From Pre-Grammaticality to Proficiency in L1: Acquiring and Developing Infinitival Usage in Hebrew

Open access


The study traces the developmental route in acquisition and use of infinitives (e.g., lišon ‘to sleep’, le-exol ‘to-eat’, la-asot ’to-do’) in Hebrew as a first language, proceeding from the initial, “pre-grammatical“ emergence of linguistic forms among toddlers to structure-based knowledge and proficient use of the same devices in adolescence. Analysis involves a varied data-base of L1 oral Hebrew usage in: parent-child interactions of children aged 1;6 to 3;0 years; elicited storybook-based narratives of preschoolers; and personal-experience narratives and expository talks of schoolchildren, adolescents, and adults. Findings show that infinitives constitute an interesting test-case for examining the route from initial emergence via acquisition to maturely proficient command of a given subsystem in L1. Infinitival structures in Modern Hebrew, a language with an impoverished system of nonfinite verbs and lacking in auxiliaries of the kind common in Standard Average European, reveal a long developmental path, showing increasing complexity at all levels of language use: morphological form, types of syntactic constructions, semantic content, and discursive function, the latter primarily for the purpose of achieving textual connectivity.

Adam, G., & Bat-El, O. (2008). Morphological knowledge without morphological structure. Current Issues in Generative Hebrew Linguistics, 134, 197.

Azar, M. (1977). Surface and depth in syntax. Haifa: Haifa University Press [in Hebrew].

Berman, R. A. (1978a). Modern Hebrew structure. Tel Aviv: University Publishing Projects.

Berman, R. A. (1978b). Early verbs: How and why a child uses her first words. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 5, 21-29.

Berman, R. A. (1980). On the category of auxiliary in Modern Hebrew. Hebrew Annual Review, 4, 15-37.

Berman, R. A. (1981). Language development and language knowledge: Evidence from the acquisition of Hebrew morphophonology. Journal of Child Language, 8(3), 609-626.

Berman, R. A. (1985). Acquisition of Hebrew. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [Also in D. I. Slobin (Ed.), Crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, (vol. I, pp. 255-371). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum]

Berman, R. A. (1986). A step-by-step model of language learning. In I. Levin (Ed.), Stage and structure: Re-opening the debate (pp. 191-219). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Berman, R. A. (1988). On the ability to relate events in narratives. Discourse Processes, 11, 469-97.

Berman, R. A. (1993). Developmental perspectives on transitivity: A confluence of cues. In Y. Levy (Ed.), Other children, other languages: Issues in the Theory of Acquisition (pp. 189-241). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Berman, R. A. (1996). Form and function in developing narrative abilities: The case of ‘and’. In D. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis, & J. Guo (Eds.), Social interaction, context, and language: Essays in honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp (pp. 343-367). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Berman, R. A. (2001). Setting the narrative scene: How children begin to tell a story. In A. Aksu-Koç, C. Johnson, & K. Nelson (Eds.), Children’s language (vol. 10, pp. 1-31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Berman, R. A. (2004a). Between emergence and mastery: The long developmental route of language acquisition. In R. A. Berman (Ed.), Language development across childhood and adolescence (Trends in language acquisition research [TILAR]) (vol. 3, pp. 9-34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Berman, R. A. (2004b). The role of context in developing narrative abilities. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 261-280). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Berman, R. A. (2008). The psycholinguistics of developing text construction. Journal of Child Language, 35, 735-771.

Berman, R. A. (2014). Acquiring and expressing temporality in Hebrew: A T/ (M/A) Language. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 11(2), 2-29.

Berman, R. A. (2017). Usage-based perspectives on form-function relations: The case of nonfinite verbs in Modern Hebrew. Keynote talk, 3rd Usage-Based Linguistics Conference, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, July.

Berman, R. A & Armon-Lotem, S. (1997). How grammatical are early verbs? In C. Martinot (Ed.), Annales littéraires de l’Université de Franche-Comté: Actes du colloque international sur l’acquisition de la syntaxe (pp. 17-60).

Berman, R. A. & Neeman, Y. (1994). Development of linguistic forms: Hebrew. In R. A. Berman & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study (pp. 285-328). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Berman, R. A. & Nir-Sagiv, B. (2009). Clause-packaging in narratives: A crosslinguistic developmental study. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & S. Ozcaliskan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan I. Slobin (pp. 149-162). New Zork, NY: Taylor & Francis.

Berman, R. A. & Slobin, D. I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Berman, R. A. & Verhoeven, L. (2002). Developing text production abilities in speech and writing: Aims and methodology. Written Languages and Literacy, 5, 1-44.

Blau, J. (1966). Essentials of syntax. Jerusalem: Israel Institute for Writing Education [in Hebrew].

Bloom, L., Tackeff, J., & Lahey, M. (1984). Learning to in complement constructions. Journal of Child Language, 11(2), 391-406.

Bowerman, M. (2011). Linguistic typology and first language acquisition. In J. J. Song (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology (pp. 591-617). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

de Villiers, J. G., & de Villiers, P. A. (1986). The acquisition of English. The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, 1, 27-139.

Dekel, N. (2010). A matter of time: tense, mood and aspect in spontaneous Spoken Israeli Hebrew. Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.

Diessel, H. (2004). The acquisition of complex sentences (Vol. 105). Cambridge: University Press.

Dromi, E. & Berman, R. A. (1986). Language-general and language-specific in developing syntax. Journal of Child Language, 14, 371-387.

