Corporate Sustainability – From a Fuzzy Concept to a Coherent Reality

Open access


During the last few decades, the search for sustainability has experienced a tremendous momentum, encompassing all the levels of the global system. Fuelled by complex (both proactive and reactive) motivators, the process has surpassed the characteristics of an intellectual endeavor – more preoccupied by idealist goals, and less focused on the actual means to achieve them – and has proved that it can successfully be transposed into the corporate real world – of decision making, objective assessment, and relentless scrutiny. The paper aims to (broadly) explore the world of the most sustainable corporations – based on a descriptive (factual and dynamic) analysis of Corporate Knight’s annual rankings (2016-2018) of the Most Sustainable Corporations – in order to: (a). determine (by comparing and contrasting) the main features these organizations – able to transform the fuzzy concept of corporate sustainability into a coherent reality – display; and (b). set the premises for future (narrower) researches – aiming to explain the “how-s” behind the design, development and implementation of the strategies these corporations follow in their search for (sustainable) competitiveness.

Abraham, T., & Dao, V. (2017). An Empirical Investigation of Sustainability Innovation Systems and the Stages of Sustainability Maturity.

Adams, C., & Narayanan, V. (2007). The ‘standardization’ of sustainability reporting. Sustainability accounting and accountability, 70-85.

Ameer, R., & Othman, R. (2012). Sustainability practices and corporate financial performance: A study based on the top global corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 61-79.

Baumgartner, R. J., & Ebner, D. (2010). Corporate sustainability strategies: sustainability profiles and maturity levels. Sustainable Development, 18(2), 76-89.

Brown, B. J., Hanson, M. E., Liverman, D. M., & Merideth, R. W. (1987). Global Sustainability: Toward Definition. Environmental Management, 11(6), 713-719.

Clayton, T., & Radcliffe, N. (2015). Sustainability: a systems approach. Routledge.

Communication From The Commission (2017). Guidelines on non-financial reporting. (Methodology for reporting non-financial information). (2017/C 215/01).

Corporate Knights (2016). 2016 Global 100 results. 100 World’s Most Sustainable Corporations.

Corporate Knights (2017). 2017 Global 100 results. 100 World’s Most Sustainable Corporations.

Corporate Knights (2018). 2018 Global 100 results. 100 World’s Most Sustainable Corporations.

Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups.

Ditlev Simonsen, C. D., & Midttun, A. (2011). What motivates managers to pursue corporate responsibility? A survey among key stakeholders. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(1), 25-38.

Engardio, P., Capell, K., Carey, J., & Hall, K. (2007). Beyond the green corporation: Imagine a world in which eco-friendly and socially responsible practices actually help a company’s bottom line. It’s closer than you think. Business Week, 4019, 50.

Epstein, M. J., & Buhovac, A. R. (2014). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002). The sustainability balanced scorecard–linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business strategy and the Environment, 11(5), 269-284.

Gianni, M., Gotzamani, K., & Tsiotras, G. (2017). Multiple perspectives on integrated management systems and corporate sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 1297-1311.

Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2010). Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: you can’t have your cake and eat it. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 217-229.

Haywood, L. K., & Van der Watt, C. (2016). Building resilience into business strategy, management and reporting: Principles and maturity tool to facilitate resilience in business, 2016.

Hubbard, G. (2009). Measuring Organizational Performance: Beyond the Triple Bottom Line. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(3), 177-191.

Ivory, S. B., & Brooks, S. B. (2018). Managing corporate sustainability with a paradoxical lens: Lessons from strategic agility. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 347-361.

Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., Hall, J. M., Jaeger, C. C., Lowe, I., ... & Faucheux, S. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292(5517), 641-642.

Lubin, D. A., & Esty, D. C. (2010). The Sustainability Imperative. Harvard Business Review, 88(5), 42-50.

Montiel, I., & Delgado-Ceballos, J. (2014). Defining and measuring corporate sustainability: Are we there yet?. Organization & Environment, 27(2), 113-139.

Nguyen, D. K., & Slater, S. F. (2010). Hitting the sustainability sweet spot: Having it all. Journal of Business Strategy, 31(3), 5-11.

Norton, B. G. (2005). Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. University of Chicago Press.

Pal, M., & Jenkins, J. J. (2014). Reimagining Sustainability: An Interrogation of the Corporate Knights’ Global 100. Environmental Communication, 8(3), 388-405.

Pinelli, M., & Maiolini, R. (2017). Strategies for Sustainable Development: Organizational Motivations, Stakeholders’ Expectations and Sustainability Agendas. Sustainable Development, 25(4), 288-298.

Popa, F., Guillermin, M., & Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2015). A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: From complex systems theory to reflexive science. Futures, 65, 45-56.

Searcy, C. (2016). Without a definition of corporate sustainability, how to measure performance?. LSE Business Review.

Skjølsvold, T. M. (2013). What we disagree about when we disagree about sustainability. Society & Natural Resources, 26(11), 1268-1282.

United Nations (UN). (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

United Nations (UN). (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future.

Van Marrewijk, M., & Werre, M. (2003). Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business ethics, 44(2-3), 107-119.

Verstegen, S. W., & Hanekamp, J. C. (2005). The sustainability debate: Idealism versus conformism–the controversy over economic growth. Globalizations, 2(3), 349-362.

Vos, R. O. (1997). Introduction: competing approaches to sustainability: Dimensions of Controversy. Flashpoints in Environmental Policymaking: Controversies in Achieving Sustainabiliw, 1-26.

Willard, B. (2012). The new sustainability advantage: seven business case benefits of a triple bottom line. New Society Publishers.

York, J. G. (2009). Pragmatic sustainability: Translating environmental ethics into competitive advantage. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 97-109.

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 588 588 70
PDF Downloads 673 673 62