Utterances as tool-mediated specifications of affordances - ecological pragmatics

Open access


The established descriptions of information structure assume that the basic cognitive unit is a categorization, and that the basic semantic structure is a predication. Descriptions based on these assumptions, however, cannot provide an adequate analysis of certain types of utterances that form a part of activities. The article presents a solution to this problem based on Wittgenstein’s private language argument and the concept of information in Gibson's theory of affordances. The basic cognitive assumption is that performers of activities attend to variations in the environment, for example visibility, and perceive the states of variations (e.g., 3000 feet). A state is defined as a local, temporary occurrence of a stimulus configuration that specifies an affordance. The basic pragmatic assumption, then, is that performers of activities share the states of variations by means of utterances. This ecological-pragmatic assumption allows for a rethinking of the usefulness of the reference-predicate distinction and bring forward different dimensions of informational analysis of utterances. It is claimed that an informative and accurate analysis of utterances that form a part of activities relies two distinctions: a distinction between a convention based regulation of attention and a convention based specification of an affordance, and a distinction between sharing information and nesting information

Adolph, K. E. (2008). Learning to move. Current directions in psychological science, 17, 213-218.

Ayer, A. J. (2001/1936). Language, truth and logic. London: Penguin.

Barwise, J., Perry. J. (1983). Situation and attitudes. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Borchmann, S. (2007). Hvad skriver vi om -topik på sætningsniveau. In P. Widell & H. Jørgensen (Eds.), Det bedre argument (pp. 53-85). Århus: Wessel & Huitfeldt.

Borchmann, S. (2013). Det mentale cockpit -en epistemologisk og psykologisk karakteristik af den meddelelsesstrukturelle konstituent variablen. Møde om Udforskningen af Dansk Sprog, 14, 77-101.

Borchmann, S. (2015). ”Fordi man ved aldrig” - emne, fokus og kohærens i informativ udøversprogbrug. Skandinaviske Sprogstudier, 6(4), 17-109.

Borchmann, S. (2016). En funktionel semantik baseret på økologisk psykologi. NyS 50 - Nydansk sprogstudier (pp. 183-220). Frederiksberg: Dansk Sprognævn. Borchmann, S. (in press). The spectator bias in the linguistic descriptions of information structure. Language sciences.

Brentano, F. (1925). Vorstellung und Urteil, zwei Klassen. Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt (pp. 38-82). Leipzig: Felix Meiner.

Bühler, K., (1965/1934). Sprachtheorie, die Darstellung der Sprache. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.

Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness, Contrastiveness, Defineteness, Subjects Topics, and Point of View. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25-55). Academic Press: London.

Chemero, A. (2011). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Clark, H. H. & Bangerter, A. (2004). Changing ideas about reference. In I. A. Noveck & D. Sperber (Eds.), Experimental pragmatics (pp. 25-49). New York, NY: Palgrave, Macmillan.

Cowley, S. (2011). Distributed language. In S. Cowley (Ed.), Distributed language (pp. 1-14). Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

Cowley, S. (2009). Distributed language and dynamics. Pragmatics & cognition 17(3), 495-507.

Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species. The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York, NY: WW. Norton & Company.

Dekker, S. (2014). The field guide to understanding ‘human error’. London: CRC Press. Taylor & Francis Group.

Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of transportation (2006). Performance specification PC based Runway Visual Range (RVR) system. Lighting Systems Office RVR Product Team (AJW-46).

Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of transportation (2010). Air Traffic Organization policy, order JO 7110.65T.

Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of transportation (2014A). Approach plate: CHICAGO MIDWAY INTL(MDW), 41°47'N-87°45'W ILS or LOC/DME RWY 31C.

Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of transportation (2014B). Approach plate: BILL AND HILLARY CLINTON NATIONAL/ADAMS FIELD (LIT), 34°44'N-92°13'W ILS or LOC RWY 4R.

Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of transportation (2013). Standards for airport markings 150/5340-1L. Flach, J. M. & J. Rasmussen (2000). Cognitive engineering. designing for situation awareness. In N. B. Sarter & R. Amalberti (Eds.), Cognitive engineering in the aviation domain (pp. 153-179). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates Publishers.

Flach, J. M., Jacques, P. F., Patrick, D. L., Amelink, M. H. J., Van Paassen, M. M., and Mulder, M. (2003). A Search for Meaning: A Case Study of the Approach-to-Landing. In E. Hollnagel (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive task analysis (pp. 171-191). Mahwan, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Frankfurt, H. (2005/1986). On bullshit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

von der Gabelentz, G. (1869). Ideen zu einer vergleichenden Syntax. Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft, 6, 376-384.

Gibson, E. J. & Rader, N. (1979). Attention: The perceiver as performer. In G. A. Hale & M. Lewis (Eds.), Attention and cognitive development (pp. 1-21). New York, NY & London: Plenum Press.

Gibson, E. J. & Pick, A. D. (2000). An ecological approach to perceptual learning and development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Golonka, S. (2015). Laws and conventions in language-related behaviors. Ecological psychology, 27(3), 236-250.

Gregor, J. A. (2006). Specialist’s factual specialist report of investigation, DCA06MA009. National Transportation Safety Board, Vehicle Recorders Division: Washington, D.C. 20594

Grice, H. P. (2001/1975) Logic and conversation. In C. Henriksen (Ed.), Can you reach the salt? Gylling (pp. 199-219). Frederiksberg: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.

Gundel, J. K. & Fretheim, T. (2005). Topic and focus. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 174-196). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Gundel, J. K. (2012). Pragmatics and information structure. In K. Allen & M. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics (pp. 585- 598). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Haberland, H. (2006). Thetic-categorial distinction. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics 2nd edition 12 (pp. 676-677). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessn, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. London: Routhledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994/1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.

