., Manual for LS-DYNA Soil Material Model 147, Federal Highway Administrator, McLEAN, VA, publication No. FHWA-HRT-095 (2004).

[9] Arulmoli K., Muraleetharan M., Hossain M., Velacs verification of liquefaction analyses by centrifuge studies laboratory testing program soil data report, Tech. rep., The Earth Technology Corp., Project No. 90-0562. Irvine, California (March 1992).

[10] Dobrociński S., Stabilność rozwiązań zagadnień odporności udarowej konstrukcji, Biblioteka Problemów Eksploatacji, AMW, Gdynia 2000.

[12] ANSYS, AUTODYN®, Explicit Software for Nonlinear Dynamics, SPH User Manual & Tutorial, Revision 4.3, Century Dynamics, 2005.

[13] Andersen K.H., Børsum Hernandez F., Numerical Simulations of Docol 600 DL Steel Plates Subject to Blast Loading, Department of Structural Engineering, NTNU, Trondheim, 2013.

[14] Baranowski P., Małachowski J., Numerical study of selected military vehiclechassis subjected to blast loading in terms of tire strength improving, Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Technical Sciences, Vol. 63, No. 4, 2015.

[15] Mazurkiewicz Ł., Małachowski J., Baranowski P., Blast loading influence on load carrying capacity of I-column, Engineering Structures 104 (2015) 107–115.

[16] Mazurkiewicz Ł., Małachowski J., Baranowski P., Optimization of protective panel for critical supporting elements,Composite Structures 134 (2015) 493–505.

Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica

The Journal of Wrocław University of Science and Technology and AGH University of Science and Technology

Journal Information

CiteScore 2018: 1.03

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.213
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.106

Cited By

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 268 231 23
PDF Downloads 126 114 5