Mandarin and Scalarity

Open access


This paper examines the use of Mandarin ‘also’ in contexts which dōu can be used as well, e.g., in no matter and even contexts. I argue that there is a correlation between the possibility of using and the presence of a scalar reading as well as a reference to an extremity on the scale in question. The data we present show that is invariably associated with scalar readings: is always used in scalar contexts, and contexts that are not obviously scalar become so when is used. I also argue that a scalar interpretation of wh-elements in no matter contexts can be derived with the aid of negation or modals, thus accounting for the felicitousness of in such contexts. The paper ends with a short note on lián, hypothesizing that its function is to introduce the extreme of the scale. I also argue that the licensing condition of the additive/basic , i.e., the presence of alternatives in the background, also plays a role in the scalar use of .

Alleton, Viviane. 1972. Les adverbes en Chinois moderne. Den Haag: Mouton & Co.

Beaver, David I. & Brady Z. Clark. 2008. Sense and sensitivity: How focus determines meaning. Oxford: Blackwell.

Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. Degree words. The Hague: Mouton.

Chen, Liping. 2008. Dou: Distributivity and beyond. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University dissertation.

Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 1991. On the typology of Wh-questions. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.

Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 1995. On dou-quantification. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4. 197–234.

Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 2009. On every type of quantificational expression in Chinese. In Monika Rathert & Anastasia Giannakidou (eds.), Quantification, definiteness, and nominalization, 53–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Anastasia Giannakidou. 2013. The non-uniformity of wh-indeterminates with free choice and polarity in Chinese. In George Tsoulas & Kook-Hee Gill (eds.), The nature of quantification and crosslinguistic variation, 123–154. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chierchia, Gennaro. 2013. Logic in grammar: Polarity, free choice, and intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Constantinescu, Camelia. 2011. Gradability in the nominal domain. Leiden: University of Leiden dissertation.

Duffley, Patrick & Pierre Larrivée. 2010. Anyone for non-scalarity. English Language and Linguistics 14(1). 1–17.

Eifring, Halvor. 1995. Clause combination in Chinese. Leiden: Brill.

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1975. Pragmatic scales and logical structure. Linguistic Inquiry 6. 353–375.

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1978. Implication reversal in a natural language. In Franz Guenthner & Siegfried Johannes Schmidt (eds.), Formal semantics and pragmatics for natural language, 289–301. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Fintel, Kai von. 2000. ‘Whatever’. In Proceedings of the 10th Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT X). 27–39.

Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1997. The landscape of polarity items. Groningen: University of Groningen dissertation.

Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2001. The meaning of free choice. Linguistics and Philosophy 24. 659–735.

Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2007. The landscape of even. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25. 39–81.

Giannakidou, Anastasia & Lisa Cheng. 2006. (In)Definiteness, polarity, and the role of wh-morphology in free choice. Journal of Semantics 23. 135–183.

Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Heim, Irene. 1984. A note on negative polarity and downward entailingness. In Charles Jones & Peter Sells (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 14, 98–107. Amherst: GLSA.

Hole, Daniel. 2004. Focus and background marking in Mandarin Chinese: System and theory behind cái, jiù, dōu and yĕ. London & New York: Routledge Curzon.

Hole, Daniel. 2008. EVEN, ALSO and ONLY in Vietnamese. In Shinichiro Ishihara, Svetlana Petrova & Anne Schwarz (eds.), Interdisciplinary studies in information structure 11, 1–54. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.

Hole, Daniel. 2013. Focus particles and related entities in Vietnamese. In Daniel Hole & Elisabeth Löbel (eds.), Linguistics of Vietnamese: An international survey, 265–303. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.

Hole, Daniel. 2017. A crosslinguistic syntax of scalar and non-scalar focus particle sentences: The view from Vietnamese and Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 26(4). 389–409.

Horn, Laurence R. 2005. Airport ‘86 revisited: Toward a unified indefinite any. In Gregory N. Carlson & Francis Jeffrey Pelletier (eds.), Reference and quantification: The Partee effect, 179–205. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Hou, Xuechao (ed.). 1998. Xiandai hanyu xuci cidian [Dictionary of function words in contemporary Chinese]. Beijing: Beijing Daxue Chubanshe [Peking university press].

Jacobs, Joachim. 1983. Fokus und Skalen. Zur Syntax und Semantik der Gradpartikeln im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Jiang, Jingzhong & Haihua Pan. 2013. “Dōu” de yǔyì fēnhé jí jiěshì guīzé [How many DOUs do we really need?]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language], 1. 38–50.

Jiang, Yan. 2008. Tījí móxíng yǔ “dōu” de yǔyì kèhuà [Scalar model and the semantic characterization of “dou”]. In Cheng Gong & Liu Danqing (eds.), Hànyǔ de xíngshì yǔ gōngnéng yánjiū [Formal and functional studies in Chinese], 123–132. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan [The commercial press].

Kennedy, Chris. 1997. Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. Santa Cruz, CA: University of California, Santa Cruz dissertation.

Kennedy, Chris. 2007. Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(1). 1–45.

König, Ekkehard. 1991. The meaning of focus particles. A comparative perspective. London & New York: Routledge.

Krifka, Manfred. 1995. The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items. Linguistic Analysis 25. 209–257.

Krifka, Manfred. 1999. Additive particles under stress. In Proceedings of the 8th Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT VIII). 111–129.

Lassiter, Dan. 2011. Measurement and modality: The scalar basis of modal semantics. New York, NY: New York University dissertation.

Lee, Thomas. 1986. Studies on quantification in Chinese. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.

Lin, Jo-Wang. 1996. Polarity licensing and wh-phrase quantification in Chinese. Massachusetts, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.

Lin, Jo-Wang. 1998, On existential polarity wh-phrases in Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7. 219–255.

Liu, Feng-hsi. 1990. Scope dependency in English and Chinese. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.

Liu, Yuehua (ed.). 2001. Shiyong xiandai hanyu yufa [Practical modern Chinese grammar]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan [The commercial press].

Lü, Shuxiang (ed.). 1995. Xiandai hanyu babai ci [Eight hundred words in modern Chinese]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan [The commercial press].

Nakanishi, Kimiko. 2006. Even, only, and negative polarity in Japanese. In Proceedings of the 16th Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT XVI).138–155.

Paris, Marie-Claude. 1979. Some aspects of the syntax and semantics of the lianye/dou construction in Mandarin. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 5. 47–70.

Shyu, Shu-ing. 1995. The syntax of focus and topic in Mandarin Chinese. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California dissertation.

Shyu, Shu-ing. 2016. Minimizers and EVEN. Linguistics 54(6). 1355–1395.

Solt, Stephanie. 2015. Measurement scales in natural language. Language and Linguistics Compass 9(1). 14–32.

Sybesma, Rint. 1996. Review of “The syntax of focus and topic in Mandarin Chinese” by Shyu Shu-ing. GLOT International 2. 13–14.

Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Xiang, Ming. 2008. Plurality, maximality and scalar inferences: A case study of Mandarin dou. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17. 227–245.

Yang, Yiming. 1988. Ye zi yuyi chutan [A study on semantics of ye]. Yuwen Yanjiu [Linguistics research] 29(4). 56–59.

Zhang, Ning. 1997. Syntactic dependencies in Mandarin Chinese. Toronto: University of Toronto dissertation.

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 132 132 52
PDF Downloads 125 125 41