COSAC has played an active role in fostering and developing interparliamentary he central question addressed here is to assess whether COSAC is currently structured to allow NPs to obtain more information and access to the policy and decision-making circuits at EU level and, therefore, if NPs are benefiting from COSAC or are they, on the contrary, lagging behind and lost amidst so many interparliamentary meetings?
It is argued that COSAC occupies a key role in the multipolarised system of with the “global picture” and therefore in a unique position to bring coherence to the overall system. This paper therefore aims at putting forward some ideas and approaches regarding the role of COSAC in the effectiveness of interparliamentary cooperation, covering not only its present proceedings and output, but also some thoughts for further reflection on the future strengthening of COSAC.
• Dias Pinheiro Bruno, 2016, ‘The Role of COSAC in the Changing Environment of National Parliaments in the EU: An Identity Crisis?’, in Lupo Nicola and Fasone Cristina (eds), Interparliamentary Cooperation in the Composite European Constitution, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 303-310.
• Dias Pinheiro Bruno, 2017, ‘Interparliamentary Cooperation between NPs’, in Jonsson Cornell Anna and Goldoni Marco (eds), National and Regional Parliaments in the EU-Legislative Procedure Post-Lisbon: The Impact of the Early Warning Mechanism, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 87-113.
• Fabbrini Federico and Granat Katarzyna, 2013, ‘“Yellow card, but no foul”: The role of the NPs under the Subsidiarity Protocol and the Commission proposal for an EU regulation on the right to strike’, Common Market Law Review, L(1): 115-143.
• Fromage Diane, 2017, ‘Standing committees in interparliamentary cooperation in the post-Lisbon era: towards the end of the European Affairs Committees’ predominance?’, in Lupo Nicola and Fasone Cristina (eds), Interparliamentary Cooperation in the Composite European Constitution, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 113-130.
• Goldoni Marco, 2014, ‘The early warning system and the Monti II Regulation: The case for a political interpretation’, European Constitutional Law Review, X(1): 90-108.
• Griglio Elena and Lupo Nicola, 2014, ‘Towards and asymmetric EU, without an asymmetric EP’, Working Paper Series, LUISS Guido Carli School of Government.
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.105 Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.03
researchers, academics, practitioners interested in the field of political, economic and legal issues in federal states, regional organizations, and international organizations at global level