The relationship between quality of self-monitoring and glycemic control in romanian children with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Open access


Objectives: Optimal glycemic control is mandatory in diabetic children and adolescents for the prevention of diabetes complications, but it is difficult to be obtained due to a series of factors, including the limited availability of blood glucose self-monitoring tests. The aim of our study was to investigate the relationship between the number of daily self-monitoring tests and quality of glycemic control. Material and method: We enrolled 783 individuals previously diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and investigated the significance of differences in HbA1c values between groups with distinct number of blood glucose measurements at home for each age group. Results: We found significant improvements of glycemic control with the increase in the number of daily tests, with some particularities among the groups. Conclusions: Among other intrinsic and external factors, blood glucose selfmonitoring has an important role in obtaining a good glycemic control.

1. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulindependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 329:977-986, 1993.

2. Skyler JS. Diabetic complications. The importance of glucose control. Endocrinol Metab Clin of North Am 25:243-254, 1996.

3. International Diabetes Federation. Global IDF/ISPAD guideline for diabetes in childhood and adolescence. 2011.

4. Phillip M, Danne T, Shalitin S, Buckingham B, Laffel L. Use of continuous glucose monitoring in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 13:215-228, 2012.

5. Haller MJ, Stalvey MS, Silverstein JH. Predictors of control of diabetes: monitoring may be the key. J Pediatr 144:660-661, 2004.

6. Schneider S, Iannotti RJ, Nansel TR et al. Identification of distinct self-management styles of adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 30:1107-1112, 2007.

7. Hanas R, John G, International HbA Consensus Committee. 2010 consensus statement on the worldwide standardization of the Hemoglobin A1c measurement. Clin Chem 56:1362-1364, 2010.

8. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2009. Diabetes education in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 10[Suppl 12]: 51-57, 2009.

9. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes - 2012. Diabetes Care 35:S11-S63, 2012.

10. Șerban V, Timar B, Barna L, Lăcătușu A, Fiera F, Timar R. The value of HbA1c and the availability of self-monitoring in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus admitted to the “Cristian Șerban” Medical Center in Buziaș. Rom J Diabetes Nutr Metab Dis 19[Suppl 1]:40-41, 2012 (Abstract).

11. Dorchy H, Claes C, Verougstraete C. Risk factors of developing proliferative retinopathy in type 1 diabetic patients: role of BMI. Diabetes Care 25:798-799, 2002.

12. Stone ML, Craig ME, Chan AK et al. Natural history and risk factors for microalbuminuria in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a longitudinal study. Diabetes Care 29:2072-2077, 2006.

13. Koivisto VA, Stevens LK, Mattock M et al. Cardiovascular disease and its risk factors in IDDM in Europe. EURODIAB IDDM Complications Study Group. Diabetes Care 19:689-697, 1996.

14. Astrup AS, Tarnow L, Rossing P et al. Improved prognosis in type 1 diabetic patients with nephropathy: a prospective follow-up study. Kidney Int 68:1250-1257, 2005.

15. Weissberg-Benchell J, Wolpert H, Anderson BJ. Transitioning from pediatric to adult care. Diabetes Care 30:2441-2446, 2007.

16. Winkley K, Ismail K, Landau S, Eisler I. Psychological interventions to improve glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMJ 333:65-68, 2006.

Romanian Journal of Diabetes Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases

The Journal of Romanian Society of Diabetes Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.11

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.122
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.077


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 99 98 7
PDF Downloads 41 41 3