Understanding S-Selection

Open access


I report a few study notes of semantic selection in this paper. First, if derivational affixes s-select roots, which have no categorial features, s-selection may be implemented independently of c-selection. Second, in certain constructions, it seems that s-selected features do not take part in the syntactic operations that establish syntactic dependencies, and thus the inspection of s-selection seems to be local to the merge domain. I also examine s-selection between phrases, showing that it follows the same projection principle as seen in the c-selection between phrases.


詞語間的語意選擇有可能獨立於詞類選擇。如果詞根沒有詞類,那麼派生詞綴對詞 根的語意選擇就獨立於詞類選擇。其次,在某些句式中,兩個成分之間的句法依賴 關係也有可能獨立於語意特徵的選擇。因此,對語意選擇的檢驗可以是局部的。本 文亦討論兩個短語之間的語意選擇關係,發現短語之間的語意選擇關係跟短語之間 的詞類選擇關係遵守同樣的投射原則。

Adger, David. 2003. Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Alexiadou, Artemis & Florian Schäfer. 2006. Instrument subjects are agents or causers. Proceedings of WCCFL 25. 40-48.

Bianchi, Valentina. 2000. The raising analysis of relative clauses: A reply to Borsley, Linguistic Inquiry 31. 123-140.

Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring sense: An exo-skeletal trilogy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Browning, Marguerite. 1987. Null operator constructions. Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.

Bruening, Benjamin. 2010. Ditransitive asymmetries and a theory of idiom formation. Linguistic Inquiry 41(4). 519-562.

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On wh-movement. In Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds.) Formal syntax. 71-132. New York: Academic Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Studies in Generative Grammar 9. Dordrecht: Foris.

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik. 89–155. MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 1-22.

Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130. 33-49.

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Collins, Chris. 1997. Argument sharing in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 28. 461-497.

Cowper, Elizabeth A. 1992. A consice introduction to syntactic theory. Chicago: University Chicago Press.

De Belder, Marijke. 2011. Roots and affixes: Eliminating lexical categories from syntax. Utrecht University dissertation.

Demirdache, Hamida. 1991. Resumptive chains in restrictive relatives, appositives and dislocation structures. Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.

Di Sciullo, Anna Maria. 2005. Asymmetric morphology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Grimshaw, Jane. 1979. Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10. 279-326.

Grimshaw, Jane. 1981. Form, function and the language acquisition device. In Carl Lee Baker & John J. McCarthy (eds.), The logical problem of language acquisition. 165–182. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz.1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth L. Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The View from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Harley, Heidi. 1995. Subjects, events, and licensing. Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD thesis.

Harley, Heidi. 2005. Bare phrase structure, acategorial roots, one-replacement and unaccusativity. In Slava Gorbachov & Andrew Nevins (eds.), Harvard working papers on linguistics 9. 45–63. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Henderson, Robert. 2014 (Under review). Swarms: Spatiotemporal grouping across domains. http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/002014.

Hole, Daniel. 2015. Arguments and adjuncts. In Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds.), Syntax. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 1285-1321.

Hornstein, Norbert and Jairo Nunes 2002. On asymmetries between parasitic gap and across-the-board constructions. Syntax 5. 26-54.

Huang, James C-T. 1993. Reconstruction and the structure of VP: Some theoretical consequences. Linguistic Inquiry 24. 103-138.

Jackendoff, Ray. 1987. The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 18. 369-411.

Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Koopman, Hilda & Anna Szabolcsi. 2000. Verbal complexes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Krifka, Manfred. 1992. Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In Ivan Sag & Aanna Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical matters, 29–53. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Landau, Idan. 2007. EPP extensions. Linguistic Inquiry 38(3). 485-483.

Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lieber, Rochelle. 2006. The category of roots and the roots of categories: What we learn from selection in derivation. Morphology 16(2). 247-272.

Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In Alexis Dimitriadis & Laura Siegel (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium (University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics). 201–225. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

McNally, Louise. 2016. Modification. In Maria Aloni & Paul Dekker (eds.) Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. In press.

Munn, Alan 1992. A null operator analysis of ATB gaps. The Linguistic Review 9. 1-26.

Odijk, Jan. 1997. C-selection and s-selection. Linguistic Inquiry 28. 365-371.

Pesetsky, David. 1992. Zero syntax, MA: MIT Press.

Pollard, Carl and Ivan A. Sag. 1987. Information-based syntax and semantics. Volume 1: Fundamentals. CA: Center for the Study of Language and Informaton.

Pylkkänen, Liina. 1999. Causation and external arguments. In Liina Pylkkänen, Angeliek van Hout & Heidi Harley (eds.), Papers from the UPenn/MIT roundtable on the lexicon. 161–183. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL 35.

Ramchand, Gillian Catriona. 2008a. Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ramchand, Gillian Catriona. 2008b. Lexical items in complex predications: Selection as underassociation. In Peter Svenonius & Inna Tolskaya (eds.), Tromsø working papers on language & linguistics: Nordlyd 35, special issue on complex predication. 115–141. CASTL, Tromsø.

Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar. 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Sportiche, Dominique. 1995. Sketch of a reductionist approach to syntactic variation and dependencies. In Hector Campos & Paula Kempchinsky (eds.), Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory. 356-398. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Tang, Chih-Chen Jane 1990. Chinese phrase structure and the extended X-theory. Cornell University PhD dissertation.

Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1974. French relative clauses. Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD dissertation.

Webelhuth, Gert. 1992. Principles and parameters of syntactic saturation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Williams, Edwin S. 1977. Across-the-board application of rules, Linguistic Inquiry 8. 419-423.

Williams, Edwin S. 1978. Across-the-board rule application, Linguistic Inquiry 9. 31-43.

Wiltschko, Martina. 2014. The Universal structure of categories: Towards a formal typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zhang, Niina Ning. 2012. Projecting semantic features. Studia Linguistica 66(1). 58-74.

Zhang, Niina Ning. 2013. Classifier structures in Mandarin Chinese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1987. Levels of representation in the lexicon and in the syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 969 957 24
PDF Downloads 123 123 7