This paper proposes a measurement method for assessing the extent to which the XBRL digital standard eXtensible Business Reporting Language can assist firms in implementing their reporting when applying EMAS The EU Eco-Management and Audit Scheme. A specific survey based on the work of (Bunker et al., 2007), which uses Value Compatibility, was carried out at the most important firms in Southern Spain. Different sectors were involved in the study: public hospital, copper manufacturing facilities, petrochemical plant and pulp and renewable energy production. The results reveal some concordances between EMAS using XBRL as a reporting technology, and the cultural, organisational and technical working environment of the analysed firms, specifically those related to the Structural Dimension. By contrast, some discordance is highlighted related to the Practical Dimension. The paper proposes for the first time the application of the global financial standard XBRL for a non financial purpose like the widely accepted EMAS, to actual potential uses in real scenarios. The empirical research combined heavy industry with services, privately owned firms with public entities, private and public sector, in the analysis of this technology. The paper represents a necessary landmark for a subsequent longitudinal study.
Arndt, H. K., Isenmann, R., Brosowski, J., Thiessen, I., and Marx Gómez, J., 2006. Sustainability reporting using the extensible business reporting language (XBRL).. In K. Tochtermann and A. Scharl (Eds.), Managing environmental knowledge (pp. 75-82). Graz: Shaker Verlag.
Bonson, E., Cortijo, V., and Escobar, T., 2009. A Delphi Investigation to Explain the Voluntary Adoption of XBRL. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 9, 193-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.4192/1577-8517-v9_7
Bonson, E., Escobar, T., and Flores, F., 2011. BaselMapper: An experimental tool for managing operational risk in banks. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 6(1), 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJMSO.2011.042486
Boritz, J. E., Efendi, J., and Lim, J. H., 2017. The Impact of Senior Management Competencies on the Voluntary Adoption of an Innovative Technology. Journal of Information Systems, isys-51685. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/isys-51685
Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Frias-Aceituno, J., and Martinez-Ferrero, J., 2014. The role of media pressure on the disclosure of sustainability information by local governments. Online Information Review, 38(1), 114-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OIR-12-2012-0232
Flores, F., Bonson-Ponte, E., and Escobar-Rodriguez, T., 2006. Operational risk information system: A challenge for the banking sector. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 14(4), 383-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13581980610711153
Freeman, R. E., 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131-154.
Giordano, R., Passarella, G., Uricchio, V. F., and Vurro, M., 2007. Integrating conflict analysis and consensus reaching in a decision support system for water resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 84(2), 213-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.05.006
Hofstede, G., 1994. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival. New York: HarperCollins.
Hrebicek, J., Soukopova, J., Stencl, M., and Trenz, O., 2011. Integration of economic, environmental, social and corporate governance performance and reporting in enterprises. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 59(7), 157-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201159070157
Iraldo, F., Testa, F., and Frey, M., 2009. Is an environmental management system able to influence environmental and competitive performance? The case of the eco-management and audit scheme EMAS in the European union. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(16), 1444-1452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.05.013
Isenmann, R., 2009. Environmental Statements on the Internet-From a Mere EMAS Requirement to an On-line Environmental Communication Tool. In S. Schaltegger, M. Bennett, R. L. Burritt and C. Jasch (Eds.), Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production (pp. 103-121). Dordrecht: Springer.
Isenmann, R., Bey, C., and Welter, M., 2007. Online reporting for sustainability issues. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(7), 487-501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.597
Isenmann, R., and Gomez, M., 2009. Advanced corporate sustainability reporting–XBRL taxonomy for sustainability reports based on the G3-guidelines of the Global Reporting Initiative. Paper presented at the Towards e-Environment. European conference of the Czech Presidency of the Council of the EU, Prague.
Kolln, K., and Prakash, A., 2002. EMS-based environmental regimes as club goods: Examining variations in firm-level adoption of ISO 14001 and EMAS in UK, US and Germany. Policy Sciences, 35(1), 43-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1016071810725
La Torre, M., Valentinetti, D., Dumay, J., and Rea, M. A., 2018. Improving corporate disclosure through XBRL. An evidence-based taxonomy structure for integrated reporting. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(2), 338-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JIC-03-2016-0030
Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M., 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Mintzberg, H., 1989. Mintzberg on Management: Inside Our Strange World of Organizations. New York: Free Press.
Mora Gonzálbez, J., and Mora Rodríguez, M., 2012. XBRL and Integrated Reporting: the Spanish Accounting Association Taxonomy approach. The International journal of digital accounting research, 12, 59-91.
Mora Rodriguez, M., and Preist, C., 2016. The role of interoperability in sustainability decisions: the case of CDP. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on ICT for Sustainability ICT4S.
Nagabhatla, N., Padmanabhan, M., Kuhle, P., Vishnudas, S., Betz, L., and Niemeyer, B., 2015. LCLUC as an entry point for transdisciplinary research-Reflections from an agriculture land use change study in South Asia. Journal of Environmental Management, 148(8), 42-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.03.019
Roohani, S., Xianming, Z., Capozzoli, E. A., and Lamberton, B., 2010. Analysis of XBRL Literature: A Decade of Progress and Puzzle. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 10, 131-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.4192/1577-8517-v10_6
Salzmann, O., Ionescu-somers, A., and Steger, U., 2005. The Business Case for Corporate Sustainability: Literature Review and Research Options. European Management Journal, 23(1), 27-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.007
Schein, E. H., 1985. Organizational Culture and Leadership: A dynamic view. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Searcy, C., and Elkhawas, D., 2012. Corporate sustainability ratings: An investigation into how corporations use the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Cleaner Production, 35, 79-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.022
Stanić, B., 2015. The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Export of Dirty Industries in CEE Countries. Environmental economics and policy research providing information for decision making: Young scholars’ perspective. Praga: Litomysl Seminar Publishing.
Stuart, D., 2015. The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. Online Information Review, 39(2), 272-272.
Sumbal, M. S., Tsui, E., and See-to, E., 2017. Interrelationship between big data and knowledge management: An exploratory study in the oil and gas sector. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(1), 180-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2016-0262
Tomsky, B., and Manco, A., 2011. Managing a Green Giant: Sustainability Performance Management, a User Experience Perspective. In A. Marcus (Ed.), Design, User Experience, and Usability. Theory, Methods, Tools and Practice. Berlin: Springer.
Troshani, I., and Rao, S., 2007. Drivers and inhibitors to XBRL adoption: A qualitative approach to build a theory in under-researched areas. International Journal of E-Business Research, 3(4), 98-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jebr.2007100106
Unerman, J., 2000. Methodological issues - Reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(5), 667-681. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513570010353756
Valentinetti, D., and Rea, M., 2011. Adopting XBRL in Italy: Early evidence of fit between Italian GAAP Taxonomy and current reporting practices of non-listed companies. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 11, 45-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.4192/1577-8517-v11_3
Vasarhelyi, M. A., Chan, D. Y., and Krahel, J. P., 2012. Consequences of XBRL standardization on financial statement data. Journal of Information Systems, 26(1), 155-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/isys-10258
Wahba, H., 2008. Does the market value corporate environmental responsibility? An empirical examination. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(2), 89-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/csr.153