Seaport network performance measurement in the context of global freight supply chains

Open access

Abstract

A global distribution channel with a reliable freight transport system is essential in the contemporary world economy. Acting as trade facilitators, seaports are important players in the system. The study of the role of ports in supply chain management has recently drawn increasing attention from researchers and industry professionals alike. However, prior works mainly gathered the views from ports and terminals. To the authors’ knowledge, no attempt by previous empirical studies has been made to cover the perspective from shippers and logistics providers, who are obviously taking a serious role in the process of global freight movements as major stakeholders. It becomes thus imperative to assess a port’s supply chain orientation and performance from the perspective of the port users in the supply chain. Studying ports in the network context would be even more beneficial to capture the complexity needed to understand port performance and its interaction with various stakeholders. Drawing reference from multi-disciplinary fields, this paper aims to fill in the gap by developing a so-called unified framework for analysing port’s integration in global freight supply chains including shipping line networks, hinterland and intermodal transport network, and even urban network. The framework embraces a wider group of stakeholders involved, for example, terminal operators, port authorities, shippers, shipping companies, inland transport providers, freight forwarders/logistics service providers, cities and other ports in the networks. A port that is a key node in these networks simultaneously would be able to create and sustain value for port stakeholders. Port authorities and operators can refer to the framework as their network performance indicators so as to obtain a better understanding of the various considerations in a port’s network performance and to assist in positioning the port within the complex dynamics in the context of global freight supply chains. Finally, the framework developed in the paper can serve as a guide to empirical examinations of an emerging theme - a network-oriented performance by seaports along global freight supply chains - leading to various possible channels in future research.

1. Almotairi, B. and Lumsden, K. (2009), Port logistics platformintegration in supply chain management, International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 1(2), 194-210.

2. Alvarado, U.Y. and Kotzab, H. (2001), Supply chainmanagement: the integration of logistics in marketing, Industrial Marketing Management, 30(2), 183-198

3. Bichou, K. and Gray, R. (2004), A logistics and supply chainmanagement approach to port performance measurement, Maritime Policy and Management, 31(1), 47-67.

4. Birley, S. (1985), The role of networks in the entrepreneurialprocess, Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 107-117.

5. Borgatti, S.P. and Li, X. (2009), On social network analysis ina supply chain context, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(2), 5-22.

6. Braglia, M. and Petroni, A. (2000), A quality assurance-orientedmethodology for handling trade-offs in supplier selection, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 30(2), 96-111.

7. Brajkovich, L.F. (1994), Sources of social structure in a start-uporganization: work networks, work activities, and job status, Social Networks, 16(3), 191-212

8. Carbone, V. and Martino, M. (2003), The changing role of portsin supply chain management: an empirical analysis, Maritime Policy and Management, 30(4), 305-320.

9. Carbone, V. and Gouvernal, E. (2007), Supply chain and supplychain management: appropriate concepts for maritime studies. In Wang, J., Olivier, D., Notteboom, T. and Slack, B. (Eds.) Ports, Cities and Global Supply Chains, England: Ashgate, 11-26.

10. Carter, C.R., Ellram, L.M. and Tate, W.L. (2007), The Useof Social Network Analysis in Logistics Research, Journal of Business Logistics, 28(1), 137-168.

11. Chan, F.T.S. and Kumar, N. (2007), Global supplierdevelopment considering risk factors using fuzzy extendedAHP-based approach. OMEGA - International Journal of Management Science, 35(4), 417-431.

12. Coe, N.M., Dicken, P. and Hess, M. (2008), Global productionnetworks: realizing the potential, Journal of Economic Geography, 8, 271-295.

13. Cullinane, K., Ping, J. and Wang, T.-F. (2002), A multiobjectiveprogramming approach to the optimization of China’sinternational container transport network, International Journal of Transport Economics, 29, 181-99.

14. De Souza, G.A., Beresford, A.K.C., Pettit, S.J. (2003), Linershipping companies and terminal operators: internationalizationor globalization? Maritime Economics and Logistics, 5(4), 393-412.

15. De Langen, P,W. (2007), Stakeholders, conflicting interestsand governance in port clusters, Research in Transportation Economics, 17, 457-478.

16. Doshi, D., Malhotra, B., Bressan, S. and Lam, J.S.L. (2012), Mining maritime schedules for analyzing global shippingnetworks, International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining, in press.

