The optimal rate of return for defined contribution pension systems in a stochastic framework

Open access

Abstract

This paper deals with the problem of the optimal rate of return to be paid by a defined contribution pension system to its participants’ savings, namely the rate that achieves the goal of the most favorable returns on their contributions jointly with the sustainability of the pension system.

We consider defined contribution pension systems provided with a funded component, and for their study we use the “theory of the logical sustainability of pension systems” already developed in several previous works. In this paper, we focus on pension systems in a demographically stable state, whereas the productivity of the active participants and the financial rate of return on the pension system’s fund, rates that constitute the “ingredients” of the optimal rate of return on contributions, are modeled by two stochastic processes.

We show that the decisional rule defining the optimal rate of return on contributions is optimal in the sense that it is effective in terms of sustainability, and also efficient in the sense that if the system pays to its participants’ contributions a rate of return that is either higher or lower than the one provided by the rule, then the pension system becomes unsustainable or overcapitalized, respectively.

[1] J. F. Jimeno, J. A. Rojas, S. Puente, Modelling the impact of aging on social security expenditures, Economic Modelling 25 (2) (2008) 201–224.

[2] D. A. Robalino, A. Bodor, On the financial sustainability of earnings-related pension schemes with ‘pay-as-you-go’ financing and the role of government-indexed bonds, Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 8 (02) (2009) 153–187.

[3] H. Wang, B. Koo, C. O’Hare, Retirement planning in the light of changing demographics, Economic Modelling 52 (2016) 749–763.

[4] A. J. Auerbach, R. Lee, Welfare and generational equity in sustainable unfunded pension systems, Journal of Public Economics 95 (1) (2011) 16–27.

[5] M. Angrisani, A. Attias, S. Bianchi, Z. Varga, Sustainability of a pay-as-you-go pension system by dynamic immigration control, Applied Mathematics and Computation 219 (5) (2012) 2442–2452.

[6] R. Holzmann, E. E. Palmer, et al., Pension reform: Issues and prospects for non-financial defined contribution (NDC) schemes, World Bank Publications, 2006.

[7] R. Holzmann, E. Palmer, D. Robalino, Nonfinancial Defined Contribution Pension Schemes in a Changing Pension World: Volume 2, Gender, Politics, and Financial Stability, Vol. 2, World Bank Publications, 2012.

[8] J. B. Williamson, M. Price, C. Shen, Pension policy in China, Singapore, and South Korea: An assessment of the potential value of the notional defined contribution model, Journal of Aging Studies 26 (1) (2012) 79–89.

[9] O. Settergren, The automatic balance mechanism of the swedish pension system, Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter 4 (2001) 2001.

[10] C. Vidal-Meliá, M. C. Boado-Penas, O. Settergren, Automatic balance mechanisms in pay-as-you-go pension systems, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Issues and Practice 34 (2) (2009) 287–317.

[11] P. A. Samuelson, An exact consumption-loan model of interest with or without the social contrivance of money, The Journal of Political Economy (1958) 467–482.

[12] H. Aaron, The social insurance paradox, Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science/Revue canadienne de economiques et science politique 32 (03) (1966) 371–374.

[13] O. Settergren, B. D. Mikula, The rate of return of pay-as-you-go pension systems: a more exact consumption-loan model of interest, Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 4 (02) (2005) 115–138.

[14] R. Lee, Discussion of ‘The Rate of Return of Pay As You Go Pension Systems: A More Exact Consumption-Loan Model of Interest’, in: Pension Reform: Issues and Prospects for Non-Financial Defined Contribution (NDC) Schemes, The World Bank, Washington, 2006, pp. 143–147.

[15] M. Bielecki, K. Goraus, J. Hagemejer, K. Makarski, J. Tyrowicz, Small assumptions (can) have a large bearing: evaluating pension system reforms with olg models, Economic Modelling 48 (2015) 210–221.

[16] A. J. Auerbach, R. Lee, Notional defined contribution pension systems in a stochastic context: Design and stability, in: Social Security Policy in a Changing Environment, University of Chicago Press, 2009, pp. 43–68.

[17] M. Angrisani, Funded and unfunded systems: two ends of the same stick, 28th International Congress of Actuaries PARIS: ICA.

[18] M. Angrisani, The logical sustainability of the pension system, Pure Mathemathics and Applications 19 (2008) 67–81.

[19] M. Angrisani, C. Di Palo, A Necessary Sustainability Condition for partially Funded Pension Systems, in: MIC 2011: Managing Sustainability? Proceedings of the 12thInternational Conference, Portorož, 23–26 November 2011 [Selected Papers], University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, 2011, pp. 773–788.

[20] M. Angrisani, C. Di Palo, An extension of Aaron’s sustainable rate of return to partially funded pension systems, International Journal of Sustainable Economy 4 (3) (2012) 213–233.

[21] M. Angrisani, C. Di Palo, Managing the baby boomer demographic wave in defined contribution pension systems, Politica economica-Journal of Economic Policy (PEJEP) 30 (1) (2014) 51–72.

[22] M. Angrisani, C. Di Palo, Controlling a demographic wave in defined contribution pension systems, Pure Mathematics and Applications.

[23] O. Vasicek, An equilibrium characterization of the term structure, Journal of Financial Economics 5 (2) (1977) 177–188.

[24] A. K. Dixit, R. S. Pindyck, Investment under uncertainty, Princeton university press, 1994.

[25] Human Mortality Database, Data on mortality, Tech. rep., University of California, Berkeley (USA) and Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Germany). Available at www.humanmortality.de ((data downloaded 2016)). URL http://www.humanmortality.de

[26] Swedish Pensions Agency, Orange Report: Annual Report of the Swedish Pension System 2013, Tech. rep., Swedish Pensions Agency (2014).

Journal Information


Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2017: 0.11

Target Group

researchers in the fields of algebra and theoretical computer science

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 141 141 17
PDF Downloads 77 77 8