Interrelations Between Perspective Taking and Reading Experience: A Longitudinal View on Students in the Fifth Year of School

Open access


Social perspective taking (SPT) and the coordination of subjective and alternative perspectives are paramount to social behavior. Scholars tend to agree that approaches to conceptualizing SPT relate to interpersonal understanding and to language skills. The aim of this study was to determine whether interrelations exist between children’s SPT and experience in reading because reading requires the reader to take various perspectives. Additionally, receptive vocabulary and reading fluency of 2,105 children were assessed and they completed a questionnaire at the beginning, in the middle, and at the end of fifth grade. Results indicated that the students’ SPT was determined by gender and reading experience with books and newspapers. We conclude that this reading experience affects students’ SPT levels positively; that finding can contribute to the development of school-based activities to enhance SPT levels.

Adams, R., & Wu, M. (2002). PISA 2000 Technical Report. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved from

Allington, R. L. (1984). Content coverage and contextual reading in reading groups. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 85-96. doi:

Atkins, D., Uskul, A. K., & Cooper, N. R. (2016). Culture shapes empathic responses to physical and social pain. Emotion, 16, 587-601. doi:

Auer, M., Gruber, G., Mayringer, H., & Wimmer, H. (2011). Salzburger Lese-Screening für die Klassenstufen 5-8 (SLS 5-8) [Salzburg reading assessment for fifth to eight grade students]. Bern: Hans Huber.

Barnes-Holmes, Y., McHugh, L., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004). Perspective taking and theory of mind: A relational frame account. The Behavior Analyst Today, 5, 15-25. doi:

Baron-Cohen, S., Bowen, D. C., Holt, R. J., Allison, C., Auyeung, B., Lombardo, M. V. et al. (2015). The “reading the mind in the eyes” test: Complete absence of typical sex difference in ~400 men and women with Autism. PLoS ONE, 10, e0136521. doi:

Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Lombardo, M. V. (2013). Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental social neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Biemiller, A. (1977-1978). Relationships between oral reading rates for letters, words, and simple text in the development of reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 13, 223-253. doi:

Blakemore, S. J., & Choudhury, S. (2006). Development of the adolescent brain: implications for executive function and social cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 296-312. doi:

Bloom, P., & German, T. P. (2000). Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind. Cognition, 77, B25-B31. doi:

Britt, M., Goldman, S., & Rouet, J. (Eds.). (2012). Reading: From words to multiple texts. New York, NY: Routledge.

Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., Augustyn, J. S., & Taylor, H. A. (2009). When you and I share perspectives. Pronouns modulate perspective taking during narrative comprehension. Psychological Science, 20, 27-32. doi:

Buhl, H. M., Möller, F., Oebser, M., Stein, F., & Noack, P. (2009). Zusammenhänge zwischen der Fähigkeit zur Perspektivenübernahme und dem Textverstehen im Vor- und Grundschulalter [Associations between perspective-taking skill and text comprehension of pre-school and elementary-school students] . Diskurs Kindheits- und Jugendforschung, 1, 75-90.

Chambers, J. R., & Davis, M. H. (2012). The role of the self in perspective taking and empathy: Ease of self-simulation as a heuristic for inferring empathic feelings. Social Cognition, 30, 153-180. doi:

Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to RE and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33, 934-945. doi:

Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85-94.

Davlin, N. L., Rehfeldt, R. A., & Lovett, S. (2011). A relational frame theory approach to understanding perspective taking using children’s stories in typically developing children. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 12, 403-430.

Entorf, H., & Minoiu, N. (2004). What a difference immigration law makes: PISA results, migration background and social mobility in Europe and traditional countries of immigration. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 04-17. Retrieved from

Epley, N., & Caruso, E. M. (2008). Perspective taking: Misstepping into others' shoes. In K. D. Markman, W. M. Klein, & J. A. Suhr (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 297-311). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Erle, T., & Topolinski, S. (2015). Spatial and empathic perspective-taking correlate on a dispositional level. Social Cognition, 33, 187-210. doi:

Fischer, N., Decristan, J., Theis, D., Sauerwein, M., & Wolgast, A. (2017). StEG-S - Skalen-dokumentation [StEG-S - scales documentation]. Deutsches Institut für Internationale Pädagogische Forschung (DIPF). https://doi. org/10.7477/199:180:1

Fizke, E., Barthel, D., Peters, T., & Rakoczy, H. (2014). Executive function plays a role in coordinating different perspectives, particularly when one’s own perspective is involved. Cognition, 130, 315-334. doi:

Foody, M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2012). The role of self in acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT). In L. McHugh, & I. Stewart (Eds.), The self and perspective taking: research and applications (pp. 126- 142). Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.

