Open-earedness theory has repeatedly been confirmed on several populations including American, English, Dutch, German and Finnish people. Nonetheless the influence of cultural diversity on openness towards unfamiliar music has received little attention from researchers and this may create the possibility of adding essential modifications of Albert LeBlanc’s theory. Considering the contemporary context, people’s migration towards economic developed countries becomes a phenomenon with great implications related to the progress of social and cultural characteristics of any national context. Researching the openearedness of people which have been exposed not only to their native culture but also to the adopted one (due to financial necessities) may reveal a series of useful aspects for the intercultural field (by disclosing new ways to promote the tolerance towards cultural diversity) and also for the educational field (by describing new strategies of learning in a context of adaptation to an unfamiliar musical space). The present article analyses a series of previous experiments that monitored the way different social categories integrated in cultural communities different from their own assimilate or not the elements of the adopted country into their musical identity. The present analysis has educational implications related to the ways students may develop the preference for unfamiliar music.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Hargreaves D. Comber C. & Colley A. (1995). Effects of age gender and training on musical preferences of British secondary school students. Journal of Research in Music Education 43(3) 242-250.
2. Kopiez R. & Lehmann M. (2008). The „open-earedness” hypothesis and the development of age-related aesthetic reactions to music in elementary school children. British Journal of Music Education 25(2) 121-138.
3. LeBlanc A. (1980). Outline of a proposed model of sources of variation in musical taste. The Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education 61 29-34.
4. LeBlanc A. Sims E. Siivola C. & Obert M. (1996). Music style preferences of different age listeners. Journal of Research in Music Education 44(1) 49-59.
5. LeBlanc A. Sims W. Malin S. & Sherrill C. (1992). Relationship between humor perceived in music and preferences of different-age listeners. Journal of Research in Music Education 40(4) 269-282.
6. Morrison S.J. Demorest S. & Stambaugh L. (2008). Enculturation effects in music cognition. The role of age and music complexity. Journal of Research in Music Education 56(2) 118-129.
7. Morrison S.J. Demorest S. Campbell P.S. Bartolome S. & Roberts C. (2013). Effect of intensive instruction on elementary students’ memory for culturally unfamiliar music. Journal of Research in Music Education 60(4) 363-374.
8. Sakai W. (2011). Music preference and family language background: A computersupported study of children’s listening behavior in the context of migration. Journal of Research in Music Education 59(2) 174-195.
9. Wong P. Roy A. & Margulis E. (2009). Bimusicalism: The implicit dual enculturation of cognitive and affective systems. Music Perception 27(2) 81-88.
10. McCrary J. (2000). Ethnic majority/minority status: Children’ interactions and affective responses to music. Journal of Research in Music Education 48(3) 249-261.
11. Abril C. & Flowers P. (2007). Attention preference and identity in music listening by middle school students of different linguistic backgrounds. Journal of Research in Music Education 55(3) 204-219.