Dubnov, K. (2015). Circumstantial versus depictive secondary predicates in literary Hebrew - the influence of Yiddish and Russian. In E. Doron (Ed.), Language contact and the development of Modern Hebrew (pp. 77-86). Leiden: Brill.

Evans, N. (2007). Insubordination and its uses. In I. Nikolaeva (Ed.). Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations (pp. 367-431). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Evans, N., & Watanabe, H. (Eds.). (2016). Dynamics of insubordination. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Faust, N. (submitted). Gutturals in Modern Hebrew. To appear in R. A. Berman & E. Grossman (Eds.), A usage based reference grammar of Modern Hebrew. Berlin: Mouton De-Gruyter.

Givón, T. (2009). The genesis of syntactic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Goldfajn, T. (1998). Word order and time in Biblical Hebrew narrative. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350-377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Johnstone, B. (1987). Parataxis in Arabic: Modification as a model for persuasion. Studies in Language, 11, 85-98.

Kalev, D. (2017a). Modern times-tenses: Grammaticization of the anterior in contemporary Hebrew. In A. Amit & H. B. Z. Shyldkrot (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th and 30th Annual Conferences of the Israel Linguistic Society, 20, 51-60.[In Hebrew]

Kalev, D. (2017b). Relative tenses in Hebrew: Anterior and posterior. In A. Amit & H. B. Z. Shyldkrot (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st and 32nd Annual Conferences of the Israel Linguistic Society, 21, 20-40. [In Hebrew]

Kaplan, D. & Berman, R. A. (2015). Developing linguistic flexibility across the school years. First Language, 35, 27-53.

Karmiloff-smith A. (1985). Language and cognitive processes from a developmental perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 61-85. DOI: 10.1080/01690968508402071

Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1995). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

Lustigman, L. (2012). Non-finiteness in early Hebrew verbs. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics (BAALL), 4, 213-231.

Lustigman, L. (2013). Developing structural specification: Productivity in early Hebrew verb usage. First Language, 33, 47-67.

Lustigman, L. (2015). Optional opacity: A syntactically-based analysis of early Hebrew verb morphology. First Language, 35, 466-488.

Lustigman, L. (2016a). From opacity to transparency: Transitional categories in early Hebrew grammar. In R. A. Berman (Ed.), Acquisition and Development of Hebrew: From infancy to adolescence (Trends in Language Acquisition Research [TILAR]) (vol. 19, pp. 225-258). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Lustigman, L. (2016b). Interfaces between linguistic systems: Evidence from child language. Linguistics, 54, 273-303.

Lustigman L. & Berman, R. A. (2016). Form and function in early clause-combining. Journal of Child Language, 43, 157-185.

Nir-Sagiv, B. & Berman, R. A. (2010). Complex syntax as a window on contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 744-765.

Ostler, Shirley E., 1987. English in parallels: A comparison of English and Arabic prose. In: Connor, U. & Kaplan, R. (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 texts (pp. 169-185). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

Ostler, S. E. (1988). A study in the contrastive rhetoric of Arabic, English, Japanese, and Spanish. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Southern California.

Polak, F. H. (1998). The oral and the written: Syntax, stylistics and the development of Biblical prose narrative. Journal of the Ancient Near Eastern Society, 26, 59-105.

Ravid, D. (1995). Language change in child and adult Hebrew: A psycholinguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ravid, D. (2003). A developmental perspective on root perception in Hebrew and Palestinian Arabic. Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 28, 293-320.

Ravid, D., Ashkenazi, O., Levie, R., Ben Zadok, G., Grunwald, T., Bratslavsky, R. & Gillis, S. (2016). Foundations of the root category: analyses of linguistic input to Hebrew-speaking children. In R. A. Berman (Ed.), Acquisition and Development of Hebrew: From Infancy to Adolescence (Trends in Language Acquisition Research [TILAR]) (vol. 19, pp. 95-134). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ravid, D. & Cahana-Amitay, D. (2005). Verbal and nominal expression in narrating conflict situations in Hebrew. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 157-183.

Ravid, D. & Tolchinsky, L. (2002). Developing linguistic literacy: A comprehensive model. Journal of Child Language, 29, 419-448.

Reilly, J. S., Jisa, H., Baruch, E. & Berman, R. A. (2002). Modal expression of propositional attitudes. Written Languages and Literacy, 5(2), 183-218.

Reinhart, T. (1984). Principles of gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative texts. Linguistics, 22(6), 779-810.

Rubinstein, E. (1980). Contemporary Hebrew and Ancient Hebrew. Tel Aviv: University on the Air [in Hebrew].

Schwarzwald, O. (2003). Opacity in Hebrew word morphology. In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root-based, morphology (pp. 147-163). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Seroussi, B. (2014). Root transparency and the morphology-meaning interface: Data from Hebrew. In F. Rainer, F. Gardani, H. C. Luschützky, & W. U. Dressler (Eds.), Morphology and Meaning [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 327] (pp. 289-301). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Slobin, D. I. (1996). From "thought and language" to "thinking to speaking". In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70-96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Slobin, D. I. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (vol 2, pp. 219-257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Slobin, D. I., Bowerman, M., Brown, P., Eisenbeiss, S. & Narasimhan, B. (2011). Putting things in places: Developmental consequences of linguistic typology. In J. Bohnemeyer & E. Pederson (Eds.), Event representation in language and cognition (pp. 134-165). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Tomasello, M. (2009). Constructing a language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Waltke, B. K., & O'Connor, M. P. (1990). An introduction to Biblical Hebrew syntax. Winona Lake, Ind: Eisenbrauns.

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.34

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.144
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.359


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 29 29 16
PDF Downloads 10 10 7