Galinsky, A. D., Ku, G., & Wang, C. S. (2005). Perspective taking: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 109-125. doi:

Ganzeboom, H. B. G., De Graaf, P. M., & Treiman, D. J. (1992). A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Social Science Research, 21, 1-56. doi:

Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S., & Lee, A. Y. (1999). "I" value freedom, but "we" value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10, 321-326. doi:

Gauvain, M., & Munroe, R. L. (2014). Development of perspective taking in relation to age, education, and the presence of community features associated with industrialization: A four-culture study. Cross-Cultural Research, 48, 32-44. doi:

Gehlbach, H. (2004). A new perspective on perspective taking: A multidimensional approach to conceptualizing an aptitude. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 207-234. doi:

Gore, N., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Murphy, G. (2010). The relationship between intellectual functioning and relational perspective taking. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 10, 1-17. Retrieved from

Hutchinson, K. H. (1949). An experiment in the use of comics as instructional material. The Journal of Educational Sociology, 23, 236-245. Retrieved from

Joanes, D. N., & Gill, C. A. (1998). Comparing measures of sample skewness and kurtosis. The Statistician, 47, 183-189. doi:

Konrath, S., O'Brien, E., & Hsing, C. (2011). Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 180-198. doi:

Lillard A. (1998). Ethopsychologies: Cultural variations in theories of mind? Psychological Bulletin, 123, 3-32. doi:

Lohmann, H., & Tomasello, M. (2003). The role of language in the development of false belief understanding: A training study. Child Development, 74, 1130-1144. doi:

Marshall, A., & Roth, G. (1978). Pupils’ use of time while reading comics and books. American Educational Research in Journalism, 15, 201-216. doi:

McGeown, Sarah P., Duncan, L. G., Griffiths, Y. M., & Stothard, S. E. (2015). Exploring the relationship between adolescent’s reading skills, reading motivation and reading habits. Reading and writing, 28, 545-569. doi:

Milligan, K., Astington, J. W., & Dack, L. A. (2007). Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development, 2, 622-646. doi:

Mischo, C. (2005). Promoting perspective coordination by dilemma discussion. The effectiveness of classroom group discussion on interpersonal negotiation strategies of 12-year-old students. Social Psychology of Education, 8, 41-63. doi:

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Sainsbury, M. (2015). PIRLS 2016 reading framework. In I. V. S. Mullis, & M. O. Martin (Eds.), PIRLS 2016 assessment framework (2nd ed., p. 11-29). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center. Retrieved from pirls2016/downloads/P16_FW_Chap1.pdf

Nieding, G., & Ohler, P. (1999). Der Einfluss von Protagonisten-Zielstrukturen auf räumliche mentale Modelle beim narrativen Textverstehen von Kindern [Influences of protagonist-goal-structures on spatial mental models while narrative text comprehension]. Sprache & Kognition, 18, 146-158. doi:

O`Brien, E. J., & Albrecht, J. E. (1992). Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 777-784. doi:

Pelletier, J. (2006). Relations among theory of mind, metacognitive language, reading skills and story comprehension in L1 and L2 learners. In A. Antonietti, O. Sempio-Liverta, & A. Marchetti (Eds.), Theory of mind and language in developmental contexts (pp. 77-92). New York, NY: Springer.

Piaget, J. (1977). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. In P. Wason & P. Johnson-Laird (Eds.), Thinking (pp. 158-165). Cambridge: Cambridge University.

Pornprasertmanit, S., Miller, P., Schoemann, A., & Rosseel, Y. (2014). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling. R package version 0.4-6. Retrieved from

Revelle, W. (2015). psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA. Retrieved from Version = 1.5.8.

Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1-36. Retrieved from http://www.

Rubin, D. B. (1996). Multiple imputation after 18+ years. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 473-489. doi:

Sato, M., & Bergen, B. (2013). The case of the missing pronouns: Does mentally simulated perspective play a functional role in the comprehension of person? Cognition, 127, 361-374. doi:

Schneider, W. (2015). Memory development from early childhood through emerging adulthood. Heidelberg: Springer.

Schonert-Reichl, K. A., Oberle, E., Steward, Lawlor, M., Abbott, D., Thomson, K., Oberlander, T., & Diamond, A. (2015). Enhancing cognitive and social-emotional development through a simple-to-administer mindfulness-based program for elementary school children: A randomized controlled trial. Developmental Psychology, 51, 52-66. doi:

Selman, R. L. (1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding - Developmental and clinical analyses. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Smith, R. L., & Rose, A. J. (2011). The “Cost of Caring” in youths’ friendships: Considering associations among social perspective taking, co-rumination, and empathetic distress. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1792-1803. doi:

Spinner, K. (1989). Fremdverstehen und historisches Verstehen als Ergebnis kognitiver Entwicklung [Alien understanding and historical understanding resulting from cognitive development]. Der Deutschunterricht, 4, 19-23.

Twenge, J. M., Campbell, W. K., & Gentile, B. (2012). Changes in pronoun use in American books and the rise of individualism, 1960-2008. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 406-415. doi:

Van der Graaff, J., Branje, S., De Wied, M., Hawk, S., Van Lier, P., & Meeus, W. (2014). Perspective taking and empathic concern in adolescence: Gender differences in developmental changes. Developmental Psychology, 50, 881-888. doi:

Varnum, M. E. W., Shi, Z., Chen, A., Qiu, J., & Han, S. (2014). When "your" reward is the same as "my" reward: Self-construal priming shifts neural responses to own vs. friend's rewards. NeuroImage, 87, 164-169. doi:

Weil, T. M., Hayes, S. C., & Capurro, P. (2011). Establishing a deictic relational repertoire in young children. The Psychological Record, 61, 371-390. doi:

Weiß, R. H. (2006). Wortschatztest und Zahlenfolgentest - Revision - Ergänzungstests zum CFT 20-R (WS/ZF-R) [Vocabulary and number sequencing test - revised in addition to CFT 20-R]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

Zeileis, A., & Hothorn, T. (2002). Diagnostic checking in regression relationships. R News, 2, 7-10. Retrieved from

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.34

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.144
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.359


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 61 61 40
PDF Downloads 38 38 25