A Note on Weak vs. Strong Generation in Human Language

Open access


This paper argues that various important results of formal language theory (e.g., the so-called Chomsky Hierarchy) may in fact be illusory as far as the human language faculty is concerned, as has been repeatedly emphasized by Chomsky himself. The paper takes up nested dependencies and cross-serial dependencies, the two important dependencies that typically show up in the discussion of the central classes of grammars and languages, and specifically shows that the fact that nested dependencies abound in human language while cross-serial dependencies are rather limited in human language can be naturally explained if we shift our attention from dependencies defined on terminal strings to abstract structures behind them. The paper then shows that nested dependencies are readily obtained by Merge, applying phase-by-phase, whereas cross-serial dependencies are available only as a result of copying Merge, which requires a constituency of the relevant strings. These results strongly suggest that dependencies are possible in human language only to the extent that they are the results from the structures that can be generated by Merge, leading to the conclusion that it is Merge-generability that determines various dependencies in human language, and that dependencies defined on the terminal strings are indeed illusory. A possible brain science experiment to demonstrate this point is also suggested.

Chomsky, Noam. 1956. Three models for the description of language. I.R.E. Transactions on Information Theory 2. 113-124. [Reprinted with corrections in 1965. In R. Duncan Luce, Robert R. Bush & Eugene Galanter (eds.), Readings in mathematical psychology II, 105-124. New York: John Wiley & Sons.]

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.

Chomsky, Noam. 1963. Formal properties of grammars. In R. Duncan Luce, Robert R. Bush & Eugene Galanter (eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology II, 323-418. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: its nature, origins, and use. New York: Praeger.

Collins, Chris & Edward Stabler. 2011. A formalization of minimalist syntax. Ms., New York University and University of California, Los Angeles.

Everaert, Martin & Riny Huybregts. 2013. The design principles of natural language. In Johan J. Bolhuis & Martin Everaert (eds.), Birdsong, speech, and language: exploring the evolution of mind and brain, 3-26. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Joshi, Aravind. 1985. How much context-sensitivity is necessary for characterizing structural descriptions. In David Dowty, Lauri Karttunen & Arnold Zwicky (eds.), Natural language processing: theoretical, computational and psychological perspectives, 206-250. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ohta, Shinri, Naoki Fukui & Kuniyoshi L. Sakai. 2013a. Syntactic computation in the human brain: the degree of merger as a key factor. PLoS ONE 8(2), e56230. 1-16.

Ohta, Shinri, Naoki Fukui & Kuniyoshi L. Sakai. 2013b. Computational principles of syntax in the regions specialized for language: integrating theoretical linguistics and functional neuroimaging. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 7(204). 1-13.

Ohta, Shinri, Masatomi Iizawa, Kazuki Iijima, Tomoya Nakai, Naoki Fukui, Mihoko Zushi, Hiroki Narita & Kuniyoshi L. Sakai. 2014. An on-going research: the experimental design. Paper presented at the CREST Workshop with Noam Chomsky, The University of Tokyo, March.

Stabler, Edward. 2004. Varieties of crossing dependencies: structure dependence and mild context sensitivity. Cognitive Science 28. 699-720.

Stabler, Edward. 2010. Computational perspectives on minimalism. In Cedric Boeckx (ed.), Oxford handbook of minimalism, 617-641. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 334 331 21
PDF Downloads 92 92 7