Influence of Different Training Systems on the Beginning of Domestic Plum Production and Yield

Open access


All growers prefer to obtain a first harvest as soon as possible. The aim of this study was to identify an effective tree training system for new Latvian plum cultivars, which provides the highest yield and fruit quality. The trial was established in 2012 at the Institute of Horticulture (formerly Latvia State Institute of Fruit-Growing) and included cultivars ‘Ance’, ‘Adelyn’, and ‘Sonora’; and the controls ‘Victoria’ and ‘Jubileum’. Planting distances were 4 × 2.5 m, and the rootstock was Prunus cerasifera. Tree training was done using four systems: two systems with branch bending (Heka espalier and spindle); and two systems without bending (standard (round) and flat crown). Evaluation of average fruit weight and yield per trunk cross section area (TCSA) was done from 2015 to 2017. The Heka espalier and spindle systems had first yield in 2015, but systems without bending had first yield only in 2016. Average yield per TCSA was significantly higher for the Heka espalier system (0.49 kg·cm−2) than for the spindle system (0.24 kg·cm−2), standard crown system (0.17 kg·cm−2), and flat crown system (0.30 kg·cm−2). Cultivar ‘Victoria’ had the highest yield among all systems. Average fruit size showed the same results: the biggest fruits were obtained with the Heka espalier system, and the smallest for systems without bending in the standard crown.

Dēķena, D., Jānes, H., Alsiņa, I., Lepse, L. (2014). Influence of plum rootstocks on the content of reducing sugarsin the annual shoots of cultivar ‘Kubanskaja Kometa’. Proc. Latv. Univ. Agr., 32 (327), 9–16.

Gonda, I. (2006). The role of pruning in the intensification of plum production. J. Hort. Sci., 12 (3), 83–86.

Grāvīte, I., Kaufmane, E. (2016). Influence of calcium and boron on fluorescence parameters in domestic plums. Acta Hortic., 1130, 511–517.

Lanar, L., Meszaros, M., Namestek, J., Kosina, J. (2018). Early performance of three plum cultivars on different rootstocks in non-irrigated orchard. Acta Hortic., 1228, 301–305.

Lanauskas, J., Uselis, N., Kviklys, D., Gravite, I., Kaufmane, E., Rubauskis, E. (2018). Influence of rootstock on plum trees performance during the early years after grafting. Acta Hortic., 1228, 293–300.

Mask, P., Powell, A., Dozier, W., Williams, D., Himelrick, D. (2010). Training and Pruning Tree Fruits. Alabama Cooperative Extension system. Available at: (accessed 01.04.2019).

Meland, M. (2005). High density planting systems of European plums — the effect of growth and productivity of three cultivars after nine years. Acta Agric. Scand., 55, 51–57.

Mika, A., Buler, Z. and Chlebowska, D. (1998). The effect of training systems and planting density on growth and fruiting of plum trees grafted on two rootstocks. Acta Hortic., 478, 107–112.

Preston, A. P., Beryl Beakbane, A. (1974). Pruning experiments with Victoria plum. J. Hort. Sci., 49, 343–348.

Journal Information

CiteScore 2018: 0.3

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.137
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.192


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 75 75 5
PDF Downloads 58 58 7