Constitutional Judges and Secession. Lessons from Canada … twenty years later

Open access

Abstract

In constitutional theory, the referendum is an instrument that allows for the expression of the popular will in government decisions and through which people are asked to vote directly on an issue or policy. Over the last decades, the referendum has been the instrument used by minority groups to claim their independence supported by popular will. This paper examines trends in constitutional jurisprudence on the issue of independence referendums. The birth of this constitutional trend can be found in the 1998 decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in the Reference Re Secession of Quebec. The principles developed therein have been further explored in two recent cases, issued by the Italian Constitutional), and by the Spanish Constitutional Tribunal in the latest decision of the Catalonia saga (Judgment no. 114/2017).

• Althusius Johannes, 1980, ‘Politica Methodice Digesta, et exemplis sacris et profanis illustrata (1614)’, Italian Translation by Neri Demetrio (ed), Politica, Guida Editori, Napoli.

• Arangio-Ruiz Gaetano, 1971, ‘Stati ed altri enti (soggettività internazionale)’, in Novissimo Digesto Italiano, vol. XVIII, Utet, Torino.

• Behiels Michael D., 2005, Canada’s Francophone Minority Communities: Constitutional Renewal and the Winning of School Governance, McGill-Queen’s Press, Kingston.

• Bluntschli Johann Kaspar, 1881, Théorie générale de l'État, Libraire Guillaumin, Paris.

• Breton Raymond, 1992, Why Meech Failed: Lessons for Canadian Constitution-making, C.D. Howe Institute, Toronto.

• Butler David and Ranney Austin (ed), 1978, Referendums. A comparative study of practice and theory, American Enterprise Institute, Washington.

• Calhoun John C., 1992, ‘A Discourse on the Constitution and Government of the United States’, in Lence Ross M. (ed), John C. Calhoun, Union and Liberty: The Political Philosophy of John C. Calhoun, Liberty Fund, Indianapolis.

• Choudhry Sujit and Howse Robert, 2000, ‘Constitutional Theory and the Quebec Secession Reference’, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, XIII: 143-170.

• Claret Jaume-Santirso Manuel, 2014, La construcción del catalanismo. Historia de un afán político, Los libros de la Catarata, Madrid.

• Clift Dominique, 2014, Quebec Nationalism in Crisis, McGill-Queen’s Press, Kingston.

• Conte Francesco, 2015, ‘La Corte costituzionale sui referendum per l'autonomia e l'indipendenza del Veneto. Non c'eÌ due senza tre. Anche se...’, Quaderni costituzionali, XXXV(3): 759-761.

• Fasone Cristina, 2017, ‘Il parere della Corte suprema canadese sulla secessione del Quebec. Quali spunti per le odierne tensioni secessionist in Europa?’ in Delle Donne Giacomo, Martinico Giuseppe and Pierdominici Leonardo (eds), Il costituzionalismo canadese, a 150 anni dalla Confederazione. Riflessioni compratistiche, Pisa University Press, Pisa, forthcoming.<<<<

• Gaudreault-DesBiens Jean-Francois, 1999, ‘The Quebec Secession Reference and the Judicial Arbitration of Conflicting Narratives about Law, Democracy, and Identity’, Vermont Law Review, XXIII: 793-844.

• Gonzalez Carmen, 2016, ‘The Catalan National Identity and Catalonia's Bid for Independence’, Connecticut Journal of International Law, XXXII: 115-146.

• Groppi Tania, 2006, Canada, Il Mulino, Bologna.

• Ibrido Renato, 2011, ‘Il rebus dell’interpretazione conforme alla luce della recente sentenza sullo Statuto catalano’, Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo, XIII(1): 54-67

• Jellinek Georg, 1949, La dottrina generale del diritto dello Stato, Italian translation by, Petrozziello Modestino, Giuffré, Milano.

• Locke John, 1982, Due trattati sul governo e altri scritti politici, Pareyson Luigi (ed), Utet, Torino.

• Mancini Susanna, 2012, ‘Secession and Self-Determination’ in Rosenfeld Michel and Sajó András (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 481-501.

• Margiotta Costanza, 2005, L’ultimo diritto. Profili storici e teorici della secessione, Il Mulino, Bologna.

