Students’ Attitude Towards Arabic Language Varieties: The Case of the Fuṣḥā Arabic

Open access


Arabic speaking countries live in diglossic communities. This is where two or more varieties of a language are used by the same speech community. This paper examines students’ attitude towards Arabic language varieties. It focuses mainly on Egyptian students’ attitude towards the fuṣḥā on one hand and the Egyptian Arabic (EA) variety on the other. A survey of fifty university students from the American University in Cairo and Ain Shams University, Cairo was conducted using the questionnaire instrument. The data was analysed descriptively. The study reveals that Egyptian students have a slightly positive attitude towards the fuṣḥā Arabic. Notwithstanding, they tend to exhibit positive affective and behavioural tendencies towards EA. Based on this, the study proposes that language planners and for that matter, Arab states should adopt a vibrant ‘status planning’, whereby fuṣḥā is properly recognized and widely used in official and state institutions and functions.

Abdel-Jawad, H. (1981). Lexical and phonological variation in spoken Arabic in Amman. [PhD thesis]. Philadelphia: University Pennsylvania.

Al-Mamari, H. (2011). Arabic diglossia and Arabic as a foreign language: The perception of students in world learning Oman center. Capstone Collection, Paper No. 2437. Brattleboro, VT: School for International Training Graduate Institute. Retrieved from [08.07.2017].

Assaf, A. (2001). Palestinian students’ attitudes towards modern standard Arabic and Palestinian city Arabic. RELC Journal, 32 (2), 45-62.

Badawi, S. (1973). Mustawayaat al-arabiyya al-muasira fii Misr. Cairo: Dar al- Maarif.

Bassiouney, R. (2009). Arabic Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Dakwar, R. K. (2005). Children's attitudes towards the diglossic situation in Arabic and its impact on learning. In Zakharia, Z., & Arnstein, T. (Eds.), Languages, Communities and Education (pp. 75-86). New York: Society for International Education; Columbia University.

Dornyei, Z. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: construction, administration and processing. New York: Routledge.

Eckert, P. (1999). Linguistic variation as social practice: the linguistic construction of identity. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.

Ferguson, C. A. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 15 (2), 325-340.

Fishman, J. A. (1971). Sociolinguistics: A brief introduction. Rowley: Newbury House publishers.

Gardner, R. C., & Gliksman, L. (1982). On “Gardner on affect”: A discussion of validity as it relates to the attitude/motivation test battery: a response from Gardner. Language Learning, 32 (1), 191-200. DOI:

Haeri, N. (1997). The reproduction of symbolic capital: language, state, and class in Egypt. Current Anthropology, 38 (1), 795-805.

Haeri, N. (2000). Form and ideology: Arabic sociolinguistics and beyond. Annual Review of Antropology, 29 (1), 61-87.

Holes, C. (2004). Modern Arabic: structures, functions, and varieties. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

Kaye, A. S. (1998). Understanding Arabic: essays in contemporary linguistics in honor of El-Said Badawi. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 118 (3), 419.

Kachru, B. B. (1992). The second diaspora of English. In Machan, T., & Scott, C. (Eds.), English in its Social Contexts: essays in historical linguistics (pp. 230-252). New York: Oxford University Press.

Labov, W. (1982). Building on empirical foundations. In Lehmann, W., & Malkiel, Y. (Eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics, current issues in linguistic theory (pp. 17-92). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Schaub, M. (2000). English in the Arab republic of Egypt. World Englishes, 19, (2), 225-238.

Tignor, R. (1966). Modernization and British colonial rule in Egypt, 1882-1914. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Soliman, A. (2008). The changing role of Arabic in religious discourse: a sociolinguistic study of Egyptian Arabic. [PhD thesis]. Indiana, PA: Indiana University of Pennsylvania.

Ryding, K. C. (2005). A reference modern standard Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Versteegh, K. (2001). The Arabic language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Wahba, K. M. (1996). Linguistic variation in Alexandrian Arabic: the feature of emphasis. In Elgibali, A., & Badawi, E. (Eds.), Understanding Arabic: essays in contemporary Arabic linguistics in honor of El-Said Badawi (pp. 103-125). Cairo: American University in Cairo Press.

Wardhaugh, R. (2010). An introduction to sociolinguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley- Blackwell.

Wenden, A. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy. London: Prentice Hall.

Zughoul, M. R. (1980). Diglossia in Arabic: investigating solutions. Anthropological Linguistics, 22 (5), 201-217.

Zughoul, M. R., & Taminian, L. (1984). The linguistic attitude of Arab university students: factoral sturucture and intervening variables. The Journal of the Sociology of Language 50, 150-179.

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 706 706 97
PDF Downloads 428 428 73