The Contribution of COSAC to Joint Parliamentary Scrutiny in the EU: A Practitioner’s View

Open access

Abstract

COSAC has played an active role in fostering and developing interparliamentary he central question addressed here is to assess whether COSAC is currently structured to allow NPs to obtain more information and access to the policy and decision-making circuits at EU level and, therefore, if NPs are benefiting from COSAC or are they, on the contrary, lagging behind and lost amidst so many interparliamentary meetings?

It is argued that COSAC occupies a key role in the multipolarised system of with the “global picture” and therefore in a unique position to bring coherence to the overall system. This paper therefore aims at putting forward some ideas and approaches regarding the role of COSAC in the effectiveness of interparliamentary cooperation, covering not only its present proceedings and output, but also some thoughts for further reflection on the future strengthening of COSAC.

• Auel Katrin and Benz Arthur, 2005, ‘The Politics of Adaptation: the Europeanisation of National Parliamentary Systems’, Journal of Legislative Studies, XI(3-4): 372-393.

• Auel Katrin and Christiansen Thomas, 2015, ‘After Lisbon: NPs in the European Union’, West European Politics, XXXVIII(2): 261-281.

• Besselink Leonard, 2007, A composite European Constitution, Europa Law Publishing, Groningen.

• Cooper Ian, 2012, ‘A “Virtual Third Chamber” for the European Union? National Parliaments after the Treaty of Lisbon’, West European Politics, XXXV(3): 441-465.

• Cooper Ian, 2017, ‘The IPCs of the EU: discussion forums or oversight bodies?’ (draft).

• Crum Ben and Fossum John Erik, 2009, ‘The Multilevel Parliamentary Field: a framework for theorizing representative democracy in the EU’, European Political Science Review, I(2): 249-271.

• De Wilde Pieter, 2012, ‘Why the early warning mechanism does not alleviate the democratic deficit’, OPAL Online Paper, No. 6/2012.

• Dias Pinheiro Bruno, 2012, The Treaty of Lisbon and the adaptation of NPs to the challenges of European integration: the case of the permanent representatives of NPs to the EU institutions, ISCSP, Lisbon, abstract available at https://www.repository.utl.pt/bitstream/10400.5/5124/1/ABSTRACT%20Bruno%20Dias%20Pinheiro%5b1%5d.pdf.

• Dias Pinheiro Bruno, 2016, ‘The Role of COSAC in the Changing Environment of National Parliaments in the EU: An Identity Crisis?’, in Lupo Nicola and Fasone Cristina (eds), Interparliamentary Cooperation in the Composite European Constitution, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 303-310.

• Dias Pinheiro Bruno, 2017, ‘Interparliamentary Cooperation between NPs’, in Jonsson Cornell Anna and Goldoni Marco (eds), National and Regional Parliaments in the EU-Legislative Procedure Post-Lisbon: The Impact of the Early Warning Mechanism, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 87-113.

• Fabbrini Federico and Granat Katarzyna, 2013, ‘“Yellow card, but no foul”: The role of the NPs under the Subsidiarity Protocol and the Commission proposal for an EU regulation on the right to strike’, Common Market Law Review, L(1): 115-143.

• Fromage Diane, 2017, ‘Standing committees in interparliamentary cooperation in the post-Lisbon era: towards the end of the European Affairs Committees’ predominance?’, in Lupo Nicola and Fasone Cristina (eds), Interparliamentary Cooperation in the Composite European Constitution, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 113-130.

• Goldoni Marco, 2014, ‘The early warning system and the Monti II Regulation: The case for a political interpretation’, European Constitutional Law Review, X(1): 90-108.

• Griglio Elena and Lupo Nicola, 2014, ‘Towards and asymmetric EU, without an asymmetric EP’, Working Paper Series, LUISS Guido Carli School of Government.

• Jančić Davor, 2013, ‘NPs in the EU: Biting the subsidiarity bait?’, International Journal of Constitutional Law Blog, 25 Sept. 2013, www.iconnectblog.com/2013/09/national-parliaments-in-the-eu-biting-the-subsidiarity-bait.

• Jančić Davor, 2015, ‘The Game of Cards: NPs in the EU and the future of the early warning mechanism and the political dialogue’, Common Market Law Review, LII(4): 939-975.

• Kiiver Philipp, 2006, National parliaments in the European Union: a critical view on EU constitution-building, Aspen Publishers, Frederick MD.

• Kiiver Philipp, 2008, ‘The Treaty of Lisbon, the National Parliaments, and the Principle of Subsidiarity’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, XV(1): 77-83.

• Kiiver Philipp, 2012, ‘The conduct of subsidiarity checks of EU legislative proposals by NPs: Analysis, observations and practical recommendation’, ERA Forum, XII: 535-547.

• Raunio Tapio and Wiberg Matti, 2010, ‘How to Measure the Europeanisation of a National Legislature?’, Scandinavian Political Studies, XXXIII(1): 74-92.

Journal Information

CiteScore 2018: 0.04

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.105
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.03

Target Group researchers, academics, practitioners interested in the field of political, economic and legal issues in federal states, regional organizations, and international organizations at global level

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 93 93 3
PDF Downloads 68 68 2