Self-Regulated Strategies for School Writing Tasks: A Cross-Cultural Report

Open access


We investigated cross-cultural differences in ninth-grade students’ reported use of self-regulated strategies for writing. We assessed 12 self-regulated strategies for writing tapping environmental, behavioural, and personal self-regulated processes. Seven hundred and thirty-two Portuguese and Brazilian students in transition to high school (Mage = 14.3; 372 male and 306 female) from mainstream urban schools reported on their use of the strategies. Statistical analyses included a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) with 12 dependent variables (self-regulated strategies for writing) and 2 between-subjects variables (country and gender). There were significant main effects for country with medium effect sizes and statistically significant small effect sizes for gender main effects. All-male and all-female comparisons indicated significant differences and medium effect sizes within gender groups. The majority of the differences tapped personal self-regulated strategies. Taken together, these findings suggest that initiating and controlling writing may be a contextualised bounded process.

Alexander, P., Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1998). A perspective on strategy research: Progress and prospects. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 129-154. doi:

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Barbeiro, L.F. (2011). What happens when I write? Pupil's writing about writing. Reading and Writing, 24, 813-834. doi:

Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Berninger, V.W. (Ed.) (2012). Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Berninger, V. W., Whitaker, D., Feng, Y., Swanson, H. L., & Abbott, R. D. (1996). Assessment of planning, translating, and revising in junior high writers. Journal of School Psychology, 34, 23-52. doi:

Blake, B. E. (1995). Broken silences: Writing and the construction of ‘cultural texts’ by urban, preadolescent girls. Journal of Educational Thought, 29, 165-180. Retrieved from

Cunha, N. B., & Santos, A. (2006). Relação entre a compreensão de leitura e a produção escrita em universitários [The relation between college students’ reading comprehension and writing]. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 19, 237-245. doi:

Engelhand, G. J., Walker, E. V. S., Gordon, B., & Gabrielson, S. (1994). Writing tasks and gender: Influences on writing quality of black and white students. The Journal of Educational Research, 87, 197-209. doi:

Gelati, C. (2012). Female superiority and gender similarity effects and interest factors in writing. In V.W. Berninger (Ed.), Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology (pp. 153- 174). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Graham, S., Berninger, V., & Weihua, F. (2007). The structural relationship between writing attitude and writing achievement in first and third grade students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 516-536.

Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2000). The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educational Psychologist, 35, 3-12. doi:

Graham, S., MacArthur, C. A., & Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.) (2013). Best practices in writing instruction. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Graham, S., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2016). Writing education around the globe: Introduction and call for a new global analysis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26, 781-792. doi: 10.1007/s11145-016-9640-1

Hadjar, A., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Priem, K., & Glock, S. (2014). Gender and educational achievement. Educational Research, 56, 117-125. doi:

Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-29). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2009). Self-regulated strategy development in writing: Premises, evolution, and the future. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II, 1, 113-135. doi:

Harris, K. R., Santangelo, T., & Graham, S. (2010). Metacognition and strategies instruction in writing. In H. S. Waters & W. Schneider (Eds.), Metacognition, strategy use & instruction (pp. 226-256). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Jones, S. (2007). Composing in the style of Mozart: An exploration of the struggling boy writer comparing the composing processes and strategies of boys and girls. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6, 97-112.

Jones, S. (2011). Mapping the landscape: Gender and the writing classroom. Journal of Writing Research, 3, 161-179. Retrieved from

Kanlapan, M. T. C. E, & Velasco, J. C. (2009). Constructing a self-regulation scale contextualized in writing. TESOL Journal, 1, 79-94. Retrieved from[1].pdf

Kaplan, A., Lichtinger, E., & Gorodetsky, M. (2009). Achievement goal orientations and self-regulation in writing: An integrative perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 51-69. doi:

Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1, 1-26. Retrieved from http://

Lahelma, E. (2014). Troubling discourses on gender and education. Educational Research, 56, 171-183. doi:

Limpo, T., & Alves, R. A. (2013). Modeling writing development: Contribution of transcription and self-regulation to Portuguese students’ text generation quality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 401-413. doi:

Luke, A. (1988). Literacy, textbooks and ideology. London: Falmer Press.

