Social Work or Relief Work? A Crisis in Professional Social Work

Open access

Abstract

Social work is a sharing and caring profession based on scientific methods. This problem solving profession makes people self-reliant and self-dependent when he/she is in any sorts of crises. Thus, it differs from relief work, social services or social welfare delivered during emergence crises. This paper examined the application of professional social work as relief work, which did not bring any change among the beneficiaries; rather it set their mind as opportunist. For this purpose, the programme sponsored by the government of India and implemented by nongovernmental organizations for rehabilitation of the street children (i.e., pavements and slums dwellers, children of sex workers, and so forth) of Metro cities like Kolkata had priority. This evaluative study assessed the progress and changes among 500 street children who were the beneficiaries for 10 years of the programme, selected according to their parental residents/occupation through stratified sampling. Interviews, case studies and group interaction were used to collect data on various aspects, i.e. personal background, education, and occupation of these children. It revealed that after almost 10 years of services, the problem of children was static. Firstly, service delivery system was as relief work. The methods of social work were not implied while the professionals were in implementation. On the other hand, the scope of monitoring and evaluation of the programme by government was suspended due to several reasons. Definitely, the politicalization in human development would be restricted. The problems of suffering would be root out and it should not be a continued process.

Apte, Robert Z. 1982. Introduction to Social Welfare. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall.

International Federation of Social Workers. 2014. “Global Definition of Social Work. Definition Approved by the IFSW General Meeting and the IASSW General Assembly.” http://ifsw.org/policies/definition-ofsocial-work/.

Kennedy, Robert, and Jacqueline Novogratz. 2010. “Innovation for the BoP: The Patient Capital Approach.” In Next Generation Business Strategies for the Base of the Pyramid: New Approaches for Building Mutual Value, edited by Ted London and Stuart L. Hart, 45-78. New Jersey: FT Press.

Mathew, Grace. 1992. An Introduction to Social Casework. Bombay: Tata Institute of Social Sciences.

Mishra, P. Ḍ. 1994. Social Work Philosophy and Methods. New Delhi: Inter- India Publications.

National Association of Social Workers, USA. 1996. “Code of Ethics of the National Association of Social Workers.” http://www.socialworkers.org/pubs/code/code.asp.

Payne, Malcolm. 2011. Humanistic Social Work: Core Principles in Practice. Chicago: Lyceum Books.

Popple, Philip R., and Leslie Leighninger. 2011. Social Work, Social Welfare, and American Society. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Ranganathananda, Swami. 2000. Proceedings of the question-answer session: Vivekananda Vedanta Society, Chicago, 1982. Calcutta: Advaita Ashrama, Publication Dept.

Sharma, Dinesh. 2003. “Introduction. Infancy and Childhood in India: A Review.” In Childhood, Family, and Sociocultural Change in India: Reinterpreting the Inner World, edited by Dinesh Sharma, 1-46. New Delhi ; New York: Oxford University Press.

Sheldon, Brian, and Geraldine M. Macdonald. 2009. A Textbook of Social Work. New York, NY: Routledge.

Sinha, Dikshit. 2011. Rabindranather Pallypunargathan Praya. Kolkata: Paschim Banga Bangla Academy.

Social Change Review

The Journal of „Lucian Blaga“ University of Sibiu

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 716 670 87
PDF Downloads 492 461 73