17. Driessen, H. (2005), Mediterranean port cities: cosmopolitanismreconsidered, History and Anthropology, 16(1), 129-141.

18. Ducruet, C., Lee, S.W. and Ng, A.K.Y. (2010), Centrality andvulnerability in liner shipping networks: revisiting the NortheastAsian port hierarchy, Maritime Policy and Management, 37(1), 17-36.

19. Dyer, J.H. and Singh, H. (1998), The relational view: cooperativestrategy and sources of inter-organisationalcompetitive advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23, 660-679.

20. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case studyresearch, Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550

21. Fleming, D. and Hayuth, Y. (1994), Spatial characteristics oftransportation hubs: centrality and intermediacy, Journal of Transport Geography, 2(1), 3-18.

22. Freeman, L.C. (1977), A set of measures of centrality based onbetweenness, Sociometry, 40(1), 35-41.

23. Freeman, L.C. (1979), Centrality in social networks: conceptualclarification, Social Networks, 1, 215-239.

24. Fujita, M. and Mori, T. (1996), The role of ports in the makingof major cities: Self-agglomeration and hub-effect, Journal of Development Economics, 49, 93-120.

25. Fynes, B., Voss, C., de Burca, S. (2005), The impact of supplychain relationship quality on quality performance, International Journal of Production Economics, 96, 339-354.

26. Garcia, F.A., Marchetta, M.G., Camargom, M., Morel, L. and Forradellas, R.Q. (2012), A framework for measuring logisticsperformance in the wine industry, International Journal of Production Economics, 135, 284-298.

27. Grossmann, I. (2008), Perspectives for Hamburg as a port cityin the context of a changing global environment, Geoforum, 39, 2062-2072.

28. Hakansson, H. and Ford, D. (2002), How should companiesinteract in business networks. Journal of Business Research, 55, 133-139.

29. Hall, P.V. and Robbins, G. (2007), Which link, in whichchain? Inserting Durban into global automotive supply chains, In Wang, J., Olivier, D., Notteboom, T. and Slack, B. (Eds.) Ports, Cities and Global Supply Chains, England: Ashgate, 221-231.

30. Hayuth, Y. (2007), Globalisation and the port-urban interface:conflicts and opportunities, In Wang, J., Olivier, D., Notteboom, T. and Slack, B. (Eds.) Ports, Cities and Global Supply Chains, England: Ashgate,141-156.

31. Hayuth, Y. and Fleming, D.K. (1994), Concepts of strategiccommercial location: the case of container ports, Maritime Policy and Management, 21(3), 187-193.

32. Ketchen, D. J. Jr., Rebarick, W., Hult, G.T.M. and Meyer, D. (2008), Best value supply chains: A key competitive weapon forthe 21st century, Business Horizons, 51, 235-243.

33. Lagoudis, I. N., Lalwani, C.S. and Naim, M.M. (2006), Ranking of factors contributing to higher performance in theocean transportation industry: a multi-attribute utility theoryapproach, Maritime Policy and Management, 33, 345 - 369.

34. Lam, J.S.L. (2011), Patterns of maritime supply chains: slotcapacity analysis, Journal of Transport Geography, 19(2), 366-374.

35. Lam, J.S.L. and Yap, W.Y. (2006), A measurement andcomparison of cost competitiveness of container ports inSoutheast Asia, Transportation, 33(6), 641-654.

36. Lam, J.S.L. and Yap, W.Y. (2011), Dynamics of liner shippingnetwork and port connectivity in supply chain systems: analysison East Asia, Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1272-1281.

37. Langley, C.J. and Holcomb, M.C. (1992), Creating logisticscustomer value, Journal of Business Logistics, 13(2), 1-27

38. Larson, A. and Starr, J.A. (1993), A network model oforganization formation, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 17, 35-46.

39. Lee, S.W., Song D.W. and Ducruet, C. (2008), A tale of Asia’sworld ports: the spatial evolution in global hub port cities, Geoforum, 39, 372-385.

40. Lu, X.H., Huang, L.H. and Heng, M.S.H. (2006), Criticalsuccess factors of inter-organizational information systems: Acase study of Cisco and Xiao Tong in China, Information and Management, 43(3), 395-408.

41. Magala, M. and Sammons, A. (2008), A new approach to portchoice modelling, Maritime Economics and Logistics, 10(1/2), 9-34.

42. Mangan, J. and Lalwani, C. (2008), Port-centric logistics, International Journal of Logistics Management, 19(1), 29-41.

