ISO 26000 – An Integrative Approach of Corporate Social Responsibility

Open access

Abstract

ISO 26000 represents a guidance on corporate social responsibility and it is, at the present time, one of the most important document on CSR in the world. Without being mandatory or regulated, ISO 26000 is focus on seven core subjects that have to be approached synergistic – governance, human right, labor, environment, business practices, consumer, and community – in order to achieve its goal. The present paper intends to present and analyze the seven core subjects of ISO 26000 from tow perspectives: by emphasizing the benefits of implementing the standard into the business strategy and by revealing the correlation between corporate social responsibility and sustainable development.

Balzarova, M. A., and Castka, P. (2012). Stakeholders’ influence and contribution to social standards development: The case of multiple stakeholder approach to ISO 26000 development. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 265-279.

Baron, D. (2001). Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Integrated Strategy, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, vol. 10, no. 1, 7-45.

Carroll, A. (1979). A three dimensional model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.

Castka, P., & Balzarova, M. A. (2007). A critical look on quality through CSR lenses: Key challenges stemming from the development of ISO 26000. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 24(7), 738-752.

Castka, P., & Balzarova, M. A. (2008). ISO 26000 and supply chains - On the diffusion of the social responsibility standard. International journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 274-286.

Castka, P., & Balzarova, M. A. (2008). Social responsibility standardization: Guidance or reinforcement through certification?. Human systems management, 27(3), 231-242.

Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 15, no. 1, 1-13.

Donaldson, L., and Davis, J.H. (1991), Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns, Australian Journal of Management, vol. 16 no. 1 49-64.

Donaldson, T., and Preston, L.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 1, 65-91.

Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits Milton The New York Times Magazine September 13, pp. 32-33, 122, 126.

Hahn, R. (2013). ISO 26000 and the standardization of strategic management processes for sustainability and corporate social responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(7), 442-455.

Hahn, R., and Weidtmann, C. (2016). Transnational Governance, Deliberative Democracy, and the Legitimacy of ISO 26000 Analyzing the Case of a Global Multistakeholder Process. Business & Society, 55(1), 90-129.

Harrison, J.S., and Freeman, R.E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, No. 5, 479-485.

Helms, W. S., Oliver, C., & Webb, K. (2012). Antecedents of settlement on a new institutional practice: Negotiation of the ISO 26000 standard on social responsibility. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1120-1145.

Husted, B.W. and de Jesus Salazar, J. (2006). Taking Friedman Seriously: Maximizing Profits and Social Performance, Journal of Management Studies, 43:1.

Jones, T.M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics, Academy of Management Review, 20, 2404-2437.

McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–27.

McWilliams, A., Siegel, D.S. and Wright, P.M. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications, (Guest Editors Introduction) Journal of Management Studies, 43:1, 1-18.

McWilliams, A., Van Fleet, D. D. and Cory, K. (2002). Raising rivals’ costs through political strategy: an extension of the resource-based theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 707–23.

Pojasek, R.B. (2011). ISO 26000 guidance on social responsibility. Environmental Quality Management 20.3 (2011): 85-93.

Schwartz, B., & Tilling, K. (2009). ISO-lating’corporate social responsibility in the organizational context: a dissenting interpretation of ISO 26000. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(5), 289-299.

Unruh et al. (2016). Investing for a sustainable future. Research Report, MIT Sloan Management Review and BCG.

Waldman, D., Siegel, D. and Javidan, M. (2004). CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Working paper, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 136 136 75
PDF Downloads 104 104 55