Hansen, E. & Heltoft, L. (2011). Grammatik over det danske sprog. Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab. Syddansk Universitetsforlag.

Harder, P (2010). Meaning in mind and society. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Hjelmslev, L. (1993/1943). Omkring Sprogteoriens Grundlæggelse. København: The Linguistic Circle of Copenhagen.

Hodges, B. H., Steffensen, S. V., & Martin, J. E. (2012). Caring, conversing, and realizing values: New directions in language studies. Language sciences, 34, 499-506.

Hodges, B. H. (2009). Ecological pragmatics: Values, dialogical arrays, complexity, and caring. Pragmatics & cognition, 17(3), 628-652.

Hodges, B. H. (2007). Good prospects: ecological and social perspectives on conforming, creating, and caring in conversation. Language sciences, 29, 584-604.

Hodges, B. H. & Baron, R. M. (1992). Values as constraints on affordances: perceiving and acting properly. Journal for the theory of social behavior, 22, 263-294.

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. James, W. (1890/1950). Principles of psychology, 1 & 2. New York, NY: Dover.

Klein, G. (2009). Streetlights and shadows. Searching for the keys to adaptive decision making. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Klein, G. (1999). Sources of power. How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Kristoffersen, J. F., Rasmussen, D. S. L., & Mikkelsen, K. B. (2016). Ja og der er masser af plads til jer og så skyd for helvede udefra en pragmatisk analyse af fokus og emne i tetiske sætninger og imperativsætninger. Roskilde Universitet. Retrived from: http://docplayer.dk/25132983-Ja-og-der-er-masser-af-plads-til-jer-og-saa-skyd-for-helvede-udefra.html

Kuno, S. (1972). Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic inquiry, 3, 269-320.

Kuroda, S.-Y. (1972). The categorical and the thetic judgment. Foundations of language, 9, 153-185.

Kuroda, S.-Y. (2005). Focusing on the matter of topic: A study of Wa and Ga in Japanese. Journal of east asian linguistics, 14(1), 1-58.

Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leibowitz, H. W. (1988). The human senses in flight. In E. L. Wiener & D. C. Nagel (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (pp. 83-110). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Malinowski, B. (1946/1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C.K. Ogden & I. A. Richards (Eds.), The meaning of meaning: a study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism (pp.m 296-336). Eighth edition. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.

Marty, A. (1940). Von den logisch begründeten Synsemantika beim Urteilsausdruck. Psyche und Sprachstruktur. Bern: A. Francke.

Mathesius, V. (1975/1961). A functional analysis of present day english on a general linguistic basis. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.

Millikan, R. (2000). On clear and confused ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

National Transportation Safety Board (2001). Runway overrun during landing American Airlines flight 1420 McDonnell Douglas MD-82, N215AA Little Rock, Arkansas June 1, 1999. Aircraft accident report NTSB/AAR-01/02. Washington, DC.

National Transportation Safety Board (2007). Runway overrun and collision, Southwest Airlines flight 1248, Boeing 737-7H4, N471WN, Chicago Midway International Airport, Chicago, Illinois, December 8, 2005. Aircraft accident report NTSB/AAR-07/06. Washington, DC.

Odling-Smee, J. F., Laland, K. N., & Feldman, M. W. (2003). Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. New Jersey, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Plumert, J. M., Kearney, J. K., & Cremer, J. F. (2004). Children’s perception of gap affordances: Bicycling across traffic-filled intersections in an immersive virtual environment. Child development, 75, 4.

Raczazek-Leonardi, J. (2009). The structuring role of dynamics and self-organization in natural language. Pragmatics & cognition, 17(3), 653-676.

Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A. M. & Goodstein, L. P. (1993). Cognitive systems engineering. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Reed, E. S. (1996). Encountering the world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Reimer, M. & Michaelson, E. (2017). Reference. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. [retrived from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/reference/]

Reinhart, T. (1982) Pragmatics and linguistics. Analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica, 27, 53-94.

Ritchie, M. (1988). General Aviation. In E. L. Wiener & D. C. Nagel (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (pp. 561-589). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Rosengren, I. (1997). The thetic/categorical distinction revisited once more. Linguistics, 35, 439-479.

Sasse, H. J. (1987). The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics, 25, 511-580.

Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Seibt, J. (2016). Process Philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, winter edition. [retrived from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/process-philosophy/]

Seidlhofer, B. (1995). Approaches to summarization: Discourse analysis and language education. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.

Strawson, P. F. (2004/1950). On referring, logico-linguistic papers. Ashgate: Aldershote.

Strawson, P. F. (1974). Subject and predicate in logic and grammar. London: Methuen.

Sullivan, A. (2012). Referring in discourse. In A. Keith & M. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics, Volume I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.,

Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Turvey, M. T., Shaw, R., Reed, E., & Mace, W. (1981). Ecological laws of perceiving and acting: In reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn (1981). Cognition, 9, 237-304.

Verstraete, J.-C. (in press) Formal criteria for subordination in the Germanic languages: in search of an explanation. In B. Cornillie, D. Divjak, P. Mertens, & P. Swiggers (Eds.), Structuring linguistic form (Orbis supplementa). Leuven: Peeters.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Wilkinson, S. (1994). The november Oscar incident. Air & space, march, 80-87. Wilson, A. D. & Golonka, S. (2013). Embodied cognition is not what you think it is. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 1-13.

Wittgenstein, L. (1968/1953). Philosophische Untersuchungen, Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Zukow-Goldring, P. & Arbib, M. A. (2007). Affordances, effectivities, and assisted imitation: Caregivers and the directing of attention, Neurocomputing, 70, 2181-2193.

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.34

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.144
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.359


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 113 113 12
PDF Downloads 79 79 9