43. Notteboom, T. E. and Rodrigue, J.-P. (2005), PortRegionalization: Towards A New Phase in Port Development, Maritime Policy and Management, 32(3), 297-313.

44. Notteboom, T.E. and Rodrigue, J.-P. (2008), Containerisation,Box Logistics and Global Supply Chains: The Integration ofPorts and Liner Shipping Networks. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 10(1-2), 152-174.

45. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2010), Trends in the Transport Sector 2011, OECD Publishing.

46. Paixao, A. C., and Marlow, P. B. (2003), Fourth generationports- a question of agility? International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 33(4), 355-376.

47. Panayides, P.M. and Song, D.-W. (2008), Evaluating theintegration of seaport container terminals in supply chains, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 38(7), 562-584.

48. Parola, F. & Sciomachen, A. (2005), Intermodal ContainerFlows in A Port System Network: Analysis of Possible GrowthsVia Simulation Models, International Journal of Production Economics, 97(1), 75-88.

49. Partanen, J. and Moller, K. (2011), How to build a strategicnetwork: A practitioner-oriented process model for the ICTsector, Industrial Marketing Management, doi:10.1016/ j.indmarman.2011.05.002.

50. Paulraj, A., Lado, A.A. and Chen, I.J. (2008), Interorganizationalcommunication as a relational competency:Antecedents and performance outcomes in collaborative buyer-supplier relationships, Journal of Operations Management, 26(1), 45-64.

51. Pettit, S. J., and Beresford, A. K. C. (2009), Port development:from gateways to logistics hubs, Maritime Policy and Management, 36(3), 253-267.

52. Perez-Labajos, C. and Blanco, B., (2004), Competitive policiesfor commercial sea ports in the EU. Marine Policy, 28(6), 553-556.

53. Robinson, R. (2002), Ports as elements in value-driven chainsystems: the new paradigm, Maritime Policy and Management, 29, 241-255.

54. Roso, V. (2007), Evaluation of the dry port concept from anenvironmental perspective: A note, Transportation Research Part D, 12, 523-527.

55. Roso, V., Woxenius, J. and Lumsden, K. (2009), The Dry PortConcept: Connecting Container Seaports with the Hinterland, Journal of Transport Geography, 17(5), 338-345.

56. Saldanha, J.P., Tyworth, J.E., Swan, P.F. and Russell, D.M. (2009), Cutting logistics costs with ocean carrier selection, Journal of Business Logistics, 30(2), 175-195.

57. Song, D.-W. and Panayides, P.M. (2008), Global supply chainand port/terminal: integration and competitiveness, Maritime Policy and Management, 35(1), 73-87.

58. Srinivasan, K., Kekre, S., Mukhopadhyay, T. (1994), Impactof electronic data interchange technology on JIT shipments, Management Science, 40, 1291-1304.

59. Starr, J.T. and Slack, B. (1995). Ports As Gateways: ATraditional Concept Revisited. Proceeding of the 5th Conference International Villes et Ports, Dakar, 89-96.

60. Suykens, F. (1989), The city and its port: an economicappraisal, Geoforum, 20(4), 437-445.

61. Tan, T.Y. (2007), Port cities and hinterlands: A comparativestudy of Singapore and Calcutta, Political Geography, 26, 851-865.

62. Tongzon, J. Chang, Y.T. and Lee, S.Y. (2009), How supply chainoriented is the port sector? International Journal of Production Economics, 122, 21-34.

63. UNCTAD, (1999). The fourth generation port. UNCTAD Ports Newsletter 19, 9-12.

64. Wilding, R. and Humphries, A.S. (2006) Understandingcollaborative supply chain relationships through theapplication of the Williamson organizational failure framework, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 36( 4), 309-329.

65. Woo, S.H., Pettit, S. and Beresford, A.K.C. (2011) Portevolution and performance in changing logistics environments, Maritime Economics and Logistics, 13(3), 250-277.

66. Yeo, G.T., Roe, M. and Dinwoodie, J. (2011) Measuring thecompetitiveness of container ports: logisticians’ perspectives, European Journal of Marketing, 45(3), 455 - 470.

Polish Maritime Research

The Journal of Gdansk University of Technology

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1,214
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1,086


CiteScore 2018: 1.48

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.391
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.141

Cited By

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 383 245 18
PDF Downloads 215 159 10