Experimental clues in favor of a generalized norm of reciprocity

Open access


The norm of reciprocity (Gouldner, 1960) has only been considered and experimentally demonstrated between two individuals. However, comments from several authors invite the consideration of an expanded form of this norm. 120 passersby, randomly assigned to 3 conditions, were asked to watch a confederate’s belongings. Depending on the condition, they had either previously been given a gift or not. In addition, the gift was offered by either the confederate making the target request or by a second confederate, not initially involved. First, results show that passersby are significantly more likely to comply with the target request if they were offered a gift than if they weren’t no matter who the confederate was. Second, the confederate offering the gift gets significantly more compliance than the one not initially involved. Results are discussed in terms of self-presentation theory (Pendleton & Batson, 1979), internalization of norm (Schwartz & Howard, 1981) and positive mood induction (Isen & Al, 1978).

Batson, C.D., Coke, J.S., Chard, F., Smith, D., & Taliaferro, A. (1979). Generality of the “glow of goodwill”: The effect of mood on helping and information acquisition. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42, 176-179.

Baumeister, R.F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3-26.

Berkowitz, L., & Daniels, L.R. (1963). Responsibility and dependency. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 429-436.

Berkowitz, L., & Daniels, L.R. (1964). Affecting the salience of the social responsibility norm: Effects of past help on the response to dependency relationships. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 275-281.

Boster, F.J., Fediuk, T.A., & Kotowski, M.J. (2001). The effectiveness of an altruistic appeal in the presence and absence of favors. Communication Monographs, 68, 340-346.

Burger, J.M., Ehrlichman, A.M., Raymond, N.C., Ishikawa, J.M., & Sandoval, J. (2006) Reciprocal favor exchangeand compliance. Social Infl uence, 1, 169-184.

Burger, J.M., Horita, M., Kinoshita, L., Roberts, K., & Vera, C. (1997). Effects of time on the norm of reciprocity. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 91-100.

Burger, J.M., Sanchez, J., Imberi, J.E., & Grande, L.R. (2009). The norm of reciprocity as an internalized social norm: Returning favors even when no one fi nds out. Social Infl uence, 4, 11-17.

Cialdini, R B., (2004). Infl uence et Manipulation. Paris, First Clark & Waddell, 1986

Cialdini, R.B., Vincent, J.E., Lewis, S.K., Catalan, J., Wheeler, D., & Darby, B.L. (1975). Reciprocal Concessions Procedure for Inducing Compliance: The door-in the face Technique. Journal of Personnality and Social Psychology, 31, 206-215.

Diekmann, A. (2004). The power of reciprocity: Fairness, reciprocity, and stakes in variants of the dictator game. Journal of confl ict resolution, 48, 487-505.

Dillard, J.P., Hunter, J.E., & Burgoon, M. (1984). Sequential-request persuasive strategies. Human Communication Research, 10, 461-488.

Dovidio, J.F., Piliavin, J.A., Schroeder, D.A., & Penner, L.A. (2006). The Social Psychology of Prosocial Behavior. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Goranson, R.E., & Berkowitz, L. (1966). Reciprocity and responsibility reactions to prior help. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 227-232.

Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.

Greenberg, A.E. (2014). On the complementarity of prosocial norms: The case of restaurant tipping during the holidays. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 97, 103-112.

Greenglass, E.R. (1969). Effect of prior help and hindrance on willingness to help another: reciprocity or social responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 11, 224-231.

Guéguen, N., & de Gail, M.A. (2003). The effect of smiling on helping behavior: Smiling and Good Samaritan behavior. Communication Reports, 16, 133-140.

Harris, M.B., & Smith, R.J. (1975). Mood and Helping. The Journal of Psychology 91, 215-221.

Horowitz, I.A. (1968). Effect of choice and locus of dependence on helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 373-376.

Isen, A.M., & Levin, P. (1972). Effect of feeling good on helping: cookies and kindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 384-388.

Isen, A.M., Shalker, T.E., Clark, M., & Karp, L. (1978). Affect, accessibility of material in memory, and behavior: A cognitive loop? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1-12.

Levin, P.R., & Isen, A.M. (1975). Further studies on the effect of feeling good on helping. Sociometry, 38, 141-147.

Pendleton, M.G., & Batson, C.D., 1979. Self-presentation and the door-inthe- face technique for inducing compliance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 5, 77-81.

Regan, D.T. (1971). Effects of a favor and liking on compliance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 627-639.

Solomon, H., Zener Solomon, L., Arnone, M.M., Maur, B.J., Reda, R.M., & Roth, E.O. (1981). Anonymity and helping. Journal of Social Psychology, 113, 37-43.

Schwartz, S.H., & Howard, J.A. (1981). A normative decision-making model of altruism. In: J.P. Rushton & R.M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior (pp. 89-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Staub, E. (1972). Instigation to goodness: The role of social norms and interpersonal infl uence, Journal of Social Issues, 28, 131-150.

Terrier, L., Marfaing, B., & Boldi, M-O. (2013). Door-in-the-face: Is it really necessary that both requests be made by the same requester? Psychological Reports, 113, 1-8.

Vrugt, A., & Vet., C. (2009). Effects of a smile on mood and helping behavior. Social Behavior and Personality, 37, 1251-1258.

Warneken, F. (2013c). The development of altruistic behavior: Helping in children and chimpanzees. Social Research, 80, 431-442.

Whatley, M.A., Webster, J.M., Smith, R.H., & Rhodes, A. (1999). The effect of a favor on public and private compliance: How internalized is the norm of reciprocity? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 251-259.

Polish Psychological Bulletin

The Journal of Committee for Psychological Sciences of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information

CiteScore 2016: 0.33

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.185
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.258


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 472 391 23
PDF Downloads 219 190 10