The aim of the study was to determine the suitability of growing plum cultivars and hybrids of German origin in Latvian conditions. In the trial the plum cultivars and hybrids were planted at the Latvia State Institute of Fruit Growing (now, Institute of Horticulture) in spring 2008. Six W. Hartmann genotypes (cultivars ‘Tipala’, ‘Tegera’ and ‘Haganta’, and hybrids H-5102, H-3753, and H-3690) from Hohenheim University were included in the study. Prunus cerasifera was used as rootstock. The parameters evaluated were: beginning of flowering, ripening time, average yield (kg per tree), cumulative yield (kg), and average fruit weight from 2012 to 2016, and content of soluble solids from 2014 to 2016. In addition, self-fertility was evaluated in 2015 and 2016 for three cultivars and one hybrid. The winter of 2010/2011 was unfavourable, as plum orchards and most plum cultivars in Latvia suffered winter damage, but cultivars and hybrids in the trial were without damages. Significant damages were not observed in further years. Average flowering time in the four-year period for all cultivars and hybrids was the 1st or 2nd decade of May, harvest time was from the 1st decade of August to the 3rd decade of September. The earliest was hybrid H-3690, and the latest was cv.’Haganta’. The most productive was hybrid H-3690, which gave 42 kg in the 3rd year of yield and had the most rapid rise in yields. ‘Haganta’ had the biggest fruits (50 to 60 g) and highest content of soluble solids (17-18 Brix%). Self-fertility level was 40% for ‘Tegera’, 17.4% for ‘Haganta’, 14.5% for H-3690 and 0% for ‘Tipala’. Evaluation of all analysed parameters showed that ‘Tegera’ could be recommended for Latvian growers thanks to good winter hardiness in the research period. ‘Haganta’ is recommended only for warmer regions in Latvia. Hybrid H-3690 will potentially be useful for Latvian growers.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Anonymous (2006). World Reference Base. Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/a-a0510e.pdf (accessed 25 May 2017).
Botu, M., Mitra Amza, M., Botu, I., Papachatzis, A. (2013). European Plum (Prunus domestica L.) Cultural systems trial. Acta Hort., 985, 169-173.
Butac, M., Bozhkova, V., Zhivondov, A., Milosevic, N., Bellini, E., Nencetti, V., Blazek, J., Balsemin, E., Lafarque, B., Kaufmane, E., Gravite, I., Vasiljeva, M., Pintea, M., Juraveli, A., Webster, T., Hjalmarsson, I., Trajkovski, V., Hjelthes, S. H., Lakatos, T. (2013). Overview of plum breeding in Europe. Acta Hort., 981, 91-98.
Dragoyski, I., Minev, H., Dinkova, H., Stoyanova, T., Minkov, P. (2010). Evaluation of some introduced plum cultivars in RIMSA Troyan. Acta Hort., 874, 311-315.
Hartmann, W., Lichtenegger, L., Nuemüller, M. (2012). Hypersensitivity in plum breeding: New results. Acta Hort. 968, 41-46.
Hartmann, W., Nuemüller, M. (2009). Plum breeding. In: Breeding Plantation Tree Crops: Temperate Species. Jain, S. M., Priyadarshan, P. M. (eds.). Springer, pp.161-232.
Kārkliņš, A., Gemste, I., Meþals, H., Nikodemus, O., Skujâns, R. (2009). Latvijas augðòu noteicçjs [Taxonomy of Latvian Soils]. Latvijas Lauksaimniecîbas universitâte, Jelgava. 240 lpp. (in Latvian).
Kārkliņš, J., Skrīvele, M., Kaufmane, E., Ikase, L. (2007). Plûmju ðíirnes. Latvijas augïu koku pomoloìija [Plum cultivars. Latvian Pomology]. Reneprint, Rîga. 204 lpp. (in Latvian).
Kaufmane, E., Gravite, I.,Trajkovski, V. (2012). Results of Latvian breeding programme. Acta Hort., 968, 55-60.
Kaufmane, E., Trajkovski, V., Lacis, G., Ikase, L. (2002). Evaluation and characterisation of plum genetic resources in Sweden and Latvia. Acta Hort., 577, 207-215.
Klaas, L., Jänes, H., Kahu, K., Haak, E. (2006). The effect of different propagation methods on the yield and fruit mass of plums. Latvian J. Agron., No. 9, 45-48.
Koskela, E., Kemp, H., Dieren, M. C. A. (2010). Flowering and pollination studies with European plum (Prunus domestica L.) cultivars. Acta Hort., 874, 193-201.
Miloševič, N., Milinkoviè, V., Mitrovič, M., Miloševič, T. (2012). Productive traits of some newly introduced plum cultivars grown under environmental conditions of Cacak (Western Serbia). Acta Hort., 968, 87-91.
Skrīvele, M., Kaufmane, E., Strautiņa, S., Ikase, L., Ruisa, S., Rubauskis, E., Blukmanis, M., Segliòa, D. (2008). Overview of fruit and berry growing in Latvia. In: Proceedings of International Scientific Conference „Sustainable Fruit Growing: From Plant to Product”, Jûrmala-Dobele, Latvia, 28-31 May 2008. State Institute of Fruit-Growing, pp. 5-14.
Vangdal, E., Døving, A., Måge, F. (2007a). The fruit quality of plums (Prunus domestica L.) as related to yield and climatic conditions. Acta Hort., 734, 425-429.
Vangdal, E., Flatland, S., Hjeltnes, S. H., Sivertsen, H. (2007b). Consumers` preferences for new plum cultivars (Prunus domestica L.). Acta Hort., 734, 169-172.
Vangdal, E., Flatland, S., Lunde Knutsen, I., Larsen, H. (2012). Factors affecting storability and shelf life in plums (Prunus domestica L.). Acta Hort., 968, 197-203.
Wertheim, S. J. (1996). Method for cross pollination and flowering assessment and their interpretation. Acta Hort., 423, 237-243.
Wertheim, S. J., Schmidt, H. (2005). Flowering, pollination and fruit set. In: Fundamentals of Temperate Zone Tree Fruit Production. Tromp, J., Webster, A. D., Wertheim, S. J. (eds.). Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 216-239.