• Miglio Gianfranco and Barbera Augusto, 1997, Federalismo e secessione. Un dialogo, Mondadori, Milano.

• Morel Laurence, 2012, ‘Referendum’, in Rosenfeld Michel and Sajó András (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 502-528.

• Murswiek Dietrich, 1993, ‘The Issue of a Right of Secession-Reconsidered’, in Tomuschat Christian (ed), Modern Law of Self-Determination, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dodrecht, Boston, London.

• Neff Stephen C., 2015, ‘Secession and Breach of Compact: The Law of Nature Meets the United States Constitution’, Akron Law Review, XLV(2): 405-429.

• Nemni Max, 1993, ‘La Commission Bélanger-Campeau et la construction de l'idée de sécession au Québec’, Revue internationale d'études canadiennes, no. 7-8: 285-312.

• Oleart, Oriol, 2014, ‘From Legal Compilations to Legal Codes: A Catalan Legal History Approach (18'-20th Centuries)’, International Journal of Legal Information, XLII: 1-3.

• Pinard Maurice and Hamilton Richard, 1978, ‘The Parti Québécois Comes to Power: An Analysis of the 1976 Quebec Election’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, XI: 739-775.

• Puig i Scotoni Pau, 2001-2002, ‘Exercising Self-Determination Without Jeopardising the Rights of Others: The Catalan Model’, St. Thomas Law Review, XIV: 395-399.

• Quadri Rolando, 1968, Diritto internazionale pubblico, Liguori, Napoli.

• Qvortrup Matt, 2014, ‘New development: The comparative study of secession referendums’, Public Money & Management, XXXIV(2): 1-4.

• Romero Caro Francisco Javier, 2017, ‘The Spanish vision of Canada’s Clarity Act: From Idealization to Myth’, Perspectives on Federalism, IX(3).

• Ruggiu Ilenia, 2016, ‘Referendum e secessione. L’appello al popolo per l’indipendenza in Scozia e in Catalogna’, Costituzionalismo.it, XIV(2): 71-102.

• Salerno Giulio Maria (1988), ‘Referendum’, in Enciclopedia del diritto, vol. 39, Giuffré, Milano, 200 ff.

• Tega Diletta, 2015, ‘Venezia non è Barcellona. Una via italiana per le rivendicazioni di autonomia?’, Le Regioni, XLIII(5-6): 1141-1155.

• Tosi Dario Elia, 2006, Secessione e Costituzione tra prassi e teoría, Jovene, Napoli.

• Wood John R., 1981, ‘Secession: A Comparative Analytical Framework’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, XVI: 107-134.

Reference re Manitoba Language Rights, (1985) 1 S.C.R. 721 (Manitoba Language Rights Reference)

Reference re Secession of Quebec, [1998] 25 S.C.R. 217.

Judgment no. 1146/1988.

Judgment no. 256/1989.

Judgment no. 470/1992.

Judgment no. 496/2000.

Judgment no. 106/2002.

Judgment no. 306/2002.

Judgment no. 372/2004.

Judgment no. 365/2007.

Judgment no. 188/2011.

Judgment no. 80/2012.

Judgment no. 64/2015.

Judgment no. 81/2015.

Judgment no. 118/2015.

Decision no. 122/2015, of July 7.

Decision no. 24/2017, of February 14.

Judgment no. 76/1988, of April 26.

Judgment no. 48/2003, of March 12.

Judgment no. 103/2008, of September 11.

Judgment no. 103/2008, of September 11.

Judgment no. 31/2010, of June 28.

Judgment no. 100/2012, of May 8.

Judgment no. 26/2014, of February 13.

Judgment no. 42/2014, of March 25.

Judgment no. 215/2014, of December 18.

Judgment no. 31/2015, of February 25.

Judgment no. 32/2015, of February 25.

Judgment no. 138/2015, of June 11.

Judgment no. 259/2015, of December 2.

Judgment no. 51/2017, of May 10.

Judgment no. 90/2017, of July 5.

Judgment no. 114/2017, of October 17.

Texas vs. White, 74 U.S. 700 (1869)

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.20

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.107
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.395

Target Group researchers, academics, practitioners interested in the field of political, economic and legal issues in federal states, regional organizations, and international organizations at global level

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 270 266 26
PDF Downloads 126 125 18