Whorfian potential in child language

Open access


As toddlers begin the language acquisition process, event memory and the capacity for dead-reckoning are developing in the cognitive domain, providing the potential to think about the relative location of events in time and objects in space. While the language they happen to be learning varies in structure, every language has a way of coding the location of events / objects in time / space. We can think of the toddler as a code breaker who arrives at the acquisition problem with a set of language information processing abilities. Depending how temporal and / or spatial location is coded in the language, it will make the toddler’s code-breaking problem more or less difficult, providing the potential to facilitate acquisition. Benjamin Whorf argued that the structure of a child’s language influences the course of conceptual development within the realms of temporal and spatial thinking. If the structure of a particular language matches the toddler’s processing capacities in either the temporal or spatial domain, then the resulting precocious acquisition in that domain provides the potential to influence conceptual development. This paper investigates such a potential in child language, i.e., a developmental Whorfian hypothesis.

Allen, S. E. M. (1997). Aspects of argument structure acquisition in Inuktitut. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Atance, C. M. (2008). From the past into the future: The developmental origins and trajectory of episodic future thinking. In E. Dere, A. Easton, L. Nadel, & J. P. Huston (Eds.), Handbook of episodic memory (pp. 99-114). Netherlands: Elsevier.

Atance, C. M., & O’Neill, D. K. (2005). The emergence of episodic future thinking in humans. Learning and Motivation, 36, 126-144.

Bauer, P. J. (2007). Remembering the times of our lives: Memory in infancy and beyond. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Berman, R. & Slobin, D. I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bowerman, M. (1981). Notes for the Nijmegen workshop. MPI, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Bowerman, M. (1985). What shapes children’s grammars? In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 2, pp. 1257-1320). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Brown, P. (2001). Learning to talk about motion UP and DOWN in Tzeltal: Is there a language-specific bias for verb learning? In M. Bowerman & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 512-543). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Choi, S. (1991). Early acquisition of epistemic meanings of Korean: A study of sentence-ending suffixes in the spontaneous speech of three children. First Language, 11, 93-120.

Choi, S. (2006). Influence of language-specific input on spatial cognition: Categories of containment. First Language, 77, 207-232.

Choi, S., & Bowerman, M. (1991). Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexication patterns. Cognition, 41, 83-121.

Choi, S., McDonough, L., Bowerman, M., & Mandler, J. M. (1999). Early sensitivity to language-specific spatial categories in English and Korean. Cognitive Development, 14, 241-268.

Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed). Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27-63). New York, NY: Academic Press.

De León, L. (2001). Finding the richest path: Language and cognition in the acquisition of verticality in Tzotzil (Mayan). In M. Bowerman & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 544-565). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fivush, R. (1995). Language, narrative, and autobiography. Consciousness and Cognition, 4, 100-103.

Fivush, R., Haden, C., & Adam, S. (1995). Structure and coherence of the preschoolers’ personal narratives over time: Implications for childhood amnesia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 32-56.

Gee, J., & Savasir, I. (1985). On the use of will and gonna: Toward a description of activity-types for child language. Discourse Processes, 8, 143-175.

Haun, D. B. M., Rapold, C. J., Call, J., Janzen, G., & Levinson, S. C. (2006). Cognitive cladistics and culture override in hominid spatial cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 103(46), 17568-17573.

Johnston, J. R., & Slobin, D. I. (1979). The development of locative expressions in English, Italian, Serbo-Croatian, and Turkish. Journal of Child Language, 6, 529-545.

Kuczaj, S. A. (1976). ‘-ing’, ‘-s’, & ‘-ed’: A study of the acquisition of certain verb inflections. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology.

Levinson, S. C. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 109-170). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Exploration in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Li, P., Abarbanell, L., Gleitman, L., & Papafragou, A. (2011). Spatial reasoning in Tenejapan Mayans. Cognition, 120(1), 33-53.

Lucy, J. A. (1992). Language diversity and thought: A reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lucy, J. A., & Gaskins, S. (2001). Grammatical categories and the development of classification preferences: A comparative approach. In M. Bowerman & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 257-283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Meltzoff, A. M. (1988). Infant imitation after a 1-week delay: Long-term memory for novel acts and multiple stimuli. Developmental Psychology, 24, 470-476.

Meltzoff, A. M. (2005). Imitation and other minds: The “Like Me” hypothesis. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspective on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (Vol. 2, pp. 55-77). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Newcombe, N. S. (2017). Cognitive development in comparative perspective: Exploring the role of language acquisition in spatial, quantitative, and memory development. In J. Call (Ed.). APA handbook of comparative psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 403-425). Washington, DC: APA Books.

