Understanding Contextual and Social Meaning in Typically Developing Finnish-Speaking Four- To Eight-Year-Old Children

Open access


This study examined the development of social-pragmatic comprehension in 170 Finnish four- to eight-year-old children. The children were asked to respond to socially and contextually demanding questions targeting their social-pragmatic language processing, and to explain their correct answers in order to elicit their awareness of how they had derived the answers from the context. The results showed that the number of correct answers increased especially between the ages of four and seven years. We found that questions demanding contextual processing without mind-reading were the easiest to understand, followed by questions demanding processing of feelings of others and false beliefs. The questions demanding understanding of relevant language use and processing of contextual factors including mental states and intentions were the most challenging for the children. Between four and five years of age there was a remarkable developmental phase in children’s ability to give proper explanations.


  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

  • Angeleri, R., & Airenti, G. (2014). The development of joke and irony understanding: A study with 3-to 6-year-old children. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 68(2), 133. Doi:10.1037/cep0000011

  • Angeleri, R., Gabbatore, I., Bosco, F. M., Sacco, K., & Colle, L. (2016). Pragmatic abilities in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: A study with the ABaCo battery. Minerva Psichiatrica, 57(3), 93-103.

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Theory of mind and autism: A fifteen year review. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (2nd ed.), (pp. 3-20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Bezuidenhout, A., & Sroda, M. S. (1998). Children’s use of contextual cues to resolve referential ambiguity: An application of relevance theory. Pragmatics and Cognition, 6, 265-299. Doi:10.1075/pc.6.1-2.14bez

  • Bosco, F. M., Angeleri, R., Colle, L., Sacco, K., & Bara, B. G. (2013). Communicative abilities in children: An assessment through different phenomena and expressive means. Journal of Child Language, 40, 741-778. Doi:10.1017/S0305000913000081

  • Bosco, F. M., & Gabbatore, I. (2017a). Theory of mind in recognizing and recovering communicative failures. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 57-88. Doi:10.1017/S0142716416000047

  • Bosco, F. M., & Gabbatore, I. (2017b). Sincere, Deceitful, and Ironic Communicative Acts and the Role of the Theory of Mind in Childhood. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 21. Doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00021

  • Bosco, F. M., Gabbatore, I., & Tirassa, M. (2014). A broad assessment of theory of mind in adolescence: the complexity of mindreading. Consciousness and Cognition, 24, 84-97. Doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.01.003

  • Bucciarelli, M., Colle, L., & Bara, B. G. (2003). How children comprehend speech acts and communicative gestures. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 207-241. Doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00099-1

  • Cohen, J. (1992). Quantative methods in psychology. A Power Primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159. Doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

  • Conti-Ramsden, G., & Botting, N. (2004). Social difficulties and victimization in children with SLI at 11 years of age. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 145-161. Doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2004/013)

  • Cummings, L. (2009). Clinical pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cummings, L. (2014). Pragmatic Disorders. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology 3. London: Springer.

  • Diamond, A. (2002). Normal development of prefrontal cortex from birth to young adulthood: Cognitive functions, anatomy, and biochemistry. In D. Stuss & R. Knight (Eds.), Principles of frontal lobe function, (pp. 466-503). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Donaldson, M. L. (1986). Children’s explanations: A psycholinguistic study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Dunn, K. (1987). Understanding feelings: the early stages. In J. Bruner & H. Haste (Eds.), Making Sense: The Child’s Construction of the World, (pp. 17-26). London: Methuen.

  • Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1986). Context and continuity: Classroom discourse and the development of shared knowledge. In Durkin, K. (Ed.), Language Development in School Years, (pp. 172-203). London: Croom Helm.

  • Filippova, E. & Astington, J. (2010). Children’s understanding of social-cognitive and social-communicative aspects of discourse irony. Child Development, 81, 913-928. Doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01442.x

  • German, D. J. (2000). Test of Word Finding (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson [Translation and standardization of the Finnish version: Niilo Mäki Instituutti, 2007].

  • Gertner, B. L., Rice, M. L., & Hadley, P. A. (1994). Influence of communicative competence on peer preferences in a preschool classroom. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 37, 913-923.

  • Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. I. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

  • Glenwright, M., & Pexman, P. M. (2010). Development of children's ability to distinguish sarcasm and verbal irony. Journal of Child Language, 37, 429-451. Doi:10.1017/S0305000909009520

  • Happé F. G. E. (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism. A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48, 101-109.

  • Harris, M., & Pexman, P. M. (2003). Children’s perceptions of the social functions of verbal irony. Discourse Processes, 36, 147-165. Doi:10.1207/ S15326950DP3603_1

  • Heiphetz, L., Spelke, E. S., Harris, P. L. & Banaji, M. R. (2013). The development of reasoning about beliefs: Fact, preference, and ideology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 559-565. Doi:10.1016/j. jesp.2012.09.005

  • Hoehl, S. & Striano, T. (2010). Infant’s neural processing of positive emotions and eye gaze. Social Neuroscience, 5, 30-39. Doi:10.1080/17470910903073232

  • Hudson, J. A., & Slackman, E. A. (1990). Children’s use of scripts in inferential text processing. Discourse Processes, 13, 375-386. Doi:10.1080/01638539009544766

  • Hyter, Y. (2017). Pragmatic Assessment and Intervention in Children. In L. Cummings (Ed.), Research in Clinical Pragmatics (pp. 493-526). Series: Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, Vol. 11, Cham, Switzerland: Springer-Verlag.

  • Jones, L. B., Rothbart, M. K., & Posner, M. I. (2003). Development of executive attention in preschool children. Developmental Science, 6, 498-504. Doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00307

  • Leinonen, E., Letts, C., & Smith, B. R. (2000). Children’s Pragmatic Communication Difficulties. London: Whurr Publishers.

  • Leinonen, E., Ryder, N., Ellis, M., & Hammond, C. (2003). The use of context in pragmatic comprehension by specifically language-impaired and control children. Linguistics, 41-2, 407-423. Doi:10.1515/ling.2003.014

  • Letts, C., & Leinonen, E. (2001). Comprehension of inferential meaning in language-impaired and language normal children. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorder, 36, 307-328. Doi:10.1080/13682820110045829

  • Lohmann, H., Tomasello, M., & Meyer, S. (2005). Linguistic communication and social understanding. In J. W. Astington & J. A. Baird. Why Language Matters for Theory of Mind (pp. 245-265). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Loukusa, S. (2017). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. In L. Cummings (Ed.), Research in Clinical Pragmatics, (pp. 85-107), Series: Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, Vol. 11, Cham: Springer-Verlag.

  • Loukusa, S., & Leinonen, E. (2008). Development of comprehension of ironic utterances in 3- to 9-year-old Finnish-speaking children. Psychology of Language and Communication, 12, 55-69. Doi:10.2478/v10057-008-0003-0

  • Loukusa, S., Leinonen, E., & Ryder, N. (2007). Development of pragmatic language comprehension in Finnish-speaking children. First Language, 27, 281-298. Doi:10.1177/0142723707076568

  • Loukusa, S., & Moilanen, I. (2009). Pragmatic inference abilities in individuals with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. A review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 890-904. Doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2009.05.002

  • Loukusa, S., Ryder, N., & Leinonen, E. (2008). Answering questions and explaining answers: A study of Finnish-speaking children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 37, 219-241. Doi:10.1007/s10936-007-9067-6

  • Mackie, L., & Law, J. (2010). Pragmatic language and the child with emotional/ behavioural difficulties (EBD): A pilot study exploring the interaction between behaviour and communication disability. International journal of language & communication disorders, 45, 397-410. Doi:10.3109/ 13682820903105137

  • McGhee, R., Ehrler, D. J., & DiSimoni, F. (2007). Token test for children (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and Minds: How We Use Language to Think Together. London: Routledge.

  • Miller, C. A. (2006). Developmental relationships between language and theory of mind (tutorial). American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 142−154. Doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2006/014)

  • Milosky, L. M. (1992). Children listening: The role of world knowledge in language comprehension. In R. S. Chapman (Ed.), Processes in language acquisition and disorders, (pp. 20-44). St Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book.

