The Aftereffects of Müller-Lyer and Ponzo Illusions: Differences Revealed in Sensorimotor Domain

Open access

Abstract

Either effects or aftereffects of visual illusions are well studied at the visual domain while there are few studies of aftereffects at the motor tasks such as grasping or pointing at the illusory. The aftereffects of Müller-Lyer and Ponzo illusions in the sensorimotor domain were studied. We used four illusions: two versions of Müller-Lyer illusions (upper/bottom shafts appear longer) and two versions of Ponzo illusions (classical and inverted, upper/bottom shafts appear longer). They were presented to four experimental groups, each type to one of the groups. A fifth group was shown neutral stimuli (two horizontal lines, one under another). At first, one of the above described stimuli was presented ten times. Then, for testing the aftereffect, the neutral stimuli were presented thirty times. After the disappearance of each stimulus, the participant moved his/her right hand across the touch screen along its upper and lower shafts. The participants of all experimental groups experienced significant illusions, but only the classical Ponzo illusion caused significant long-time assimilative aftereffect. These results reveal the existence of an illusory aftereffect in the sensorimotor domain. Moreover, it depends on the type of visual illusion, thereby supporting the hypothesis of origin of the different visual illusions at different levels of the visual system.

Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J. F., Goodale, M. A. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Curr. Biol., 5 (6), 679-685.

Bjalava, I. T. (1966). Psychology of Set and Cybernetics. [Бжалава, И. T. Психология установки и кибернетика). Nauka, Moscow. 250 рр. (in Russian).

Bruno, N. (2001). When does action resist visual illusions? Trends Cogn. Sci., 5 (9), 379-382.

Cañal-Bruland, R., van der Meer, Y., Moerman, J. Can visual illusions be used to facilitate sport skill learning? J. Motor Behav., 48, 385-389.

Carey, D. (2001). Do action systems resist visual illusions? Trends Cogn. Sci., 5 (3), 109-113.

Chauvel, G., Wulf, G., Maquestiaux, F. (2015). Visual illusions can facilitate sport skill learning. Psychonomic Bull. Rev., 22, 717-721.

Coren, S., Girgus, J. S., Erlichman, H., Hakstian, A. R. (1976). An empirical taxonomy of visual illusions. Percept. Psychophys., 20 (2), 129-137.

Crawford, L. E., Huttenlocher, J., Engebretson, P. H. (2000). Category effects on estimates of stimuli: Perception or reconstruction? Psychol. Sci., 11 (4), 280-284.

Deręgowski, J. B. (2015). Illusions within an illusion. Perception, 44 (12), 1416-1421.

Gentaz, E., Hatwell, Y. (2004). Geometrical haptic illusions: The role of exploration in the Müller-Lyer, vertical-horizontal, and Delboeuf illusions. Psychonomic Bull. Rev., 11 (1), 31-40.

Gregory, R. L. (2009). Seeing Through Illusions. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 357 pp.

Karpinskaia, V., Lyakhovetskii, V. (2013). The sensorimotor evaluation of perceptual illusions. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 86, 323-327.

Karpinskaia, V., Lyakhovetskii, V. (2014). The differences in the sensori¬motor estimation of the Ponzo and Mbller-Lyer illusions [Карпинская, В., Ляховецкий, В. Различия в сенсомоторной оценке иллюзий Понзо и Мюллера-Лайера]. Psiklwlogicheskie Issledovaniya [Психологические исследования), 7 (38), 3 (in Russian).

Karpinskaia, V., Lyakhovetskii, V., Allakhverdov, V., Shilov, Y. (2016). The peculiarities of perceptual set in sensorimotor illusions. Lecture Notes Comp. Sci., 9719, 706-711.

Kasatov, A. P., Obvinceva, A. V. (2001). Qualitative features of perceptual set, measured by estimation of the magnitude, and crossmodal selection [Касатов, А. П., Обвинцева, А. В. Качественные особенности проявления эффекта установки, измеренного методами оценки величины и кроссмодального подбора]. Psychol. Bull. Ural State Univ. [Психологический вестник Уральского государственного универси¬тета), No. 2, 163-169 (in Russian).

Kostandov, E. A., Kurova, N. S., Cheremushkin E. A., Iakovenko, I. A. (1998). The role of unconscious sets formed on the basis of the percep¬tion of concrete visual stimuli and of illusory representations in con¬scious cognitive activity [Костандов, Э. А., Курова, H. С., Черемушкин, E.A., Яковенко, И. А. Роль неосознаваемых установок, формируемых на основе восприятия конкретных зрительных стимулов и иллюзорных предстаатений, в сознательной когнитивной деятельности]. Zhournal Vysshei Nervnoi Deiatelnosti im. I. P. Pavlova [Журнал высшей нервной деятельности им. И. П. Павлова), 48 (3), 438-448 (in Rus¬sian).

Kostandov, Е. А. (1999) Foimation of the perceptual set on the basis of il¬lusory representations and at perception of concrete visual stimuli [Костандов, Э. А. Формирование установки на основе иллюзорных предстаатений и при восприятии конкретных зрительных стимулов]. Human Physiol. [Физиология человека), 25 (1), 5-14 (in Russian).

Human Physiol. [Ôèçèîëîãèÿ ÷åëîâåêà], 25 (1), 5-14 (in Russian).

Leontiev, A. N., Zaporozhets, A. V. (1945) The Restoration of Movements. [Леонтьев, A. H., Запорожец, А. В. Восстановление движений). Sovetskaya nauka, Moscow. 231 pp. (in Russian).

Milner, D., Goodale, M. (1995). Visual Brain in Action. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 310 pp.

Morgan, M. J., Hole, G. J., Glennerster, A. (1990). Biases and sensitivities in geometrical illusions. Vis. Res., 30 (11), 1793-1810.

Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9 (1), 97-113.

Piaget, J., Lambercier, M. (1944). Recherches sur le développement des perceptions: V. Essai sur un effet d’ “Einstellung” survenant au cours de perceptions visuelles, successives (effet Usnadze). Arch. Psychol., 30, 139-196 (in French).

Piaget, J., Fress, P. (1963). Traité de psychologie expérimentale, 6, Perpception. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris. 210 pp. (in French).

Pollack, R. H. (1964). Simultaneous and successive presentation of elements of the Müller-Lyer figure and chronological age. Percept. Motor Skills, 19, 303-310.

Shoshina, I. L, Perevozchikova, I. N., Konkina, S. A., Pronin, S. V., Shelepin, Iu. E., Bendera, A. P. (2011). Features of perception of length of segments under conditions of Ponzo and Muller-Lyer illusions in schizophrenia [Шошина, И. И., Перевозчикова, И. Н., Конкина, С. А., Пронин, С. В., Шелепин, Ю. Е., Бендера, А. П. Особенности восприятия длины отрезков в условиях иллюзии Понцо и Мюллера- Лайера при шизофрении]. Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deiat. Im. 1. P. Pavlova [Ж. Высш. Нерв. Деят. им И. П. Павлова], 61 (6), 697-705 (in Russian).

Valerjev, P., Gulan, T. (2013). The role of context in Müller-Lyer illusion: The case of negative Müller-Lyer illusion. Rev. Psychol., 20, 29-36.

Wagner, D. A. (1977). Ontogeny of the Ponzo illusion: Effects of age, schooling, and environment. Int. J. Psychol., 12 (3), 161-176.

Witt, J. K., Linkenauger, S. A., Proffitt, D. R. (2012). Get me out of this slump! Visual illusions improve sports performance. Psychol. Sci., 23 (4), 397-399.

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.22

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.127
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.211

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 427 422 26
PDF Downloads 227 226 18