Newcombe, N. S. & Huttenlocher, J. (2003). Making space: The development of spatial representation and reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Newcombe, N. S., Huttenlocher, J., Drummey, A. B., & Wiley, J. (1998). The development of spatial location: Place learning and dead reckoning in the second and third years. Cognitive Development, 13, 185-200.

Newcombe, N., & Uttal, D. (2006). Whorf versus Socrates, round 10. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 394-396.

Ozturk, O. & Papafragou, A. (2016). The acquisition of evidentiality and source monitoring. Language, Learning, and Development, 12(2), 199-230.

Papafragou, A., Li, P., Choi, Y. & Han, C. (2007). Evidentiality in language and cognition. Cognition, 103, 253-299.

Papafragou, A., Hulbert, J., & Trueswell, J. (2008). Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 108, 155-184.

Pawlak, A., Oehlrich, J., & Weist, R. M. (2006). Reference time in child English and Polish. First Language, 78, 281 298.

Peterson, C., & Rideout, R. (1998). Memory for medical emergencies experienced by 1- and 2-year-olds. Developmental Psychology, 14, 1059-1072.

Piaget, J. (1952). The origin of intelligence in children. New York, NY: Norton. Rovee-Collier, C. K. (1997). Dissociations in infant memory: Rethinking the development of implicit and explicit memory. Psychological Review, 104, 467-498.

Rovee-Collier, C. K. (1999). The development of infant memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 80-85.

Sachs, J. (1983). Talking about the there and then: The emergence of displaced reference in parent-child discourse. In K. E. Nelson (Ed.), Children's language (Vol. 4, pp. 1-28). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Shirai, Y., & Andersen, R. W. (1995). The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language, 71, 743-762.

Simcock, G., & Hayne, H. (2003). Age-related changes in verbal and nonverbal memory during early childhood. Developmental Psychology, 39(5), 805-814.

Slobin, D. I. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70-96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Slobin, D. I. & Aksu, A. (1982). Tense, aspect, and modality in the use of the Turkish evidential. In P. J. Hopper (Ed.), Tense-aspect: Between semantics and pragmatics (pp. 185-200). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins.

Spelke, E. S. (2000). Core knowledge. American Psychologist, 55, 1233-1243.

Stephany, U. (1986). Modality. In P. Fletcher & M. Garman (Eds.), Language acquisition (pp. 375-400). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swift, M. D. (2004). Time in child Inuktitut: A developmental study of an Eskimo-Aleut language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Tillman, K. A., Marghetis, T., Barner, D., & Srinivasan, M. (2017). Today is tomorrow’s yesterday: Children’s acquisition of deictic time words. Cognitive psychology, 92, 87-100.

Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there? American Psychologist, 40, 385-398.

Ünal, E. & Papafragou, A. (2016). Interactions between language and mental representations. Language Learning, 66(3), 554-580.

Van Valin, R. D. (2005). The syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface: An introduction to Role and Reference Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Weist, R.M. (1991). Spatial and temporal location in child language. First Language, 11, 253-267.

Weist, R.M. (2002). The first language acquisition of tense and aspect. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.) The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 21-78). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Weist, R. M. (2009). One-to-one mapping of temporal and spatial relations. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, S. Ervin-Tripp, N. Budwig, S. Őzçalişkan, & K. Nakamura (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 69-79). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Weist, R. M. (2014). Future temporal reference in child language. In P. De Brabanter, M. Kissine, & S. Sharifzadeh (Eds.), Future times: Future tenses (pp. 87-113). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Weist, R. M., Atanassova, M., Wysocka, H., & Pawlak, A. (1999). Spatial and temporal systems in child language and thought: A cross-linguistic study. First Language. 19, 267-312.

Weist, R. M. & Buczowska, E. (1987). The emergence of temporal adverbs in child Polish. First Language, 7, 217-229.

Weist, R. M., Lyytinen, P., Wysocka, J., & Atanassova, M. (1997). The interaction of language and thought in children’s language acquisition: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Child Language. 24, 81-121.

Weist, R. M., Pawlak, A., & Carapella, J. (2004). Syntactic-semantic interface in the acquisition of verb morphology. Journal of Child Language, 31, 31-60.

Weist, R. M., Pawlak, A., & Hoffman, K. (2009). Finiteness systems and lexical aspect in child Polish and English. Linguistics, 47, 1321-1350.

Weist, R. M., & Zevenbergen, A. (2008). Autobiographical memory and past time reference. Language Learning and Development, 4, 291-308.

Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (J. B. Carroll, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.34

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.144
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.359


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 25 25 25
PDF Downloads 20 20 20