Malpique, A., & Veiga Simão, A. M. V. (2012). Cinderela e o sapato de cristal: Ensinando estratégias de autorregulação para a composição escrita [Cinderella's crystal slipper: Teaching self-regulated strategies for writing]. In A. M. V. Veiga Simão, L. M. B. Frison & M. H. M. B. Abrahão, Autorregulação da aprendizagem a narrativas autobiográficas: Epistemologia e práticas (pp. 155-178). Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS.

Malpique, A., & Veiga Simão, A.M. (2015). Assessing self-regulated strategies for school writing: Cross-cultural validation of a triadic measure. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33, 141-153. doi: 10.1177/0734282914547873

Meijer, J., Sleegers, P., Elshout-Mohr, M., Daalen-Kapteijns, M., Meeus, W., & Tempelaar, D. (2013). The development of a questionnaire on metacognition for students in higher education. Educational Research, 55, 31-52. doi:

Myhill, D., & Fisher, R. (2010). Editorial: Writing development: Cognitive, sociocultural, linguistic perspectives. Journal of Research in Reading, 33, 1-3. doi:

McCutchen, D. (1995). Cognitive processes in children's writing: Developmental and individual differences. Issues in Education, 1, 123-160.

McInerney, D. M. (2011). Culture and self-regulation in educational contexts; assessing the relationship of cultural group to self-regulation. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. J. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 442-464). New York, NY: Routledge.

Miller, B., & McCardle, P. (2011). Reflections on the need for continued research on writing. Reading and Writing, 24, 121-132. doi:

Nystrand, M. (2006). The social and historical context for writing research. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 11-27). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Nückles, M., Hübner, S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Enhancing self-regulated learning by writing learning protocols. Learning and Instruction, 19, 259-271. doi:

Pajares, F. (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory Into Practice, 41, 116-125. doi:

Pajares, F., Miller, D. M., & Johnson, M. J. (1999). Gender differences in writing self-beliefs of elementary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 50-61. doi:

Peterson, S. (2002). Gender meanings in grade eight student's talk about classroom writing. Gender and Education, 14, 351-366. doi:

Prior, P. (2006). A sociocultural theory of writing. . In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 54-66). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Purves, A. C. (1992). Reflections on research and assessment in written composition. Research in the Teaching of English, 26, 108-122.

Schultz, K., & Fecho, B. (2000). Society’s child: Social context and writing development. Educational Psychologist, 35, 51-62. doi:

Sousa, D. H., Ferreira, M. A., Romão, R. B., Pereira, S., & Lourenço, V. (2013). Projetos testes intermédios: Relatório 2012 [ Mid-term evaluation project: 2012 report] Lisboa: GAVE.

Swanson, H. L., & Berninger, V. W. (1996). Individual differences in children's working memory and writing skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 358-385. doi:

Triandis, H. C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. American Psychologist, 51, 407. doi:

Veiga Simão, A. M., Malpique, A., Frison, L. M. B, Marques, A. (2016). Teaching writing to middle school students in Portugal and in Brazil: An exploratory study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 955-979. doi: 10.1007/s11145-015-9606-8

Weinstein, C.E., Husman, J., & Dierking, D.R. (2000). Self-regulation interventions with focus on learning strategies. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp.728-747). Oxford: Elsevier Academic Press.

Wolters, C., A., Benzon, M.B., & Arroyo-Giner, C. (2011). Assessing strategies for the self-regulation of motivation. In B.J. Zimmerman & D.J. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 298- 312). New York, NY: Routledge.

Zimmerman, B.J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284-290. doi:

Zimmerman, B.J., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 73-101. doi:

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.34

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.144
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.359


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 343 343 37
PDF Downloads 140 140 18