During the last few decades, the search for sustainability has experienced a tremendous momentum, encompassing all the levels of the global system. Fuelled by complex (both proactive and reactive) motivators, the process has surpassed the characteristics of an intellectual endeavor – more preoccupied by idealist goals, and less focused on the actual means to achieve them – and has proved that it can successfully be transposed into the corporate real world – of decision making, objective assessment, and relentless scrutiny. The paper aims to (broadly) explore the world of the most sustainable corporations – based on a descriptive (factual and dynamic) analysis of Corporate Knight’s annual rankings (2016-2018) of the Most Sustainable Corporations – in order to: (a). determine (by comparing and contrasting) the main features these organizations – able to transform the fuzzy concept of corporate sustainability into a coherent reality – display; and (b). set the premises for future (narrower) researches – aiming to explain the “how-s” behind the design, development and implementation of the strategies these corporations follow in their search for (sustainable) competitiveness.
Ditlev Simonsen, C. D., & Midttun, A. (2011). What motivates managers to pursue corporate responsibility? A survey among key stakeholders. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(1), 25-38.
Engardio, P., Capell, K., Carey, J., & Hall, K. (2007). Beyond the green corporation: Imagine a world in which eco-friendly and socially responsible practices actually help a company’s bottom line. It’s closer than you think. Business Week, 4019, 50.
Epstein, M. J., & Buhovac, A. R. (2014). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002). The sustainability balanced scorecard–linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business strategy and the Environment, 11(5), 269-284.
Gianni, M., Gotzamani, K., & Tsiotras, G. (2017). Multiple perspectives on integrated management systems and corporate sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 1297-1311.
Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2010). Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: you can’t have your cake and eat it. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 217-229.
Haywood, L. K., & Van der Watt, C. (2016). Building resilience into business strategy, management and reporting: Principles and maturity tool to facilitate resilience in business, 2016. https://researchspace.csir.co.za.
Hubbard, G. (2009). Measuring Organizational Performance: Beyond the Triple Bottom Line. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(3), 177-191.
Ivory, S. B., & Brooks, S. B. (2018). Managing corporate sustainability with a paradoxical lens: Lessons from strategic agility. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 347-361.
Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., Hall, J. M., Jaeger, C. C., Lowe, I., ... & Faucheux, S. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292(5517), 641-642.
Lubin, D. A., & Esty, D. C. (2010). The Sustainability Imperative. Harvard Business Review, 88(5), 42-50.
Montiel, I., & Delgado-Ceballos, J. (2014). Defining and measuring corporate sustainability: Are we there yet?. Organization & Environment, 27(2), 113-139.
Nguyen, D. K., & Slater, S. F. (2010). Hitting the sustainability sweet spot: Having it all. Journal of Business Strategy, 31(3), 5-11.
Norton, B. G. (2005). Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. University of Chicago Press.
Pal, M., & Jenkins, J. J. (2014). Reimagining Sustainability: An Interrogation of the Corporate Knights’ Global 100. Environmental Communication, 8(3), 388-405.
Pinelli, M., & Maiolini, R. (2017). Strategies for Sustainable Development: Organizational Motivations, Stakeholders’ Expectations and Sustainability Agendas. Sustainable Development, 25(4), 288-298.
Popa, F., Guillermin, M., & Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2015). A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: From complex systems theory to reflexive science. Futures, 65, 45-56.