  • Morton, J. B. & Trehub, S. E. (2001). Children’s understanding of emotion in speech. Child Development, 72, 834-43. Doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00318

  • Mäkinen, L., Loukusa, S., Nieminen, L., Leinonen, E., & Kunnari, S. (2014). The development of narrative productivity, syntactic complexity, referential cohesion, and event content in four- to eight-year-old Finnish children. First Language, 34, 24-42. Doi:10.1177/0142723713511000

  • Nelson, K., (2005). Language pathways into the community of minds. In J. W. Astington & J. A. Baird (Eds.), Why Language Matters for Theory of Mind (pp. 26-49). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Nilsen, E. S., Glenwright, M., & Huyder, V. (2011). Children and adults understand that verbal irony interpretation depends on listener knowledge. Journal of Cognition and Development, 12, 374-409. Doi:10.1080/152483 72.2010.544693

  • O’Neill, D. K. (2014). Assessing pragmatic language functioning in young children: Its importance and challenges. In D. Matthews (Ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition (pp. 363-386). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • O’Neill, D. K. (2012). Components of pragmatic ability and children’s pragmatic language development. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Cognitive pragmatics (pp. 261-287). Berlin: De Gruyter.

  • Perkins, M. R. (2011) Clinical pragmatics. In J-O Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Pragmatics in Practice (pp. 66-92). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Perkins, M. (2007). Pragmatic impairment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Premack, D. & Woodroff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a "theory of mind"? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 515-526. Doi:10.1017/ S0140525X00076512

  • Prutting, C. A. (1982). Pragmatics as social competence. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 123-134. Doi:10.1044/jshd.4702.123

  • Ryder, N., & Leinonen, E. (2003). Use of context in question answering by 3-, 4- and 5-year-old children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 397-415. Doi:10.1023/A:1024847529077

  • Ryder, N., Leinonen, E., & Schulz, J. A. (2008). Cognitive approach to assessing pragmatic language comprehension in children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 43, 427-447. Doi:10.1080/13682820701633207

  • Schmid, H.-J. (2012). Generalizing the apparently ungeneralizable. Basic ingredients of a cognitive-pragmatic approach to the construal of meaning-in-context. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Cognitive pragmatics (pp. 3-22). Berlin: De Gruyter.

  • Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds). Syntax and Semantics. Volume 3: Speech Acts, (pp. 59-82). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

  • Siegal, M. & Beattie, K. (1991). Where to look first for children’s knowledge of false beliefs. Cognition, 38, 1-12. Doi:10.1016/0010-0277(91)90020-5

  • Spencer, K. D. (2001). Broadening the units of analysis in communication: speech and nonverbal behaviours in pragmatic comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 28, 325-349. Doi:10.1017/S0305000901004664

  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2012). Introduction: pragmatics. In D. Wilson & S. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning and relevance (pp. 1-27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

  • Talwar, V., Gordon, H. M., & Lee, K. (2007). Lying in the elementary school years: verbal deception and its relation to second-order belief understanding. Developmental Psychology, 43, 804-810. Doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.804

  • Vieiro, P., & García-Madruga, J. A. (1997). An analysis of story comprehension through spoken and written summaries in school-age children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 41-53. Doi:10.1023/A:1007932429184

  • Väisänen, R., Loukusa, S., Moilanen, I., & Yliherva, A. (2014). Language and pragmatic profile in children with ADHD measured by Children’s Communication Checklist 2nd edition. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 39, 179-187. Doi:10.3109/14015439.2013.784802

  • Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655-684. Doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00304

  • Wellman, H. M., & Lagattuta, K. H. (2000). Developing understanding of mind. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds), Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (2nd ed.), 21-49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Wimmer, H., Hogrefe, G.-J., & Perner, J. (1988). Children’s understanding of informational access as source of knowledge. Child Development, 59, 386-396. Doi:10.2307/1130318

  • Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103-128. Doi:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5

  • Wilson, D. (2012). Metarepresentation in linguistic communication. In D. Wilson & S. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning and relevance (pp. 230-258). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Wilson, D. (2013). Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 40-56. Doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.016

  • World Health Organisation (2016). International Classification of Diseases, 11th revision (ICD-11). Retrieved June 6, 2016, from http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/revision/en/

Journal Information

CiteScore 2016: 0.24

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.200
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.380

Cited By


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 21 21 21
PDF Downloads 6 6 6