The article delineates the main methodological deficiencies and datasets available for comparing income inequality at the European and world level. The article is divided in two parts. In the first part of the article, I present the main datasets and methodological deficiencies when trying to compare income inequality in the world. Although efforts have been made in the last decades to generate comparative databases, the qualities of some indicators are rather doubtful and also there is no common ground on conceptualizing inequality indicators and measuring them, some of which are income-based, while others are household expenditure-based. Then, I present two classical studies on studying income inequality after the Washington consensus. In the second part of the article I sketch an overview of rising income inequality in Romania after 1989 by presenting some income inequality indicators and comparing them with other former CEE countries. However, I will pinpoint that Romania’s case is rather exceptional in the EU and, when comparing standard income inequality indicators, further explication needs to be delivered. I conclude that while income inequality is the result of macro-structural changes that occurred during the transition to market capitalism, political decisions are not to be played-down.
Ban, Cornel. 2014. Dependență și dezvoltare. Economia politică a capitalismului românesc. Cluj-Napoca: Tact.
Bandelj, Nina and Matthew Mahutga. 2010a. “Rising Income Inequalities in Central and Eastern Europe: The Influence of Economic Globalization and Other Social Forces.” In Globalization and Transformations of Social Inequality, edited by Ulrike Schuerkens, 193-218. New York: Routledge.
Bandelj, Nina and Matthew Mahutga. 2010b. “How Socio-Economic Change Shapes Income Inequality in Post-Socialist Europe.” Social Forces 88(5): 2133-2161.
Bohle, Dorothee and Bela Greskovits. 2012. Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Deaton, Angus. 2017. Marea evadare. Sănătatea, bogăția și originile inegalității [The Great Escape: Health, Wealth, and the Origins of Inequality]. București: Litera.
Deininger, Klaus and Lyn Squire. 1996. “A New Data Set Measuring Income Inequality.” The World Bank Economic Review 10(3): 565-591.
Domnișoru, Ciprian. 2014. The largest drop in income inequality in the European Union during the Great Recession: Romania’s puzzling case. Geneva: International Labour Organisation.
Eurostat. n.d. S80/S20 income quintile share ratio - EU-SILC survey [ilc_di11]. Accessed 2017, July 11.
Eurostat. n.d. Minimum wage in the EU [tps00155]. Accessed 2017, July 11.
Eurostat. n.d. Gini coefficient of equivalised disposable income - EU-SILC survey [ilc_di12]. Accessed 2017, July 11.
Franco, Chiara and Elisa Gerussi. 2013. “Trade, foreign direct investments (FDI) and income inequality: Empirical evidence from transition countries.” The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 22(8): 1131-1160.
Galbraith, James. 2016. Despre inegalitate. Teoria inegalității economice pe înțelesul tuturor [Inequality: What Everyone Needs to Know]. București: Publica.
Garnero, Andrea, Stephan Kampelmann, and Francois Rycx. 2015. “Minimum wage systems and earnings inequalities: Does institutional diversity matter?” European Journal of Industrial Relations 21(2): 115–130.
Harvey, David. 2007. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hoffer, Frank, Pierre Laliberte, and Tandiwe Gross. 2013. The Challenge of Inequality: Time for Change. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
ICCV. 2010. Raportul social al ICCV. După 20 de ani: opțiuni pentru România. București: Institutul de Cercetare a Calității Vieții.
Institutul Național de Statistică (NIS). 2015. Coordonate ale nivelului de trai în România. Veniturile și consumul populației, în anul 2015. București: Institutul Național de Statistică.
Institutul Național de Statistică (NIS). n.d. Tempo database: Average monthly nominal net earnings by economic activities [FOM106E]. Accessed 2017, July 11.