Segmenting CT images of bronchogenic carcinoma with bone metastases using PET intensity markers approach

Open access

Segmenting CT images of bronchogenic carcinoma with bone metastases using PET intensity markers approach

Background. The evolution of medical imaging plays a vital role in the management of patients with cancer. In oncology, the impact of PET/CT imaging has been contributing widely to the patient treatment by its large advantages over anatomical imaging from screening to staging. PET images provide the functional activity inside the body while CT images demonstrate the anatomical information. Hence, the existence of cancer cells can be recognized in PET image but since the structural location and position cannot be defined on PET images, we need to retrieve the information from CT images.

Methods. In this study, we highlight the localization of bronchogenic carcinoma by using high activity points on PET image as references to extract regions of interest on CT image. Once PET and CT images have been registered using cross correlation, coordinates of the candidate points from PET are fed into seeded region growing algorithm to define the boundary of lesion on CT. The region growing process continues until a significant change in bilinear pixel values is reached.

Results. The method has been tested over eleven images of a patient having bronchogenic carcinoma with bone metastases. The results show that the mean standard error for over segmented pixels is 33% while for the under segmented pixels is 3.4%.

Conclusions. Although very simple in implementation, region growing can result in good precision ROIs. The region growing method highly depends on where the growing process starts. Here, by using the data acquired from other modality, we tried to guide the segmentation process to achieve better segmentation results.

Shetty C, Lakhkar B, Gangadhar V, Ramachandran N. Changing pattern of bronchogenic carcinoma: a statistical variation or a reality? Indian J Radiol Imaging 2005; 15: 233-8.

De Wever W, Stroobants S, Coolen J, Verschakelen JA. Integrated PET/CT in the staging of nonsmall cell lung cancer: technical aspects and clinical integration. Eur Respir J 2009; 33: 201-12.

Kovac V, Smrdel U. Meta-analyses of clinical trials in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Minireview. Neoplasma 2004; 51: 334-40

Kim K, Kim KR, Sohn HY, Lee UY, Kim SK, Lee WY. The role of whole body bone scan in bronchogenic carcinoma. Yonsei Med J 1984; 25: 11-7.

Abe K, Sasaki M, Kuwabara Y, Koga H, Baba S, Hayashi K, et al. Comparison of 18FDG-PET with 99mTc-HMDP scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. Ann Nucl Med 2005; 19: 573-9.

Debevec L, Jerič T, Kovač V, Bitenc M, Sok M. Is there any progress in routine management of lung cancer patients? A comparative analysis of an institution in 1996 and 2006. Radiol Oncol 2009; 43: 47-53.

Guo H, Zhu H, Xi Y, Zhang B, Li L, Huang Y, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for patients with suspected recurrence from squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Nucl Med 2007; 48: 1251-8.

Miller JC, Fischman AJ, Aquino SL, Blake MA, Thrall JH, Lee SI. FDG-PET CT for tumor imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4: 256-9.

Goo JM, Im J, Do K, Yeo JS, Seo JB, Kim HY, et al. Pulmonary tuberculoma evaluated by means of FDG PET: findings in 10 cases. Radiology 2000; 216: 117-21.

Ting-lei Huang, Xue Bai. An improved algorithm for medical image segmentation. Genetic and evolutionary computing, 2008. WGEC '08. Second International Conference; 2008. p. 289-92.

Gonzalez RC, Woods RE, Eddins SL. Digital image processing using MATLAB. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River; 2003.

Rajer M, Kovač V. Malignant spinal cord compression. Radiol Oncol 2008; 42: 23-31.

Nestle U, Weber W, Hentschel M, Grosu AL. Biological imaging in radiation therapy: role of positron emission tomography. Phys Med Biol 2009; 54: R1-25.

Evans PM. Anatomical imaging for radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2008; 53: R151-91.

Rohren EM, Turkington TG, Coleman RE. Clinical applications of PET in oncology. Radiology 2004; 231: 305-32.

Beyer T, Townsend DW, Brun T, Kinahan PE, Charron M, Roddy R, et al. A Combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. J Nucl Med 2000; 41: 1369-79.

Townsend DW, Beyer T. A combined PET/CT scanner: the path to true image fusion. Br J Radiol 2002; 75: S24-30.

Lewis J. Fast normalized cross-correlation. Vision Interface 1995; 10: 120-3.

Hojjatoleslami SA, Kittler J. Region growing: a new approach. IEEE Trans Image Process 1998; 7: 1079-84.

Adams R, Bischof L. Seeded region growing. Pattern analysis and machine intelligence. IEEE Trans Image Process 1994; 3: 641-7.

Wan S, Higgins WE. Symmetric region growing. IEEE Trans Image Process 2003; 12: 1007-15.

Radiology and Oncology

The Journal of Association of Radiology and Oncology

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1,846
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1,923

CiteScore 2018: 1.94

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.651
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.867


Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 243 174 14
PDF Downloads 121 98 11